The Marxist Philosophical Basis of Socialist Literature and Art

Autores/as

  • Zijie Liu Shanghai University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46n3.p255

Palabras clave:

Socialist literature and art, Marxist philosophy, People character, Realism, Aesthetics

Resumen

Socialist literature and art are constructed on the basis of Marxist philosophy. The “people character” of socialist literature and art is based on the fact that Marxist philosophy abandons individualism and focuses on a wider population’s freedom and happiness. Therefore, socialist literature and art take people rather than individuals as the subject of expression. Realism, the basic principle of socialist literary and artistic creation, is based on the materialism of Marxist philosophy. The “typical environment and typical characters” proposed by Marxist classic writers for socialist literary and artistic creation are the method and principle formed by applying the philosophical concepts of the organic combination of the objective world and human subjectivity, and the organic combination of nature and social history to the concrete literary and artistic creation in Marxist theory. Marxist philosophy regards sensibility and aesthetics as important elements for literature and art to play a practical role. It believes that sensibility and aesthetics are not limited to the subjective world of people, but have the possibility of connecting with the external objective world. Therefore, socialist literature and art must pay attention to aesthetics.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Zijie Liu, Shanghai University

    School of Marxism, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 – China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6349-0463.

Referencias

CHEN, Q. A Comparative Study of Hegel, Marx, and Heidegger’s Practical Theories. Western Academic Journal, p. 140-143, 2022.

DING, F. WANG, S. “Seventeen Years” Literature: The Loss of “Man” and “Self”. Reality Only, No. 01 p. 58-64, 1999.

GU, P.F. “People” and the Construction of Socialist Literary Interpretation Community. Literary Review, No. 03, p. 25-33, 2022.

HONG, Z. On Chinese Literature from the 1950s to the 1970s. Literary Review, No. 02, p. 60-75, 1996.

LIU, Z. J. Construction, Development and Prosperity of Socialist Literature and Art in New China. Research on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theory, Shanghai: Editorial Department of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theory Research. No.11, p. 46-51, 2019.

LIU, Z. J. Reflections on the Ecology of Chinese Literature and Art in the New Era-Based on the Perspective of Main Theme Literature, Research on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theory, Shanghai: Editorial Department of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theory Research. No.10, p. 58-66, 2018.

LIU, Z.S. Review of the History of Chinese Literature Development in the 20th Century. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, p. 28-40+171-172, 2014.

LU, G. S. Dialogue and Reconstruction-An Important Way to Construct Contemporary Marxist Literary Theory. Journal of Renmin University of China 28, p. 125-134, 2014.

LU, X. Awkwardness of Pursuing Aesthetics and New Explanation of Commercial Culture-The Reflections on the Aesthetic Theory of Frankfort School of Thought. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences), 2006(02): p. 50-54.

MAO, Z.D. MAO ZEDONG (Volume 3). Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1991. p. 865-867.

MARX, K.; ENGELS, F. The Complete Works of Marx and Engels (Volume 3), Beijing: People’s Publishing House. 1960.

PENG, S. Y. Interpretation of the Scientific Connotation of Humanistic Care in Marxist Philosophy. Dongyue Luncong, p. 148-152, 2015.

QIN, L. F. The Issue of “Popularization and Improvement” in the Liberated Areas’ Early Literature-Centered on the Discussion of “Small Forms”, “Old Forms” and “National Forms”. Chinese Literary Criticism, p. 21-28, 2020.

REN, J., Ding X. F. Husserl, Heidegger and Marion’s Reflection and Explanation on the Problem of “Cogito”. Journal of Yunnan University (Social Science Edition), p. 40-48,2022.

SCHILLER. Aesthetic Education Booklet. Translated by Xu Hengchun. Beijing: China Federation of Literary and Art Circles Publishing Company, p. 106, 1984.

SCHILLER. Notes on Aesthetic Education. Translated by Zhang Yuneng. Beijing: Yilin Publishing House, p. 113, 2009.

Tan, H. Z. The Three Characteristics of Marxist Theory of Humanities and Culture-Taking Art and Culture as the Center of Theoretical Investigation. Shandong Social Sciences, p. 30-37, 2016.

WANG, A. N., Chen G. H. Mysterious (Geheimnis) Thinking-Heidegger’s Theory of the Origin of Concealment. Hubei Social Sciences, p. 81-86, 2022.

WEN, H. The Constantly Developing and Enriching “People Character of Literature and Art”. Commentaries On Literature and Art, No. 297(01), p. 10-12, 2022.

WU, X, MA, X. Chinese Contemporary Literature Historical Materials Series, Public Literature Historical Materials Volume. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, p. 167, 2016.

XI, J. P. Speech at the Opening Ceremony of the Tenth National Congress of the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles and the Nine Congress of the Chinese Writers Association. People’s Daily, 2016-12-01.

XI, J.P. Speech at the Symposium on Literature and Art. People’s Daily, 2015-10-15(02).

XU, N. Y. Does Marxism Not Emphasize Humanistic Care? Red Flag Manuscripts, p. 25-28, 2012.

ZHANG, Y. N. “Artistic Typical Theory” of Socialist Aesthetics with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era. Literary Controversy, p. 68-73, 2022.

ZHAO, Y. Q. Emphasis on Popularization and Calling for High-quality Goods-Reading Mao Zedong’s “Speech at the Yan’an Forum on Literature and Art” and Xi Jinping’s “Speech at the Forum on Literature and Art Work”. Chinese Literary Criticism, p. 20-26, 2015.

ZHU, L. Y. On the Philosophical Basis of Practical Ontological Aesthetics. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), p. 25-33, 2014.

Received: 10/10/2022

Approved: 19/12/2022

Publicado

15-06-2023

Número

Sección

Artículos y Comentarios

Cómo citar

The Marxist Philosophical Basis of Socialist Literature and Art. (2023). TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO:/Revista/De/Filosofia, 46(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46n3.p255