The actualization of loneliness in modern philosophy

Autori

  • Beken Balapashev L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
  • Aigul Tursynbayeva L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
  • Ainur Zhangaliyeva L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

Parole chiave:

Irrationalism, Individual, Abstraction, Anthropocentrism, Depression

Abstract

The research relevance is predefined by loneliness being one of the key issues in contemporary philosophy. The research aims to determine the role of loneliness in modern philosophy and the views on the phenomenon. The following methods of theoretical knowledge were used in the research: analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, concretization and generalization. As a result of the research, several conclusions were made, in particular, it was determined what role was played by the theme of loneliness in different periods, such as Antiquity, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and Modernity. The modern classification of loneliness was considered, and it was determined which of its types are positive and which are negative, as well as what the relationship between them is. The objective factors of loneliness prevalence in the world today are identified. The research introduces a new perspective on loneliness in modern philosophy and demonstrates the interrelation between different kinds of loneliness and a person’s spiritual state.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Biografie autore

Beken Balapashev, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

Department of Philosophy, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010008, Astana – Republic of Kazakhstan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7744-2008.

Aigul Tursynbayeva, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

Department of Philosophy, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010008, Astana – Republic of Kazakhstan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-2685.

Ainur Zhangaliyeva, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

Department of Philosophy, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010008, Astana – Republic of Kazakhstan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-5844.

Riferimenti bibliografici

ARIEW, R. Modern philosophy: An anthology of primary sources. New York: Hackett, 2019. 904 p.

AURELIUS, M. Meditations. South Carolina: Create Space, 2018. 146 p.

BALOYANNIS, J. The philosophy of loneliness. Encephalos, v. 52, n. 1, p. 14-24, 2020.

BARCLAY, K.; CHALUS, E.; SIMONTON, D. The Routledge History of Loneliness. 1st ed.). London: Routledge, 2023, 312 p.

BRYAN, E. Marcus Aurelius: Self-help from a roman emperor-philosopher. Queens Quarterly, v. 128, n. 2, p. 188-191, 2021.

BUETOW, S. From Loneliness to Solitude in Person-centred Health Care. 1. ed. London: Routledge, 2022.

CHAKRABORTI, S. Spinning loneliness: Coronavirus and the philosopher. Sophia, v. 60, n. 3, p. 769-784, 2021.

CHUNG, J. K. Christian Contextualization in Korea. In: KWON, H.-Y. (ed.). Korean Cultural Roots: Religion and Social Thoughts. Chicago: North Park University Press, 1995. p. 81-104. Retrieved from https://iucat.iu.edu/iusb/7753026.

CHUNG, J. K.; JEONG, M. J.; PARK, Y. H.; HAGA, K. Y. A.; KANG, H. H.; KIM, H. W. UBF Sogam and Its Spiritual and Social Implications. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), v. 11, n. 10, p. 851-861, 2021. Retrieved from https://rigeo.org/article-view/?id=1464.

DOSSANOVA, N.; ABDIMANULY, O.; MAULENOV, A.; KARBOZOV, Y.; MATBEK, N. Cultural interaction in the works of M. Zhumabayev as the basis for the development of a national literary tradition. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, v. 9, n. 2, p. 41-53, 2021.

EBURY, K. Vivisection in modernist culture and popular fiction, 1890-1945. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature, v. 3, n. 1, p. 397-409, 2021.

FREUD, S. Civilization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010. 192 p.

GILSON, E. History of Christian philosophy in the Middle Ages. Chicago: The Catholic University of America Press, 2019. 850 p.

HARARI, U. N. 21 lessons for the XXI century. London: Vintage, 2018. 400 p.

HEIDEGGER, M. Being and time. Connecticut: Martino Fine Books, 2019. 590 p.

HUGHES, E. Loss, Loneliness, and the Question of Subjectivity in Old Age. Topoi, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-023-09915-4.

ISSAKOVA, S. S. Semantic descriptions of proverbs and sayings with the component numbers (on the material of the Kazakh and French languages). Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, n. 2, p. 96-99, 2015.

JEONG, M. J.; SEO, I. S.; KANG, M. S.; SHIN, C. W.; SEOK, J. O.; CHUNG, Y. B.; CHUNG, J. K. A Critical Analysis on Vladimir Surin’s “Korean Manifesto”. Journal of Positive School Psychology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 3776-3788, 2022. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/2173/1342.

KENNY, A. The rise of modern philosophy: a new history of western philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 356 p.

KIM, W. John Cowper Powys and the inhuman wordsworth. European Romantic Review, v. 28, n. 6, p. 773-788, 2017.

LEDERMAN, Z. Loneliness at the age of COVID-19. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2022, 108540.

MONISA, R. Loneliness as an avenue for mental detox to reconfigure the self. ECS Transactions, v. 107, n. 1, article n. 14135, 2020.

NURGAZINA, A. B.; RAKHIMZHANOV, K. H.; AKOSHEVA, M. K.; IBRAEVA, Z. B.; SHAIKOVA, G. K.; ZHUSUPOV, N. K.; BARATOVA, M. N.; SAKENOV, J. Z. About the poetic text and a concept as ways of representation of author’s subjectivity and modality. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, v. 11, n. 18, p. 11757-11770, 2016.

NUSIPALIKYZY, A.; ALMASBEK, M.; DOSBOL, B.; KOSHENOVA, T. I.; MEKEBAEVA, L. A. Echoes of the Turkic world and folklore in the holy book avesta. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, v. 12, n. 4, article n. 28, 2020.

POWYS, J. A philosophy of solitude. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1933. 233 p.

QUODBAH, J. Happiness and social behavior. Psychological Science, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1111-1122, 2019.

ROSS, A. Down to earth: Martin Heidegger, Le Corbusier, and the question of dwelling, essentially. Architectural Histories, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2021.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. On the suffering of the world. London: Repeater, 2020. 322 p.

SEO, I. S.; SHIN, C. W.; GUK, J. M.; HAGA, K. Y. A.; JEONG, M. J.; CHUNG, J. K. To Be the Christian Beacon in the Far East: A Comparative Study on the Development of the Early Protestantism in China, Japan, and Korea (1850-1950). Review of International Geographical Education Online, v. 11, n. 7, p. 1407-1421, 2021.

SHIELDS, D. Ancient philosophy. London: Routledge, 2012. 264 p.

STATISTA. Loneliness among adults in selected countries as of 2021. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1222815/loneliness-among-adults-by-country/

TEMIRGAZINA, Z. K.; IBRAEVA, Z. B. An Observer in Poetic Narrative (In the Poems of Pavel Vasiliev). Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Filologiya, n. 72, p. 290-307, 2021.

TUKHTAROVA, A. S.; ISSAKOVA, S. S.; TOXANBAYEVA, T. ZH.; AITBAYEVA, N. K.; ALBEKOVA, A. SH. Linguocultural deviations in russian translation of the novel “twilight” by s. Meyer. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, v. 9, n. 2, p. 189-202, 2021.

UNGUREANU, D. The value of loneliness. Journal of World Literature, v. 7, n. 1, p. 108-126, 2022.

Received: 16/03/2023

Approved: 04/04/2023

Pubblicato

2023-09-11

Come citare

Balapashev, B., Tursynbayeva, A., & Zhangaliyeva, A. (2023). The actualization of loneliness in modern philosophy. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista De Filosofia, 46(4), 25–42. Recuperato da https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14375

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli e Recensioni