Brasil

structural crisis, pandemics, social policies and the harsh economic reality

Authors

  • Adilson Marques Gennari UNESP Campus de Araraquara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/2675-3871.2020.v1n03.p18-49

Keywords:

structural crisis, pandemic, technological revolution, social policies, transition

Abstract

In the first decades of the 21st century, capital is in the middle of a long Kondratiev cycle. However, this cycle has peculiarities that differentiate it from the previous ones: a) it is the first time that capital is in structural crisis, b) the global ruling class has no alternative but to deepen the current neoliberal model in crisis, c) the fourth ongoing industrial revolution, as well as the previous ones, will have a strong impact on changing both the productive forces and the social relations of production with substantial changes in the world of work, but this time with a rupture component that places capitalism at its structural limits; d) social policies to combat poverty and social inequality, which have existed since the 18th century, now appear as a fundamental element for the existence of both the society in crisis and the survival capacity of millions of individuals around the world. This implies structural changes in the relations of production and social relations beyond the paradigm of modernity in crisis. In Brazil today, after the consequences of the 2016 coup that deposed President Dilma Rousseff and after almost two years of the economic and social policy of the Bolsonaro-Guedes Government, Brazil finds itself in a situation of brutal worsening in socio economics indicators.

Author Biography

  • Adilson Marques Gennari, UNESP Campus de Araraquara

    Professor at FCLAr / UNESP; PhD in Social Sciences from IFCH / UNICAMP and Coordinator of the Research Group on Contemporary Economic History (GPHEC / FCLAr / UNESP).

Published

2020-10-21

How to Cite

Brasil: structural crisis, pandemics, social policies and the harsh economic reality. (2020). Revista Fim Do Mundo, 1(03), 18-49. https://doi.org/10.36311/2675-3871.2020.v1n03.p18-49