SOCIAL JUSTICE AS EQUAL ACCESS: TOWARDS AN ANTI-CAPACITIST
POR UMA ABORDAGEM ANTICAPACITISTA DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/2358-8845.2023.v10n2.p11-24Keywords:
Human Rights, Accessibility, Justice, People with DisabiliesAbstract
The present text is a theoretical essay created through a literary review, which aims to link the production of a fair society as directly related to the constitution of equal interactions between the most diverse subjects in the most varied spaces. This demand has as organizational assumption the embodiment of a radical critique of structural capacitism, which, through a process of naturalization of asymmetrical relationships, depersonalizes and deprives the experience of disability as of lesser value, a fact that ends up narrowing the development possibilities of subjects who live this experience. Undeniably, part of this marginalization is due to the exclusion of people with disabilities from political/public arenas, and it is precisely on this content that this article will develop its theses and antitheses, taking as a central assumption the idea that social justice and access will be achieved altering both the physical form of the world and the way in which it is sensed and perceived.
Downloads
References
ALDRICH, Michelle. ‘Beginning Bibliography’, Off Our Backs, 11/5 39, 1981.
BRASIL. EMENDA CONSTITUCIONAL Nº 45, DE 30 DE DEZEMBRO DE 2004. “Altera dispositivos dos arts. 5º, 36, 52, 92, 93, 95, 98, 99, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 109, 111, 112, 114, 115, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 134 e 168 da Constituição Federal, e acrescenta os arts. 103-A, 103B, 111-A e 130-A, e dá outras providências.” Brasil, 2004. Disponível em: Emenda Constitucional nº 45 (planalto.gov.br).
BRASIL. Decreto nº 6.949, de 25 de agosto de 2009. Promulga a Convenção Internacional sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência e seu Protocolo Facultativo, assinados em Nova York, em 30 de março de 2007 [internet]. Brasília: 2009.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.146, de 06 de julho de 2015. Institui a Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência (Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência). Brasília: 2015.
CAMPBELL, Fiona Kumari. “InciPng Legal FicPons: Disability's Date with Ontology and the Ableist Body of the Law.” Griffith Law Review, London, v. 10, n.1, p. 42-62, 2001.
CAMPBELL, Fiona Kumari. Contours of Ableism: The production of disability and abledness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
CAMPBELL, Fiona Kumari. Stalking Ableism: Using Disability to Expose ‘Abled’ Narcissism. In: Goodley, D., Hughes, B., Davis, L. (eds) Disability and Social Theory: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
CAMPBELL, Fiona Kumari. ‘Queer Anti-sociality and Disability Unbecoming An Ableist Relations Project?’ In New Intimacies/Old Desires: Law, Culture and Queer Politics in Neoliberal Times, edited by Oishik Sircar and Dipika Jain, 280–316. New Delhi: Zubaan Books, 2017.
CAMPBELL, Fiona Kumari. ‘Precision Ableism: A Studies in Ableism Approach to Developing Histories of Disability and Abledment’, Rethinking History 23/2, p.135–56, 2019.
CHARLTON, James. Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2010.
DAVIS, Lennard. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London; New York: Verso, 1995.
FANON, Frantz. Pele negra, máscaras brancas. Salvador: Ed. UFBA, 2008
FRASER, Nancy. Mapeando a imaginação feminista: da redistribuição ao reconhecimento e à representação. Revista Estudos Feministas, v. 15, n. 2, p. 291–308, 2007.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1974.
GARLAND-THOMSON, Rosemarie. "Disability Studies: A Field Emerged." American Quarterly, 65.4, p.915-926, 2013.
HAHN, Harland.'Public Support for Rehabilitation Programmes: the Analysis of U.S. disability policy'. Disability, Handicap & Society, v.1, n.1, 1986.
HOOKS, Bell. Yearning: Race, Gender and Cultural Politics. Boston, South End Press, 1990.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) – Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde de 2019. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2021.
LINDQVIST, Bengt. Thoughts on the elaboration of a disability Convention, 2002.
MARKS, Debora. Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives. London: Routledge, 1999.
MIGUEL, Luís Felipe. “Impasses da accountability: dilemas e alternativas da representação política”. Rev. Sociol. Polit., Curitiba, n.25, p.25-38, Nov. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782005000200004, 2005
MIGUEL, Luís Felipe. “Bourdieu e o "pessimismo da razão"”. Tempo soc., São Paulo, v.27, n.1, p.197-216, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-207020150111.
OLIVER, Mike. The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1990.
PHILLIPS, Anne. “De uma política de ideias a uma política de presença?”. Revista Estudos Feministas [online]. v. 9, n. 1 pp. 268-290, 2001.
PICCOLO, Gustavo Martins. O lugar da pessoa com deficiência na história: uma narrativa ao avesso da lógica ordinária. Appris: Curitiba, Paraná:PR, 2022.
PINTO, Céli Regina Jardim. “Espaços deliberativos e a questão da representação”. Rev. bras. Ci. Soc. [online]. 2004, vol.19, n.54, pp.97-113, 2004. ISSN 1806-9053. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092004000100006.
QUINN, Gerard. (et al). Human rights and disability. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2002.
RAUSCHER, Laura; MCCLINTOCK, Mary. ‘Ableism Curriculum Design’. In Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice: A Sourcebook. Edited by Maurianne Adams, Lee Anne Bell and Pat Griffin, p.198–229. New York: Routledge, 1997.
SHAPIRO, Joseph. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books, 1993.
SCHUR, Lisa.; ADYA, Meera.; AMERI, Mason. “Accessible Democracy: Reducing Voting Obstacles for People with Disabilities”. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. V.14, n.1 p. 60-65, 2015.
TSE. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE). “Estatísticas Eleitorais de 2020 - Divulgação de Candidaturas e Contas Eleitorais”. In: Estatísticas Eleitorais 2020. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral: Brasília. In: Estatísticas Eleitorais — Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (tse.jus.br), 2020.
TSE. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE). “Estatísticas Eleitorais de 2022 - Divulgação de Candidaturas e Contas Eleitorais”. In: Estatísticas Eleitorais, 2022. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral: Brasília. In: Estatísticas Eleitorais — Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (tse.jus.br), 2022.
UPIAS. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Fundamental Principles of Disability Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, Leeds University: London, 1996.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. “Representação política, identidade e minorias”. Lua Nova. São Paulo, n.67, p.139-190, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452006000200006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The works published in RDPEE are the sole responsibility of their authors. The authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Attribution-CC BY, which allows distribution, remixing, adaptation and creation from the work with recognition of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors consent that their articles may be incorporated by RDPEE into indexers and databases that currently exist or may exist in the future; the owners of these databases may reproduce, transmit and distribute the texts, in whole or in part, in any form or means of electronic transmission that exists or may be developed in the future.
Qualis Capes (2017-2020)
Education: B1
