Keywords
Critical moments
Public problems
Public arena
How to Cite
Abstract
This article presents the main contributions to the Social Sciences of some of the leading authors of French pragmatism. However, given the variety of authors, themes, and concepts that orbit pragmatist sociology, we chose to focus on the sociology of criticism by Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot, Daniel Cefaï's studies, and, to a lesser extent, Louis Queré’s, about problematic situations, public problems and the public arena. Thus, this brief and interested incursion into the debate undertaken by pragmatist authors intends to outline some key elements of the debate, highlighting the main arguments and concepts of this important academic movement.
References
BOLTANSKI, Luc; THÉVENOT, Laurent. On justification: economies of worth. Princeton: Princenton University Press, 1991.
BOLTANSKI, Luc The Sociology of Critical Capacity. European Journal of Social Theory v.2, n.3, pp. 359–377, 1999.
CEFAÏ, Daniel. Qu’Est-ce qu’une Arène publique? Quelques pistes pour une approche pragmatiste. In: CEFAÏ, Daniel; JOSEPH, Isaac (Orgs.). L’Héritage du pragmatisme. La Tour d’Aigues: L’Aube, 2002.
CEFAÏ, Daniel. Como nos mobilizamos? A contribuição de uma abordagem pragmatista para a sociologia da ação coletiva. Dilemas, v. 4, n., pp. 11-48, 2009.
CEFAÏ, Daniel. Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas: O que nos ensina o pragmatismo (Parte 1). Novos Estudos Cebrap, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 187-213, 2017.
CEFAÏ, Daniel. Público, Socialização e Politização: Reler John Dewey na companhia de George Herbert Mead. In: CORRÊA, Diogo Silva et al (org.). Crítica e pragmatismo na sociologia: Diálogos entre Brasil e França. São Paulo: Annablume Editora, 2018.
CEFAÏ, Daniel; PASQUIER, Dominique. (2003) Introduction. In: CEFAÏ, Daniel; PASQUIER, Dominique (org.). Les sens du public: Publics politiques, publics médiatiques. Paris: PUF, 2003
CHATEAURAYNAUD, Francis. Pragmatique des transformations et sociologie des controverses: Les logiques d'enquête face au temps long des processos. Raisons pratiques, v. 25, 2016.
CORRÊA, Diogo Silva; DIAS, Rodrigo de Castro. Crítica e os momentos críticos: De la Justification e a guinada pragmática na sociologia francesa. Mana, v. 22, n.1, pp. 67-99, 2016.
DEWEY, John. Human Nature and Conduct. Nova York: H. Holt and Company, 1922.
DEWEY, John. The public and its problems. Nova York: H. Holt and Company, 1927.
DEWEY, John. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Nova York: H. Holt and Company, 1938
GUSFIELD, Joseph. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking, driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1981.
MEAD, George Herbert. The Working Hypothesis in Social Reform. The American Journal of Sociology, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 367-371, 1899.
MEAD, George Herbert.The Philosophy of the Present. In: MURPHY, Arthur (org.). Chicago: Open Court, 1932.
MEAD, George Herbert. The Philosophy of the Act. In: MORRIS, Charles (org.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.
PARK, Robert. The Immigrant Press and its Control. Nova York: Harper, 1922.
PARK, Robert. Human Nature and Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, v. 32, n. 5, pp. 695-703, 1927.
PARK, Robert. The City as Social Laboratory. In: Smith, Thomas; White, Leonard (Orgs.). Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929. pp. 1-19.
QUÉRÉ Louis. Le public comme forme et comme modalité d’expérience. In: CEFAÏ, Daniel; PASQUIER, Dominique (orgS.). Les sens du public: Publics politiques, publics médiatiques. Paris: PUF, 2003.
QUÉRÉ Louis. Por uma abordagem pragmatista dos acontecimentos: Entrevista com Louis Quéré. [Entrevista concedida à] Leandro Rodrigues Lage e Tiago Barcelos Pereira Salgado. ECO: Revista do Programa de Pós-Gradução da Escola de Comunicação da UFRJ, v.14, n.2, 2011, pp. 176-183
SALES, Lilian. O Conceito de Controvérsia em Perspectiva. Relatório de Pós-Doutorado. São Paulo: FAPESP, 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Aurora