Lacan x Buber/Paz

between contingent and the eternal

Authors

  • Sílvia Simone Anspach Pontifica Universidade Católica - PUC/SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31731987000100006

Keywords:

Primal unity, primal mourning, lost object, void, subject of humanism, symbolic order, absolute Other, Being, religion, principle-word, I-THEE, otherness, I-THIS, alienation, dialogic

Abstract

A comparison between Lacan's ideas on the one hand, and Buber's and Paz's on the other reveals an absolute incompatibility of positions. According to Lacan, an original unity cannot be recuperated and has never actually existed. Birth imposes a condition of incompleteness upon human beings, bringing about desire and a nostalgic search for a lost object. All human actions are reduced to a search for objects that produce a false satisfaction and joy and replace a basic emptiness with their presence. Conversely, for Buber/Paz, an original unity is established since the beginning and has never ceased to exist. Human actions can awake this unity at each and every moment and in each, and every fact and act of daily life.

Published

1987-01-01 — Updated on 2023-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles and Comments

How to Cite

Lacan x Buber/Paz: between contingent and the eternal. (2023). Trans/Form/Ação, 9, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31731987000100006