Heresia confucionista e imaginação religiosa: um estudo das interpretações de Mozi por missionários do protestantismo no século XIX

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Mozi, Missionários do protestantismo, Cristianismo, Confucionismo

Resumo

Como uma heresia confucionista, Mozi inicialmente chamou a atenção do missionário inglês Joseph Edkins, em 1858. Posteriormente, o missionário holandês Johann Jakob Maria de Groot traduziu a Doutrina Funerária de Mozi, que tem fortes tonalidades religiosas. Joseph e Groot, que representavam os missionários do protestantismo, interpretaram Mozi em uma variedade de narrativas teológicas. Os dois missionários, que procuravam conexões entre Mozi e o cristianismo, consideravam Mozi um cânone teológico, contendo doutrina cristã. Eles também atacaram o confucionismo, a antítese do cristianismo, apontando que Mozi era um herege, na tradição confuciana. Através dessa imaginação religiosa sobre Mozi, mais missionários e sinologistas se juntaram à tradução de Mozi, e a jornada da transmissão do cânone para o Ocidente começou.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Jiaxin Lin, Northwestern Polytechnical University

School of Foreign Studies, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710129 - China, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-9471.

Zihan Yu, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics

School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, 510655 - China, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0102-3442.

Honghui Hu, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics

School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, 510655 - China, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-7033.

Referências

CHIU, W. W. Assessment of Li in the Mencius and the Mozi. Dao-A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, v. 13, p. 199-214, 2014.

CHU, L. J. On the English Translation of Jian’ai by Late Qing Missionary-Sinologists. Journal of Chinese Humanities, v. 7, n. 1-2, p. 161-184, 2021.

DE GROOT, J. J. M. The Religious System of China, Its Ancient Forms, Evolution, History and Present Aspect, Manners. Custom and Social Institutions Connected in addition to that, rpt. New York, v. 6, p. 1892-1910, 1969.

DULSKIS, R. Doctrinal Analogies and Differences between Confucianism and Christianity in the Outlook of Interreligious Dialogue. Logos-Vilniu, v. 78, p. 45-63, 2014.

EDKINS, J. Notices of the Character and Writings of Meh Tsi. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, v. 5, p. 155-159, 1858.

FANG, C. Z. Chinese Culture in Enlightenment England. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education, p. 12-12, 1991.

GROOT. The Religious System of China II: The Grave. Leiden: Brill Archive, 1894. p. 770-780.

LIN, J. X.; LIU, S. The Translation and Research of Mozi in the English-speaking World. Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature, v. 8, p. 203-210, 2021.

NAVARRETE, F. D. Casanatense Library. Ms. 1074. Sunday. The history, politics, ethics and religious treaties of China’s Monarchy. Madrid: The Royal Printing House of Juan Garcia Ivanson, 1676.

PARK, M. H. The Military Thought of Mohist. Unification Strategy, v. 10, p. 155-190, 2010.

RAJIVA, J. Secrecy, Sacrifice, and God on the Island: Christianity and Colonialism in Coetzee’s Foe and Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. Twentieth Century Literature, v. 63, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2017.

REX, R. The Morning Star or the Sunset of the Reformation? Bulletin of The John Rylands Library, v. 90, n. 1, p. 7-23, 2014.

RYAN, D. Fuzhou Protestants and the Making of a Modern China, 1857-1927. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001. p. 1857-1927.

SLOYAN, G. S. The origins of Christianity: An exploration. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, v. 62, n. 3, p. 560-563, 2000.

SUH, D. W. A Study of Mozi’s Personality. Journal of The Society of philosophical studies, v. 123, p. 199-237, 2014.

WEI, C. H. A Discussion from “Conversations” of Mozi’s Philosophical Idea on Questioning and Answering in Philosophy of Children’s Practices. Universitas-Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture, v. 49, p. 101-116, 2022.

WINANS, R. B. Folk, stage, and 5-string banjo in 19th-century. Journal of American Folklore, v. 89, n. 354, p. 407-437, 1976.

WONG, J. Y. C. John of Lancaster’s Negotiation with the Rebels in 2 Henry IV Fifteenth-Century Northern England as Sixteenth-Century Ireland. Critical Survey, v. 30, n. 1, p. 45-66, 2018.

WON, Y. J. A Study of Mozi’s Saint. Journal of Eastern Philosophy, v. 88, p. 131-153, 2016.

WU, Y.; AMIN, E. A. Is Mohism really li-promotionalism? Asian Philosophy, n. 31, p. 430-440, 2021.

XIE, X. D. One or Two Roots? Yi Zhi and the Dilemma of Practical Reason. Religions, v. 13, p. 23-25, 2022.

YAO, Y. S.; GOMBRICH, R. Christianity as Model and Analogue in the Formation of the ‘Humanistic’ Buddhism of Tai Xu and Hsing Yun. Buddhist Studies Review, v. 34, n. 2, p. 205-237, 2017.

Received: 22/05/2023 - Approved: 12/07/2023 - Published: 10/01/2024

Downloads

Publicado

05-01-2024

Como Citar

Lin, J., Yu, Z., & Hu, H. (2024). Heresia confucionista e imaginação religiosa: um estudo das interpretações de Mozi por missionários do protestantismo no século XIX. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista De Filosofia Da Unesp, 47(4), e0240044. Recuperado de https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/14633

Edição

v. 47 n. 4 (2024): Pensamento oriental

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons.