Non-metaphysical or post-metaphysical thinking? The controversy between Rawls and Habermas on political realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n6.e02400243Keywords:
Political Realism, Normativity, Pluralism, Rawls, HabermasAbstract
This article engages with the discussion between Rawls and Habermas concerning the interplay of political realism and normativity to address a fundamental question in contemporary political philosophy. How realistic is a normative theory of politics that critiques or rejects many deep religious, philosophical, and metaphysical commitments? Rawls contends that political theory achieves realism and objectivity by avoiding pronouncements on metaphysical theories (non-metaphysical). In contrast, Habermas argues that realism emerges when grappling with metaphysical theories and prioritizing praxis over metaphysics (post-metaphysical). The article critically examines Rawls’s objections to metaphysical content, lack of practical interest, and the instability of the foundations of Habermas’s democratic theory. By addressing these objections, it advocates for the greater political realism of the post-metaphysical normative approach.Downloads
References
BAYNES, K. Practical reason, the “space of reasons,” and public reason. In: REGH, W.; BOHMAN, J. (ed.). Pluralism and the pragmatic turn: the transformation of critical theory. Essays in honor of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: MIT, 2001. p. 53-86.
BAYNES, K. Habermas. London/New York: Routledge, 2016.
COOKE, M. Language and reason: a study of Habermas’s pragmatics. Cambridge: MIT, 1997.
DE VITA, A. Por que uma teoria ideal da justiça? E outros ensaios rawlsianos. In: ZANITELLI, L. M.; DUTRA, F. M. (org.). Belo Horizonte: Conhecimento, 2023.
DUTRA, D. J. V. Razão e consenso em Habermas: a teoria discursiva da verdade, da moral, do direito e da biotecnologia. 2. ed. rev. ampl. Florianópolis: UFSC, 2005.
FINLAYSON, J. G. The Habermas-Rawls debate. New York: Columbia University, 2019.
FORST, R. Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit: Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Kommunitarismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.
FORST, R. The right to justification: elements of a constructivist theory of justice. New York: Columbia University, 2012.
HABERMAS, J. Erläuterung zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.
HABERMAS, J. Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung: philosophische Aufsätze. Erweiterte Ausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2004.
HABERMAS, J. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2005.
HABERMAS, J. Zur Verfassung Europas. Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011.
HABERMAS, J. Nachmetaphysisches Denken II: Aufsätze und Repliken. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2012.
HABERMAS, J. A nova obscuridade: pequenos escritos políticos V. Trad. Luiz Repa. São Paulo: Unesp, 2015.
HABERMAS, J. Facticidade e validade: contribuições para uma teoria discursiva do direito e da democracia. Trad. Rúrion Melo e Felipe Gonçalves Silva. São Paulo: Unesp, 2020.
HABERMAS, J. Teoria da ação comunicativa. V. 2. Trad. Luiz Repa. São Paulo: Unesp, 2022.
HABERMAS, J. Consciência moral e ação comunicativa. Trad. Rúrion Melo. São Paulo: Unesp, 2023.
HABERMAS, J. A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política. Trad. Denilson Luís Werle. São Paulo: Unesp, 2018.
HABERMAS, J. Uma nova mudança estrutural da esfera pública e a política deliberativa. Trad. Denilson Luís Werle. São Paulo: Unesp, 2023.
HECK, J. N. Razão prática: uma questão de palavras? A controvérsia Habermas/Kant sobre moral e direito. Kant e-prints, Campinas, s. 2, v. 1, n. 1, p. 19-30, 2006.
JAY, M. Reason after its eclipse: on late critical theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin, 2016.
McCARTHY, T. Ideals and illusions: on reconstruction and deconstruction in contemporary critical theory. Cambridge: MIT, 1991.
McCARTHY, T. Kantian constructivism and reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in dialogue. Ethics, Chicago, v. 105, n. 1, p. 44-63, 1994.
O’NEILL, O. Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. In: FREEMAN, S. (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2003. p. 347-367.
PEDERSEN, J. Justification and application: the revival of the Rawls-Habermas debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Toronto, v. 42, n. 3, p. 399-432, 2012.
RASMUSSEN, D. M. Defending reasonability: the centrality of reasonability in the later Rawls. Philosophy & Social Criticism, Boston, v. 30, n. 5-6, p. 525-540, 2004.
RAWLS, J. A theory of justice. Original edition. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1971.
RAWLS, J. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Erin Kelly (ed.). Cambridge: Belknap, 2001.
RAWLS, J. Political liberalism. Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University, 2005a.
RAWLS, J. Reply to Habermas. In: RAWLS, J. Political liberalism. Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University, 2005b. p. 372-434.
REPA, L. Reconstrução e emancipação: método e política em Jürgen Habermas. São Paulo: Unesp, 2021.
THOMAS, A. Rawls on economic liberty and the choice of systems. In: MANDLE, J.; ROBERTS-CADY, S. (ed.). John Rawls: debating the major questions. New York: Oxford University, 2020. p. 109-121.
WELLMER, A. Ethik und Dialog: Elemente des moralischen Urteils bei Kant und in der Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999.
WERLE, D. L. Justiça e democracia: ensaios sobre John Rawls e Jürgen Habermas. São Paulo: Esfera Pública, 2008.
WERLE, D. L. Construtivismo “não metafísico” e reconstrução “pós-metafísica”: o debate Rawls-Habermas. In: NOBRE, M.; REPA, L. (org.). Habermas e a reconstrução. Campinas: Papirus, 2012. p. 169-196.
Recebido: 26/05/2024 – Aprovado: 05/07/2024 – Publicado: 12/08/2024
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Trans/Form/Ação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons license.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.