Lacan x Buber/Paz
between contingent and the eternal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31731987000100006Keywords:
Primal unity, primal mourning, lost object, void, subject of humanism, symbolic order, absolute Other, Being, religion, principle-word, I-THEE, otherness, I-THIS, alienation, dialogicAbstract
A comparison between Lacan's ideas on the one hand, and Buber's and Paz's on the other reveals an absolute incompatibility of positions. According to Lacan, an original unity cannot be recuperated and has never actually existed. Birth imposes a condition of incompleteness upon human beings, bringing about desire and a nostalgic search for a lost object. All human actions are reduced to a search for objects that produce a false satisfaction and joy and replace a basic emptiness with their presence. Conversely, for Buber/Paz, an original unity is established since the beginning and has never ceased to exist. Human actions can awake this unity at each and every moment and in each, and every fact and act of daily life.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1987 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons license.