Keywords
sintience
octopus farms
ethics based on suffering
animal ethics
How to Cite
Abstract
The Galician company Nueva Pescanova will open the first octopus farm in the world in 2023. The octopus is a sentient animal that, until now, has not been produced in aquaculture farms. Two main arguments are used to justify octopus farms: providing high-quality food to the population (in accordance with the objectives of aquaculture) and promoting octopus conservation. This article will argue that none of these objectives justify the use of these animals as resources. Finally, it will be discussed why the principles of animal welfare in octopus farming are insufficient and why ethics based on suffering guide us to reject these animal production projects.
References
ÁVILA GAITÁN, I.D. Las ocho inflexiones de los animalismos situados. Fractal, No. 91, 2023. Disponible en: https://mxfractal.org/articulos/RevistaFractal91Avila.php. Acceso ene. 2023.
BATTÚ, N. Falacias y manejos falaces con impacto jurídico: ideas para detectarlos y neutralizarlos. 1a ed. Santa Fe: Ediciones Universidad Nacional del Litoral, 2020.
BIRCH, J. et al. Review of the Evidence of Sentience in Cephalopod, Molluscs and Decapod Crustaceans. Londres: The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2021.
BRIONES, A. Una defensa de las axiologías centradas en el sufrimiento. Ágora, vol. 41, pp. 13-25, 2022.
BROOM, D.M. Considering animal’s feelings. Animal Sentience, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1-12, 2016.
BROOM, D.M. Sentience and animal welfare. Wallingford: CABI, 2014.
BROWNING, H. What is good for an octopus? Animal Sentience, vol. 243, 2019.
BROWNING, H. y VEIT, W. Improving invertebrate welfare. Animal Sentience, vol. 5, no. 29, 2020.
CONNIFF, R. Wildlife Farming: Does It Help Or Hurt Threatened Species? Yale Environment 360, New Haven, Yale School of the Environment, 2016. Disponible en: https://e360.yale.edu/features/wildlife_farming_does_it_help_or_hurt_threatened_species. Acceso jun. 2022.
FARIA, C. Equality, Priority and Nonhuman Animals. Dilemata, vol. 14, pp. 225-236, 2014.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. Aquaculture. Roma. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/fishery/es/aquaculture. Acceso sep. 2022.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. Artículo 6.19 Principios Generales. Código de Conducta para la Pesca Responsable. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/3/W4493S/w4493s03.htm. Acceso el 30 jun 2022.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Roma. 243p. 2020. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/3/ca9229es/ca9229es.pdf. Acceso sep. 2022.FRANCIONE, G. Introducción a los derechos de los animales: ¿Tu hijo o el perro? Prensa de la Universidad de Temple, 2010.
GIMENEZ-CANDELA, M. Dignity, sentience, personality: the legal relationship between Animals and Humans. Da Derecho Animal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 17-28, 2018.
HORTA, O. Egalitarianism and Animals. Between the Species, vol. 19, pp. 108-144, 2016.
HORTA, O. Un paso adelante en defensa de los animales. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés, 2022.
JACQUET, J., FRANKS, B. and GODFREY-SMITH, P. The octopus mind and the argument against farming it. Animal Sentience, vol. 26, no. 19, 2019.
JACQUET, J., FRANKS, B., GODFREY-SMITH, P. y SÁNCHEZ SUÁREZ, W. The Case Against Octopus Farming. Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 37–44, 2019.
JOY, M. Por qué amamos a los perros, nos comemos a los cerdos y nos vestimos con las vacas: una introducción al carnismo. Plaza y Valdés, 2013.
LOCKWOOD, J.A. The moral standing of insects and the ethics of extinction. Florida Entomologist, vol. 70, pp. 70-89, 1987.
LONGO STEFANO B., CLARK, B., YORK, R., JORGENSON, A.K. Aquaculture and the displacement of fisheries captures. Conservation Biology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 832–841, 2019.
LOW, P. Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, En: PANKSEPP, J.; REISS, D.; EDELMAN, D.; VAN SWINDEREN, B.; LOW, P.; KOCH, C. (Ed.), proclamada en Cambridge, UK, en la Francis Crick Memorial Conference on Consciousness in Human and non-Human Animals, Julio 7, 2012. Disponible en: http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf. Acceso ago. 2022.
MARSHALL, C. The world’s first octopus farm - should it go ahead? BBC environment and rural affairs correspondent, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-59667645. Acceso jun. 2022.
MELLOR, D.J. Welfare-aligned Sentience: Enhanced Capacities to Experience, Interact, Anticipate, Choose and Survive.OIE. Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres 6/08/2022. Capítulo 7.1. Introducción a las recomendaciones para el bienestar de los animales. Disponible en: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/esp/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_introduction.pdf. Acceso dic. 2022.
OLIVEIRA, E. M., y GOLDIN, J. R. La legislación de protección animal para fines científicos y la no inclusión de los invertebrados – análisis bioético. Revista Bioética, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45-56, 2014.
ORTIZ MILLÁN, G., ¿Son éticamente justificables los zoológicos? En: Aguilera Drey, B., Lecaros, J.A., Valdés Meza, E. (Ed.) Ética animal, fundamentos empíricos, teóricos y dimensión práctica, pp. 307-324, 2019.
PROCTOR, H.S., Carder, G. y Cornish, A.R. Searching for animal sentience: A systematic review of the scientific literature. Animals, vol. 3, pp. 882-906, 2013.
RIDLON A.D., Wasson K., Waters T., Adams J., Donatuto J., Fleener G. et al. Conservation aquaculture as a tool for imperiled marine species: Evaluation of opportunities and risks for Olympia oysters. Ostrea lurida. PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 6, 2021.
ROZAS, M., CANCINO-RODEZNO, A. y HORTA, O. Las éticas centradas en el sufrimiento y sus implicaciones para el cuestionamiento del uso de los animales: Suffering-Focused Ethics and their Implications for the Critique of the Use of Animals. Revista De Filosofía, vol. 38, no. 99, pp. 81-97, 2021.
SHIPMAN, M. Aquaculture does little, if anything, to conserve wild fisheries. North Carolina State University, 2019. Disponible en: https://news.ncsu.edu/2019/02/study-aquaculture-does-little-if-anything-to-conserve-wild-fisheries/. Acceso jun. 2022.
SINGER, P. Todos los animales son iguales. En: Liberación animal. Madrid: Trotta. pp. 37–59, 1999.TÉLLEZ, E., SCHUNEMANN, A., VANDA, B., Y LINARES, J. Argumentos con los que se intenta legitimar la enseñanza lesiva con animales en medicina veterinaria y zootecnia. Dilemata, vol. 15, pp. 289-298, 2014.
TENSEN, L. Under what circumstances can wildlife farming benefit species conservation? Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 6, pp. 286-298, 2016.
VAN HUIS, A. Welfare of farmed insects. Journal of Insects as food and feed, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 159-162, 2019.
VINDING, M. Suffering-focused ethics: Defense and implications, Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica Acceso en dic. 2022.
VILLAMOR, A. The Suffering of Invertebrates: An Approach from Animal Ethics. Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 61, pp. 403-420, 2007-8498 (en línea). Disponible en: https://revistas.up.edu.mx/topicos/article/view/1197/1843. Acceso sep. 2022.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Aurora