Habits and rationality: An interdisciplinary philosophical study on autonomy in the Big Data era

Authors

  • Maria Eunice Gonzalez UNESP
  • Mariana Claudia UNESP
  • José Artur Quilici-Gonzalez UFABC
  • Guiou Kobayashi UFABC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp1.p367

Keywords:

Autonomy, Big Data, Emotions, Habits, Information and communication technologies, Qualitative complex systems

Abstract

The following dilemma is discussed: On the one hand, the growing impact of Technology of communication and information (ICT) in everyday habits seems to influence the dynamics of public opinion by reinforcing irrational beliefs and creating the impression that the autonomy of people’s opinion and decisions is just a myth. On the other hand, people seem to act most of the time, under the normal circumstances of daily life, in a rational way, as if their habitual actions result from relatively autonomous decisions. A way out of this dilemma is suggested with the hypothesis that people can be rational most of the time, but nevertheless have their opinions influenced by insufficient, distorted information, or by previously acquired emotional dispositions. This hypothesis, in turn, is going to be scrutinized by considering, from a philosophical-interdisciplinary perspective, the role of rational choices in the dynamics of autonomous opinion. With illustrations of diagrams, we claim that the qualitative Complex Systems paradigm might help us to understand the possible role of emotional dispositions in the dynamics of autonomous opinion formation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

References

ALTARES, G. Agnes Heller: “A maldade mata, mas a razão leva a coisas mais terríveis”. 2017. Disponível em: https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2017/09/02/eps/1504379180_260851.html. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2022.

ANSCOMBE, E. Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, v. 33, n. 124, p. 1, 1958. Disponível em: https://www.pitt.edu/~mthompso/readings/mmp.pdf. Acesso em: 27 maio 2022.

BAIN, A. The Emotions and the Will. Miami: HardPress, 2017.

BATESON, G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.

BATESON, G.; JACKSON, D.; HALEY, J.; WEAKLAND, J. Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, v. 1, n. 4, p. 251-254, 1956.

BENTHAM, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener - CA: Batoche Books, 2000. Disponível em: https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/bentham/morals.pdf. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2022.

BOYD, D.; CRAWFORD, K. Critical Questions for Big Data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, v. 15, n. 5, p. 662-679, Jun. 2012.

CHOI, S.; FARA, M. Dispositions. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/dispositions. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2022.

DREYFUS, H. What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. Revised edition. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

FURNER, J. Data: The data. In: KELLY, M.; BIELBY, J. (ed.). Information Cultures in the Digital Age. A Festschrift in Honour of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2016.

GONZALEZ, M. E. Q. Autonomous action in complex mechanical systems: A real dilemma? In: ADAMS, F.; PESSOA JUNIOR, O.; KOGLER JUNIOR., J. E. (ed.). Cognitive Science: Recent Advances and Recurring Problems. Wilmington (DE), v. 1, p. 17-30, 2017.

HANDFIELD, T. The Metaphysics of Dispositions and Causes. In: HANDFIELD, T. (ed.). Dispositions and Causes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-31, 2009. Disponível em: http://home.iprimus.com.au/than/toby/met-disp-caus.pdf. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2022.

LALANDA-GONÇALVES, R. (org.) A sistêmica qualitativa: uma reflexão nos Açores. Tradução de Laura Lourenço. Ponta Delgada: CES/UA, Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade dos Açores, 2010.

LANEY, D. 3D Data Management Controlling Data Volume Velocity and Variety. 2001. Disponível em: https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf. Acesso em: 05 set. 2018.

MAYER-SCHONBERGER, V.; CUKIER, K. Big Data. A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.

PAYNE, A. Brexit poll finds record majority of British people think leaving the EU was a mistake. Insider, 17 nov. 2020. Disponível em: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/9pwtr2uj3h/TheTimes_VITrackerResults_201112.pdf. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2022.

RYLE, G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.

SAPIRE, D. Disposition. In: AUDI, D. (ed.). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

SEARLE, J. R. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 3, n. 3, p. 417-457, 1980. Disponível em: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.searle2.html. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2022.

SHANNON, C. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, v. 27, p. 379-423, 623-656, Jul./Oct. 1948. Disponível em: https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf. Acesso em: 18 mar. 2022.

SCHWITZGEBEL, E. Belief. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 edition). Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/belief/. Acesso em: 10 set. 2022.

SIDGWICK, H. The Methods of Ethics. 7. ed. London: Macmillan, 1907. Disponível em: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/46743/46743-h/46743-h.htm. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2022.

WEBER, M. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978.

WIENER, N. Cybernetics: or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1948.

Agradecimentos: Agradecemos as contribuições de Ettore Bresciani Filho e Juliana Moroni e as parcerias do GAEC – Grupo Acadêmico de Estudos Cognitivos da UNESP e do Grupo Auto-Organização do CLE – Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência da UNICAMP. Também agradecemos o apoio da UNESP e do CNPq.

Recebido: 27/08/2023

Aceito: 16/01/2023

Published

2023-07-08

How to Cite

GONZALEZ, Maria Eunice; MARIANA CLAUDIA; QUILICI-GONZALEZ, José Artur; KOBAYASHI, Guiou. Habits and rationality: An interdisciplinary philosophical study on autonomy in the Big Data era. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, SP, v. 46, p. 367–386, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp1.p367. Disponível em: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/13674.. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.