O Conhecimento e a construção de ameaças
PDF

Palavras-chave

Poder
Conhecimento
“Dilema normativo”
Ameaça

Como Citar

FORNER, C. N. O Conhecimento e a construção de ameaças: reflexões sobre os impactos sociopolíticos do “dilema normativo” da segurança. Revista Aurora, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 113–130, 2018. DOI: 10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.08.p113. Disponível em: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7654. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Esse artigo busca compreender os impactos políticos do conhecimento e seus desdobramentos sobre os processos de construção de ameaças, tais quais descritos na literatura construtivista de segurança internacional. Para tanto, o trabalho encontra-se alicerçado na revisão bibliográfica e problematização de teóricos que equacionam, em alguma medida, a dinâmica do binômio poder-conhecimento, a saber, Michel Foucault e Pierre Bourdieu e seus correspondentes no campo das Relações Internacionais, como Peter M. Haas e JefHuysmans.
https://doi.org/10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.08.p113
PDF

Referências

ADLER, Emanuel. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post- Cold War Transformation, European Journal of International Relations 14 (2), 2008: 195-230.

ADLER, Emanuel. The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control. International Organization. Vol. 46, No. 1, Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination (Winter, 1992), pp. 101-145.

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Estado de Exceção. Boitempo Editorial: São Paulo, 2004.

BALZACQ, Thierry. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 11(2), 2005. p. 171–201.

BIGO, Didier. When Two Become One. Internal and External Securitizations in Europe. In: KELSTRUP, Marten; WILLIAMS, Michael C. (Eds), International relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. London: Routledge, 2000.

BIGO, Didier. Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of practices, practices of power, International Political Sociology, Vol. 5, 2011, p. 225-258.

BOURDIEU, P., SAPIRO, G., & MCHALE, B. (1991). Fourth Lecture. Universal Corporatism: The Role of Intellectuals in the Modern World. Poetics Today, 12(4), 655–669. http://doi.org/10.2307/1772708.

CROSS, Mai’a K. Davis. Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later, Review of International Studies 39 (1), 2013: 137-60.

CROSS, Mai’a K. Davis. The Military Dimension of European Security: An Epistemic Community Approach, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 42 (1), 2013: 45-64.

ERIKSSON, Johan. Observers or advocates? On the political role of security analysts. Cooperation and Conflict. 1999, vol 34 (3), pp. 311-330.

GHECIU, Alexandra. Secutity Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the “New Europe”, International Organization, 59 (4), 2005: 973-1012.

HUYSMANS, Jef. Language and the mobilisation of security expectations. The normative dilemma of speaking and writing security. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop Redefining Security, Mannheim, 26-31 March 1999.

MAQUIAVEL, Nicolau. O príncipe. Edtitora L&PM: Porto Alegre, 1999.

McSWEENEY, Bill. Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Cap. 6. The social constructionist approach.

POULIOT, Vincent. The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization. Vol. 62, No. 2 (Spring, 2008), pp. 257-288.

POULIOT, Vincent. International Security in Practice. The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Introdução.

RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas. Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War, International Organization, 48 (2): 1994 185-214.

SAINT-PIERRE, Héctor Luis. “Defesa” ou “Segurança”? Reflexões em torno de conceitos e ideologias. In: Contexto Internacional, vol 33 (2), 2011, 408-433.

SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Introdução. In: SANTOS & MENESES, Boaventura de Sousa; Maria Paula (orgs.). Epistemologias do Sul. Edições Almedina: Coimbra, 2009.

WAEVER, Ole. Still a Discipline AfterAllThese Debates? In: DUNNE, T.; KURKI, M. and SMITH, S. (Orgs) International Relations Theories: discipline and diversity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurora

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.