Questa è una versione superata pubblicata il 2022-11-28. Visita la versione più recente.

PAUL AUSTER AND AUGUST BRILL’S SOLITARY ROOMS

THE SPATIALITY OF SOLITUDE

Autori

  • Ru Chen School of Foreign Studies, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics
  • Song Liu School of Foreign Studies, Hunan University of Finance & Economics
  • Jiaxin Lin School of Foreign Studies, Northwestern Polytechnical University
  • Muhammad Khail Kan The Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45n4.p183

Parole chiave:

Paul Auster, rooms, spatiality of solitude, intersubjectivity, Man in the Dark.

Abstract

For Paul Auster, a room is in essence “the substance of solitude itself”, a spatially defined solitude. In this respect, the phenomenon has transcended its physical limitations and assumed existential and philosophical significance. In his writings, a room is first and foremost an architectural space that a solitary writer occupies; besides, it is metaphorized as the mind that is the room—an intellectually constructed space; and lastly, it is a place narrated in his stories where his characters meditate and compose, a space that exists in words. This paper conducts studies on both Auster’s life writings and one of his fictions, Man in the Dark, in the hope of presenting the complexity of the three forms of solitary rooms and their mutual inclusion in intersubjective solitude.

Biografia autore

  • Song Liu, School of Foreign Studies, Hunan University of Finance & Economics

    For Paul Auster, a room is in essence “the substance of solitude itself”, a spatially defined solitude. In this respect, the phenomenon has transcended its physical limitations and assumed existential and philosophical significance. In his writings, a room is first and foremost an architectural space that a solitary writer occupies; besides, it is metaphorized as the mind that is the room—an intellectually constructed space; and lastly, it is a place narrated in his stories where his characters meditate and compose, a space that exists in words. This paper conducts studies on both Auster’s life writings and one of his fictions, Man in the Dark, in the hope of presenting the complexity of the three forms of solitary rooms and their mutual inclusion in intersubjective solitude.

Riferimenti bibliografici

ADAMO, C. Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today, v. 46, n. 3, p. 32-65, 2002.

ALFORD, S. Spaced-out: Signification and Space in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy. Contemporary Literature, v. 36, n. 4, p. 13-25, 1995.

ALLEN, B. Merleau-Ponty: Beauty, Phenomenology, and the “Theological Turn”. Theory, Culture & Society, v. 26, n. 3, p. 15-33, 2020.

ALLOA, E.; CHOURAQUI, F.; KAUSHIK, R. Merleau-Ponty and Contemporary Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York, 2019. p. 165-175.

AUSTER, P. The Art of Hunger. London: Penguin Books, 1998. p. 342-358.

AUSTER, P. Collected Prose. Picador USA: New York: Picador, 2005. p. 62-115.

AUSTER, P. Report from the Interior. London: Faber and Faber, 2014. p. 270.

BALSHAW, M.; KENNEDY, L. Urban Space and Representation. London: Pluto, 1999. p. 404-423.

BOETTCHER, N. Identity Formation in Paul Auster’s Fiction Urban Space. Romanian Journal of English Studies, v. 10, n. 1, p. 221-234, 2013.

BROWN, M. Paul Auster. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007. p. 371-387.

CROSSLEY, N. Mead, Merleau-Ponty and Embodied Communication. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 58, n. 10, p. 46-58, 2013.

EVINK, E. Surrender and Subjectivity: Merleau-Ponty and Patočka on Intersubjectivity. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics. Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy, v.1, n. 7, p. 13-24, 2013.

FOUCAULT, M.; MISKOWIEC, J. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16, v. 1, n. 4, p. 22-29, 1986.

KHAZAEI, M.; FARID P. Lacanian Trauma & Tuché in Pual Auster’s Man in the Dark. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, v. 4, n. 4, p. 211-216, 2015.

KOCH, P. A Philosophical Encounter. London: Open Court, 1994. p. 264-268.

LI, J. The Subject, Language, and the Other – A Research on the Contemporary American Writer Paul Auster. Shanghai: Shanghai Fudan University, 2019. p. 24-28.

LOW, D. Merleau-Ponty and Reconsideration of Alienation. Philosophy Today, v. 54, n. 2, p. 199-214, 2013.

MARRATTO, S. Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity. New York: Albany State University of New York Press, 2012. p. 61-367.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. Signs Trans. Illinois: Northwestern University, 1964. p. 311-313.

MILDORF, J. Autobiography, the Literary, and the Everyday in Paul Auster’s Report from the Interior. Partial Answers, v. 17, n. 1, p. 125-131, 2019.

MONTAIGNE, M. The Complete Essays. London: Penguin Classics, 2003. p. 201-211.

PANZANI, U. The Insistent Realism of Don DeLillo’s Falling Man and Paul Auster’s Man in the Dark. Altre Modernità, v. 2, n. 11, p. 76-84, 2011.

PEACOCK, J. Understanding Paul Auster. Carolin: University of South Carolina Press, p. 64-76, 2010.

PRIEST, S. Merleau-Ponty. London and New York: Routledge, 1998. p. 131-145.

SIEGUMFELDT, I.; HUGONNIER, F.; AUSTER, P. Interview with Paul Auster. LISA (Caen, France), v. 18, n. 50, p. 35-51, 2020.

TALLY, R. Spatiality, London and New York: Routledge, 2013. p. 54-79.

WOODS, T. Looking for Signs in the Air: Urban Space and the Postmodern in the Country of Last Things. Harold Bloom. Michigan: Chelsea House, 2003. p. 414-432.

Received: 01/06/2022 Approved: 25/08/2022

Pubblicato

2022-09-14 — Aggiornato il 2022-11-28

Versioni

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli e Recensioni

Come citare

PAUL AUSTER AND AUGUST BRILL’S SOLITARY ROOMS: THE SPATIALITY OF SOLITUDE. (2022). TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO:/Revista/De/Filosofia, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45n4.p183