Desplazamiento semántico y contestabilidad esencial de los conceptos: un enfoque desde una negatividad hegeliana restringida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n3.e02400165Parole chiave:
Concepto., Negatividad., Esencia., Reflexión, Contradicción.Abstract
El propósito de este artículo consiste en mostrar cómo la propuesta de W. B. Gallie en torno a la esencial contestabilidad de los conceptos políticos terminó por poner en cuestión la noción misma de contestabilidad esencial propuesta por este autor. A pesar de ello, consideramos que tal noción todavía puede ser un aporte en la historia de los conceptos si es que se complementa con algunos aspectos de la filosofía de Hegel, localizados en su Ciencia de la lógica, que pueden proveer un fundamento para tal contestabilidad a partir de una negatividad auto referida abierta a desplazamientos semánticos, lo que permite recibir la propuesta de Gallie sin tener que aceptar todos sus compromisos teóricos, radicalizando su propuesta y proporcionando algunas indicaciones de utilidad para la historia de los conceptos políticos.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
ABAZARI, Arash. Opposition instead of recognition: The social significance of “determinations of reflection” in Hegel’s Science of Logic. Philosophy and Social Criticism, p. 1-25, 2017.
ARNDT, Andreas. Dialektik und Reflexion.Zur Rekonstruktion des Vernunftbegriffs, Hamburg: Meiner, 1994.
BALL, Terence. Confessions of a Conceptual Historian. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, v. 6, p. 11-31, 2002.
BLACK, Max. Vagueness. An Exercise in Logical Analysis. Philosophy of Science, v. 4, n. 4, p. 427-455, 1937.
BOROMISZA-HABASHI, David. How are political concepts ‘essentially’ contested? Language & Communication, v. 30, p. 276-284, 2010.
CHILTON, Peter. Political Terminology. In: WODAK, Ruth; KOLLER, Veronika (ed.). Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. New York: De Gruyter, 2008.
DAVID-HILLEL, Ruben. W. B. Gallie and Essentially Contested Concepts. Philosophical Papers, v. 39, n. 2, p. 257-270, 2010.
DAVIES, Matt. The Attraction of Opposites: The Ideological Function of Conventional and Created Oppositions in the Construction of In-groups and Out-groups in News Texts. In: JEFFRIES, Lesley; MCINTYRE, Dan; BOUSFIELD, Derek (ed.). Stylistics and Social Cognition. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007.
EVNINE, Simon. Essentially Contested Concepts and Semantic Externalism. Journal of the Philosophy of History, v. 8, p. 118-140, 2014.
FINE, Arthur. Consistency, Derivability, and Scientific Change. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 64, n. 8, p. 231-240, 1967.
FREEDEN, Michael. Political Concepts and Ideological Morphology. The Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 2, n. 2, p. 140- 164, 1994.
FREEDEN, Michael. Practicing Ideologies and Ideological practices. Political Studies, vol. 48, p. 302-322, 2000.
GALLIE, William Bryce. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. v. 56, p. 167-198, 1956.
GIEDYMIN, Jierzy. The Paradox of Meaning Variance. British Journal of Philosophy, p. 257-268, 1970.
GRAFSTEIN, Robert. A realist foundation for essentially contested political concepts. Political Research Quarterly, v. 41, n. 1, p. 9-28, 1987.
HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Ciencia de la lógica. Volumen I: La Lógica Objetiva (1812-1813). Madrid: Abada, 2011
HENRICH, Dieter. Hegel en contexto. Caracas: Monte Ávila, 1990.
HESSE, Mary. Fine's Criteria of Meaning Change Author. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 65, n. 2, p. 46-52, 1968.
HIDALGO, Oliver. Conceptual History and Politics: Is the Concept of Democracy Essentially Contested? Contributions to the History of Concepts, v. 4, p. 176-201, 2008.
JONES, Steven. ‘Opposites’ in Discourse: A Comparison of antonym use across four domains. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 39, p. 1105-1119, 2007.
KNAPPICK, Franz. Hegel’s Essentialism. Natural Kinds and the Metaphysics of Explanation in Hegel’s Theory of ‘the Concept’. European Journal of Philosophy, v. 24, p. 760-787, 2016.
KOCH, Anton Friedrich. Die Selbstbeziehung der Negation in Hegels Logik. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, v. 53, p. 1-29, 1999.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Futuro Pasado. Para una semántica de los tiempos históricos. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997.
KURKI, Milja. Democracy and Conceptual Contestability: Reconsidering Conceptions of Democracy in Democracy Promotion. International Studies Review, v. 3, n. 3, p. 362-386, 2010.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. The essential contestability of some social concepts. Ethics, v. 84, n.1, p. 1-9, 1973.
MASCIARELLI, Pasqualino. On a notion of the extra-essential identity: Critical notes on Russell's objection to Hegel. Topoi. v, 19, n. 2, p. 179-199, 2000.
MURPHY, Lynne; PIAZZA, Roberta. Linguistic Semantics and Historical Semantics. In: JUNGE, Kay; POSTOUTENKO, Kirill (ed.). Asymmetrical concepts after Reinhart Koselleck: historical semantics and beyond. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2011.
NUZZO, Angelica. Hegel and the Analytic Tradition, New York: Continuum, 2011.
PALTÍ, Elías. On the thesis of the essential contestability of concepts, and 19th century Latin American intellectual history. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, v. 9, n. 1, p. 113-134, 2005.
RUBEN, David-Hillel. W. B. Gallie and Essentially Contested Concepts. Philosophical Papers, v. 39, n. 2, p. 257- 270, 2010.
WODAK, Ruth. The Discourse-historical Approach. In: WODAK, Ruth; MEYER, Michael (ed.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 2009.
WOLFF, Michael. Über Hegels Lehre vom Widerspruch. In: HENRICH, Dieter (ed.). Probleme der Hegelschen Logik. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1986.
Recibido: 25/08/2023 - Aprobado: 19/10/2023 - Publicado: 30/04/2024
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.