The Think Tanks and the strategic debate on emerging countries
the CFR, the liberal order and Putin’s Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.02.p9Keywords:
V. Putin, Russia, Foreign Affairs, CFRAbstract
O problema de pesquisa do presente artigo é: como a Rússia e a ordem mundial são descritas pelo Thinktanknorte-americanoCouncilonForeignRelations? A hipótese de trabalho é a de que: os padrões discursivos do CFR em relação à Rússia e à ordem mundial estão sintonizados com os seus valores liberais e, portanto, buscam moldá-las a estes valores. Diante disso, objetivo geral deste trabalho é descrever e analisar como a Rússia - de Putin - e a ordem - liberal - são representadas em dois dossiês temáticos da revista Foreign Affairs, publicada pelo CFR. Apresentam-se, então, dois objetivos específicos: i) analisar os padrões de consenso e dissenso discursivo acerca das duas temáticas em cada um dos dossiês e; ii) analisar as possíveis hipóteses relacionadas ao predomínio de um determinado padrão discursivo encontrado nos dossiês.Downloads
References
BULL, Hedley. A sociedade anárquica: um estudo da ordem na política mundial. São Paulo: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 2002.
ABELSON, Donald. A capitol idea: think tanks and US foreign policy. Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006.
CASTELLANO DA SILVA, Igor. Política Externa Na África Austral: Causas Das Mudanças Nos Padrões de Cooperação-Conflito (1975-2010). Tese de Doutorado, PPG de Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, 2015.
COX, Robert W.; SINCLAIR, Timothy J. Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
GILPIN, Robert. War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
GURIEV, Sergei. Russia’s Constrained Economy How the Kremlin Can Spur Growth. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 18 22.
HAASS, Richard. World Order 2.0: the Case for Sovereign Obligation.Foreign Affairs, v. 96, n. 1, Jan/Feb 2016, p. 02-09
HANSEN, Lene. Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London/New York: Routledge, 2006.
HURRELL, Andrew. Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? International Affairs,v. 1,n.82, 2006, p. 1-19.
IKENBERRY, Gilford J. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton University Press, 2001.
IKENBERRY, G. John (Org.). Power, Order, and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
KOTKIN, Stephen. Russia’s Perpetual Geopolitics Putin Returns to the Historical Pattern. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 02-09.
KRAUTHAMMER, Charles. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, v. 70, n. 1, Winter 1990, p. 23-33.
LEMKE, Douglas.Regions of War and Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
LIPMAN, Maria. How Putin Silences Dissent: Inside the Kremlin’s Crackdown. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 38-46.
LUKYANOV, Fyodor. Putin’s Foreign Policy: The Quest to Restore Russia’s Rightful Place. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 30-37.
MAZARR, Michael J. The Once and Future Order: what Comes After Hegemony? Foreign Affairs, v. 96, n. 1, Jan/Feb 2016, p. 25-32.
MAZARR, Michael; PRIEBE, Miranda; RADIN, Andrew; CEVALLOS, Astrid Stuth. Understanding the Current International Order, Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, 2016.
MCGANN, James G. 2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. 2017. Disponível em: http:// repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12. Acessoem: 22 mar. 2017
NIBLETT, Robin. Liberalism in Retreat: the Demise of a Dream.Foreign Affairs, v. 96, n. 1, Jan/Feb 2016, p. 17-24.
NYE, Joseph S. Will the Liberal Order Survive? The History of an Idea.Foreign Affairs, v. 96, n. 1, Jan/Feb 2016, p. 10-16.
PARMAR, Inderjeet. Think tanks and power in foreign policy: a comparative study of the role and influence of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1939–1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004a.
PARMAR, Inderjeet. Institutes of international affairs: their roles in foreign policy-making, opinion mobilization and unofficial diplomacy. In: Stone, Daiane; Denham, Andrew (eds.). Think tank traditions: policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester: Manchester university Press, 2004b.
PAVLOVSKY, Gleb. Sistema will outlast Putin. Russian Politics Under Putin The System Will Outlast the Master. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 10-17.
PREUSSER DE MATTOS, Fernando. O Brasil no Debate Estratégico Franco-Alemão: uma Análise do Discurso dos Principais Think Tanks da Alemanha e da França a Respeito da Inserção Internacional Do Brasil (2003-2014). 104f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, IFCH, PPG em Ciência Política, Porto Alegre, 2016.
ROSENAU, James N.; CZEMPIEL, Ernst-Otto (Org.). Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
SCHAKE, Kori. Will Washington Abandon the Order? The False Logic of Retreat.Foreign Affairs, v. 96, n. 1, Jan/Feb 2016, p. 41-47.
SCHWELLER, Randall L. The Problem of International Order Revisited: A Review Essay. International Security, v. 26, n. 1, Summer, 2001, p. 161-186.
SJR. Scientific Journal Rankings. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?country=US&category=3320. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2017.
SVARTMAN, Eduardo Munhoz. Os thinktanks dos EUA e as visões sobre a atuação internacional do Brasil. Relacionesinternacionales, v.25, 2016, p.171-187.
TREISMAN, Daniel. Why Putin Took Crimea: The Gambler in the Kremlin. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 47-55.
TRENIN, Dmitri.The Revival of the Russian Military: How Moscow Reloaded. Foreign Affairs, v. 95, n. 3, May/June 2016, p. 23-19.
VEZIRGIANNIDOU, Sevasti-Eleni. The United States and rising powers in a post-hegemonic global order. InternationalAffairs, v. 3, n. 89, 2013, p. 635–651.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Augusto César Dall’Agnol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Journal Policy
Authors retain copyright over the published article, and Revista Aurora holds the right of first publication. The Journal adopts the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International license, which is used internationally by leading open access journals and publishers. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, while giving appropriate credit to the original authors and the initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted to enter into separate additional contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish in an institutional repository, on a personal website, to publish a translation, or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.