Differences and integration of political thought between ancient Chinese Confucianism and legalism

Auteurs-es

  • Dongwang Liu Tongji University

Mots-clés :

Political philosophy, Confucianism, Legalism, Integration of Confucianism and Legalism

Résumé

Confucianism and Legalism are not only the two most influential ideological schools in pre-Qin China but also the main schools of thought in ancient Chinese intellectual history. This is due to their respective social nature and contrasting political values. In Pre-Qin Confucianism, rooted in the belief in the innate goodness of human nature, there is a strong emphasis on the significance of historical traditions. It promotes values such as benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom, and seeks to redefine “Rite” by incorporating new values. It places great importance on the rule of virtue and aspires to achieve a state of Universal Harmony. Pre-Qin Legalism, driven by the inherent human inclination towards self-interest and personal gain, formulates a governance philosophy grounded in utilitarianism. It prioritizes the present and advocates for profound transformations through the implementation of strict “law” to attain national prosperity and military strength. As a result, ancient China formed different traditions of the rule of virtue and law, laying the foundation for the complementary nature of Confucianism and Legalism. This article analyzes the factors of differentiation and the process of integration in Confucian and legalist political philosophy, aiming to provide insights into the construction of contemporary political philosophical systems.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

  • Dongwang Liu, Tongji University

    School of Political Science & International Relations, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 – China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5165-9012.

Références

CHI, W. Guanzi. Kunming: Yunnan Education, 2009. p. 10, 55.

CONFUCIUS, Analects of. Wei Zheng. Edited by Zhang Nanqiao. Zhengzhou: Henan People’s Publishing House, 2019.

CONFUCIUS. Analects of Confucius. Edited by N. Zhang. Zhengzhou: Henan People’s, 2019. p. 11, 32.

GAO, H. Annotation and translation of Shang Junshu. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2011. p. 10, 96.

HENGLIN. “Shang Junshu” state governance viewpoint and traditional social form orientation. Academics, v. 279, n. 08, 129-137, 2021.

JIA, Y. Comparison and enlightenment of confucianism and legalism. Popular Literature and Art, v. 16, p. 273-274, 2019.

KONG, X.; ZHOU, X. Confucian political view of “virtue dominates punishment and auxiliary”. Lantai World, v. 389, n. 03, p. 61-62, 2013.

LI, J. Xunzi and the Legalists: Aiding the law into confucianism and the separation and combination of Ideas – Also on the relationship between Xunzi, Han Fei, and Li Si. Theoretical Journal, v. 279, n. 05, p. 103-111, 2018.

LI, Y. The consideration of moral factors from the perspective of politics——A comparison of philosophical thoughts of Xun and Han. Humanities Magazine, v. 312, n. 04, p. 23-31, 2022.

LIN, X. On the Identity in the Opposition of Confucianism, Legalism, and Taoism. Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), v. 04, p. 58-60, 1999.

LUO, Y. On Han Fei’s theory of evil nature and the inner logic of severe punishment thought. Legal System and Society, v. 09, p. 9-10, 2011.

MENCIUS. Annotated by Q. Zhao. Beijing: Huaxia, 2017. p. 02, 57.

MENCIUS. Gongsun Chou Shang. Annotated by Zhao, Qingwen. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2017.

MENCIUS. Gongsun Chou Shang. Annotated by Zhao, Qingwen. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2017.

MENCIUS. Li Lou Shang. Annotated by Zhao, Qingwen. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2017.

REN, J. YUAN, G. “National politics” and confucianism and legalism. Academics, v. 07, p. 45-53, 2019.

SHANG Junshu. Written by W. Zhi. Changsha: Yuelu, 2011. p. 11, 66.

SHANG, Yang. The Book of Lord Shang Hua Ce. Edited by Zhi, Weicheng. Changsha: Yuelu Press, 2011.

SONG, H. Between order and justice – On the ideal politics of pre-qin confucianism and legalism and its realization ways. Social Science Research, v. 04, p. 126-133, 2009.

SONG, Y.; WANG, Z. “Confucianism and legalism” in pre-qin political and legal thought. Xinjiang Social Sciences, v. 05, p. 95-100, 2012.

WANG, H. The Book of Rites. Changchun: Jilin University Press, 2021. p. 04, 15.

WANG, T. The Connotation of Confucian “Rite” and Its Contemporary Value. Journal of Theory, v. 04, p. 101-103, 2007.

XIA, H. From evil human nature to law, technique, and power: On the main purpose of Han Fei’s thought. Confucian Academy, v. 8, n. 04, p. 88-99, 201-212, 2021.

XUNZI. Selected Notes by S. Ye; edited by Z. Wan. Wuhan: Chongwen, 2014. p. 09, 87.

YAN, Z.; LONG, C. On Li Gou's Inheritance and Transcendence of Xunzi’s Thoughts on Etiquette and Law. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), v. 42, 01, p. 7-12, 2023.

ZENG, XIangxu. Influence of Emperor Xuan of the Han Dynasty on Confucianism in the Western Han Dynasty. Guangxi Social Sciences, v. 04, p. 119-123.

ZHANG, Q. Han Feizi. Shenyang: Liaohai, 2016. p. 05, 69.

ZHANG, Qian. Han Feizi. Shenyang: Liaohai Publishing House, 2016.

ZHAO, Q. Evil nature, legalism, and rule of man. Qinghai Social Sciences, v. 01, p. 123-125, 2006.

ZUO Zhuan. Edited by C. Wang. Beijing: Enterprise Management, 2012. p. 12, 25.

Received: 10/07/2023 - Approved: 18/082023 - Published: 10/01/2024

Publié

2024-01-05

Comment citer

Differences and integration of political thought between ancient Chinese Confucianism and legalism. (2024). TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO:/Revista/De/Filosofia, 47(4), e0240042. https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14845