The relation between epistemic competence and knowledge in Ernest Sosa’s theory

Authors

  • Kátia Etcheverry Pontifica Universidade Católica - PUC/RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44dossier2.13.p185

Keywords:

Attribution Relation, Competence Condition, Ernest Sosa, Knowledge, Manifestation of Competence, Virtue Reliabilism

Abstract

This paper focuses on the attribution relation between competence and true belief present in epistemic virtue accounts of knowledge such as Sosa’s theory. The core idea is that in cases of knowledge the fact that the agent gets a true belief is attributable to her cognitive competence (competence
condition), and not to some lucky factor. Critics have presented cases where, purportedly, the agent can either have knowledge without satisfying the competence condition (therefore, the competence condition would not be necessary for knowledge), or, despite the satisfaction of the competence condition, the agent has no knowledge (therefore, the competence condition would not be sufficient for knowledge). The crux of the matter lies in how to conceive properly the competence condition for
knowledge, and the underlying relationship between competence and success in the epistemic domain. This paper explores Sosa’s view of this relationship in terms of “cognitive success that manifests the agent’s competence”, and proposes that it provides a more direct answer to the critics than do other epistemic virtue accounts of knowledge.

Author Biography

  • Kátia Etcheverry, Pontifica Universidade Católica - PUC/RS

    Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC/RS), Porto Alegre, RS – Brasil.

References

BAEHR, J. The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

BRONCANO-BERROCAL, F. A robust enough virtue epistemology. Synthese, v. 194, n. 6, p. 2147–2174, 2017.

CHISHOLM, R. Theory of Knowledge. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1977.

GETTIER, E. Is Justified Belief Knowledge? Analysis, v. 23, n. 6, p. 121-123, 1963.

GOLDMAN, Alvin. Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 73, p. 771-91, 1976. (Republicado em GOLDMAN, A. “Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences”. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992. p. 85-103.)

GRECO, J. Knowledge as credit for true belief. In: DePaul, M.; Zagzebski, L. (eds.). Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 111-134, 2003.

GRECO, J. Knowledge and success from ability. Philosophical Studies, v. 142, p. 17–26, 2009.

GRECO, J. Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretical Account of Epistemic Normativity”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

GRECO, John. A (different) virtue epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1–26, 2012.

KELP, C. Knowledge: The Safe-Apt View. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, v. 91, n. 2, p. 265-27, 2013.

LACKEY, J. Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know. Synthese, v. 158, n. 3, p. 345–361, 2007.

LACKEY, J. Knowledge and Credit. Philosophical Studies, v. 142, p. 27–42, 2009.

MIRACCHI, L. Knowledge is all you need. Philosophical Issues, v. 25, p. 353-378, 2015.

MONTMARQUET, J. A. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993.

PRITCHARD, D. Knowledge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

PRITCHARD, D. Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology. In: HADDOCK, A.; MILLAR, A.; PRITCHARD, D. (Eds.) The nature and value of knowledge: three investigations. N. York: Oxford University Press, p. 48-65, 2010.

PRITCHARD, D. Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology. In: The Journal of Philosophy, v. 109, n. 3, p. 247-279, 2012.

SOSA, E. The raft and the pyramid: coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge

Midwest Studies in Philosophy, v. 5, p. 3-25, 1980.

SOSA, E. A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge, vol 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.

SOSA, E. Reflective knowledge: Apt belief and reflective knowledge, vol 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

SOSA, E. How Competence matters in Epistemology. In: Philosophical Perspectives (Epistemology), v.24, p. 465-475, 2010.

SOSA, E. Judgment and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

TURRI, J. Manifest Failure: The Gettier Problem Solved. Philosophers’ Imprint, v. 11, n. 8, p. 1-11, 2011.

TURRI, J. A New Paradigm for Epistemology: From Reliabilism to Abilism. IB, v. 3, n. 8, p. 189-230, 2016.

ZAGZEBSKI, L. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Recebido: 16/9/2020 - Aprovado: 05/3/2021

Published

2021-06-02 — Updated on 2022-06-30

How to Cite

The relation between epistemic competence and knowledge in Ernest Sosa’s theory. (2022). Trans/Form/Ação, 44(Special Issue 2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44dossier2.13.p185