Interview with John Danaher on axiological futurism: in pursuit of a better understanding of the relationship between new technologies, risks, and ethics considering value changes

Authors

  • Murilo Vilaça Fiocruz
  • Murilo Karasinski PUC/PR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46n3.p13

Keywords:

Futurismo Axiológico, Valores, John Danaher

Abstract

John Danaher is Senior Lecturer in the School of Law, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. He has an impressive set of publications in internationally prestigious journals (Neuroethics; Law, Innovation and Technology; Science and Engineering Ethics; American Journal of Bioethics; Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics; Bioethics, Futures, among others). Many publications relate specifically to analyses of new technologies and their applications. In the kindly given interview, Danaher, starting with a brief recovery of his trajectory, addressed central points of the concept of axiological futurism, presenting examples of changing values, clarifying his interesting proposal. In addition, he indicated his next steps in the development of the proposal, as well as authors who have influenced it or who have dialogued with it in some way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Murilo Vilaça, Fiocruz

    Ph. D. Researcher at National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil. Research Fellow at FAPERJ (JCNE) and CNPq (APQ – PRÓ-HUMANIDADES). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9720-5552. 

  • Murilo Karasinski, PUC/PR

    Ph. D. Professor at Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR – Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6099-6968.

References

BAILEY, 2004. Transhumanism: The most dangerous idea? Why striving to be more than human is human. Available at: https://reason.com/2004/08/25/transhumanism-the-most-dangero/. Accessed: Aug. 31, 2022.

DANAHER, J. Why internal moral enhancement might be politically better than external moral enhancement. Neuroethics, v. 12, p. 39-54, 2016.

DANAHER, J. Axiological futurism: The systematic study of the future of values. Futures, v. 132, p. 1-14, 2021.

FLORIDI, L. The 4th Revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014.

HOPSTER, J. Future value change: Identifying realistic possibilities and risks. Prometheus, v. 38, n. 1, p. 113-123, 2022.

LIU, H-Y. AI challenges and the inadequacy of human rights protections. Criminal Justice Ethics, v. 40, n. 1, p. 2-22, 2021.

LIU, H-Y.; MAAS, M. M. ‘Solving for X?’ Towards a problem-finding framework to ground long-term governance strategies for artificial intelligence. Futures, v. 126, p. 1-22, 2021.

POEL, I. v. de. Design for value change. Ethics and Information Technology, v. 23, p. 27-31, 2021.

POEL, I. v. de; KUDINA, O. Understanding technology-induced value change: A pragmatist proposal. Philosophy & Technology, v. 35, A.N. 40, 2022.

Recebido: 08/09/2022

Aprovado: 15/02/2023

Downloads

Published

2023-06-15

Issue

Vol. 46 No. 3 (2023): July-September/2023

Section

Interview

License

Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons license.

How to Cite

VILAÇA, Murilo; KARASINSKI, Murilo. Interview with John Danaher on axiological futurism: in pursuit of a better understanding of the relationship between new technologies, risks, and ethics considering value changes. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, SP, v. 46, n. 3, p. 13–30, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46n3.p13. Disponível em: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13704.. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.