Confucian heresy and religious imagination: a study of the renderings of Mozi by Protestantism missionaries in 19th century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n4.e0240044Keywords:
Mozi, Protestantism missionaries, Christianity, ConfucianismAbstract
Mozi first came to the English missionary Joseph Edkins’ attention in 1858 as a Confucian heretic. Subsequently, the Dutch missionary Johann Jakob Maria de Groot translated Mozi’s Funerary Doctrine, which has strong religious overtones. Protestantism missionaries were represented by Joseph and Groot, whose renderings of Mozi were replete with theological interpretations. Mozi was imagined as a religious canon, containing Christian doctrine, by the two missionaries who were keen to find commonalities between Mozi and Christianity. They also used Mozi’s status as a Confucian heretic to criticize Confucianism, the archenemy of Christianity. Through this religious imagination of Mozi, more missionaries and sinologists joined Mozi’s translation, and the journey of the canon’s transmission to the West started.
Downloads
References
CHIU, W. W. Assessment of Li in the Mencius and the Mozi. Dao-A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, v. 13, p. 199-214, 2014.
CHU, L. J. On the English Translation of Jian’ai by Late Qing Missionary-Sinologists. Journal of Chinese Humanities, v. 7, n. 1-2, p. 161-184, 2021.
DE GROOT, J. J. M. The Religious System of China, Its Ancient Forms, Evolution, History and Present Aspect, Manners. Custom and Social Institutions Connected in addition to that, rpt. New York, v. 6, p. 1892-1910, 1969.
DULSKIS, R. Doctrinal Analogies and Differences between Confucianism and Christianity in the Outlook of Interreligious Dialogue. Logos-Vilniu, v. 78, p. 45-63, 2014.
EDKINS, J. Notices of the Character and Writings of Meh Tsi. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, v. 5, p. 155-159, 1858.
FANG, C. Z. Chinese Culture in Enlightenment England. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education, p. 12-12, 1991.
GROOT. The Religious System of China II: The Grave. Leiden: Brill Archive, 1894. p. 770-780.
LIN, J. X.; LIU, S. The Translation and Research of Mozi in the English-speaking World. Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature, v. 8, p. 203-210, 2021.
NAVARRETE, F. D. Casanatense Library. Ms. 1074. Sunday. The history, politics, ethics and religious treaties of China’s Monarchy. Madrid: The Royal Printing House of Juan Garcia Ivanson, 1676.
PARK, M. H. The Military Thought of Mohist. Unification Strategy, v. 10, p. 155-190, 2010.
RAJIVA, J. Secrecy, Sacrifice, and God on the Island: Christianity and Colonialism in Coetzee’s Foe and Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. Twentieth Century Literature, v. 63, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2017.
REX, R. The Morning Star or the Sunset of the Reformation? Bulletin of The John Rylands Library, v. 90, n. 1, p. 7-23, 2014.
RYAN, D. Fuzhou Protestants and the Making of a Modern China, 1857-1927. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001. p. 1857-1927.
SLOYAN, G. S. The origins of Christianity: An exploration. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, v. 62, n. 3, p. 560-563, 2000.
SUH, D. W. A Study of Mozi’s Personality. Journal of The Society of philosophical studies, v. 123, p. 199-237, 2014.
WEI, C. H. A Discussion from “Conversations” of Mozi’s Philosophical Idea on Questioning and Answering in Philosophy of Children’s Practices. Universitas-Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture, v. 49, p. 101-116, 2022.
WINANS, R. B. Folk, stage, and 5-string banjo in 19th-century. Journal of American Folklore, v. 89, n. 354, p. 407-437, 1976.
WONG, J. Y. C. John of Lancaster’s Negotiation with the Rebels in 2 Henry IV Fifteenth-Century Northern England as Sixteenth-Century Ireland. Critical Survey, v. 30, n. 1, p. 45-66, 2018.
WON, Y. J. A Study of Mozi’s Saint. Journal of Eastern Philosophy, v. 88, p. 131-153, 2016.
WU, Y.; AMIN, E. A. Is Mohism really li-promotionalism? Asian Philosophy, n. 31, p. 430-440, 2021.
XIE, X. D. One or Two Roots? Yi Zhi and the Dilemma of Practical Reason. Religions, v. 13, p. 23-25, 2022.
YAO, Y. S.; GOMBRICH, R. Christianity as Model and Analogue in the Formation of the ‘Humanistic’ Buddhism of Tai Xu and Hsing Yun. Buddhist Studies Review, v. 34, n. 2, p. 205-237, 2017.
Received: 22/05/2023 - Approved: 12/07/2023 - Published: 10/01/2024
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons license.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.