Bas van Fraassen’s Philosophy of Science and His Epistemic Voluntarism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44n4.30.p399

Keywords:

Anti-realism, Constructive empiricism, Empiricist structuralism, Epistemic voluntarism, van Fraassen

Abstract

Bas van Fraassen’s anti-realist account of science has played a major role in shaping recent philosophy of science. His constructive empiricism, in particular, has been widely discussed and criticized in the journal literature and is a standard topic in philosophy of science course curricula. Other aspects of his empiricism are less well known, including his empiricist account of scientific laws, his relatively recent re-evaluation of what it is to be an empiricist, and his empiricist structuralism. This essay attempts to provide an overview of these diverse aspects of van Fraassen’s empiricism and to show how they relate to one another. It also focuses on the nature of van Fraassens’s epistemic voluntarism and its relationship to his empiricist philosophy of science.

Author Biography

  • Alessio Gava, Universidade Estadual do Paraná (UNESPAR) – campus Apucarana
    Alessio Gava, mestre e doutor em Lógica e Filosofia da Ciência pela UFMG, formado em Física pela “Università di Trieste” (Itália), professor de matemática junto à Universidade Estadual do Paraná - Campus de Apucarana.

References

CHURCHLAND, P. M.; HOOKER, C. A. (ed.). Images of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

CLIFFORD, W. K. The ethics of belief. In: MADIGAN, T. (ed.). The ethics of belief and other essays. Amherst, MA: Prometheus, 1877 [1999]. p. 70–96.

MONTON, B. (ed.). Images of Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

MONTON, B.; MOHLER, C. Constructive Empiricism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Winter 2012 ed. Ed. Edward. N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, 2012. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/constructive- empiricism. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.

OKRUHLIK, K. Critical Notice: Bas van Fraassen, Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, v. 39, n. 4, p. 671-694, 2009.

OKRUHLIK, K. Science, Sex, and Pictures: Reflections on van Fraassen’s Use of Perspectival Representations. In: GAO, G.; LIU, C. (ed.). Scientific Explanation and Methodology of Science. Singapore: World Scientific, 2014. p. 156-169.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space. New York: Random House, 1970.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Belief and the Will. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 81, n. 5, p. 235-256, 1984.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Recebido: 14/5/2020 - Aceito: 03/8/2020

Published

2021-10-22 — Updated on 2022-07-04

Issue

Section

Translation

How to Cite

Bas van Fraassen’s Philosophy of Science and His Epistemic Voluntarism. (2022). Trans/Form/Ação, 44(4), 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44n4.30.p399