Crisis of care and crisis of democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46n1.p37Keywords:
Care, Democracy, Crisis, Critical theoryAbstract
The article discusses the political significance of the care crisis in its relation to the crisis of democracy. Firstly, based on the ethics of care and critical theory, care is characterized as a type of social and political practice. Then, it is examined the ethical and political problems which derive from a social organization of care according to market principles. Finally, the article addresses the question for a democratic solution to the current care crisis.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, J.; HONNETH, A. Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice. En: CHRISTMAN, J.; ANDERSON, J. (ed.). Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 127-149.
BERLIN, I. Two Concepts of Liberty. En: BERLIN, I. Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 166-217.
BROWN, W. In the ruins of neoliberalism. The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.
COLLINS, S. The core of care ethics. Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
CHATZIDAKIS, A.; HAKIM, J.; LITTLER, J.; ROTTENBERG, C.; SEGAL, L. (The Care Collective). The care manifesto. The politics of interdependence. Londres: Verso, 2020.
DARAT, N. Autonomía y vulnerabilidad. La ética del cuidado como perspectiva crítica. Isegoría 64: e03, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2021.64.03
DOWLING, E. The care crisis. What caused It and how can we end it? Londres: Verso, 2021.
ENGSTER, D. The heart of justice. Care ethics and political theory. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2007.
ENGSTER, D. Justice, care, and the welfare state. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2015.
ESQUIVEL, V. El cuidado: de concepto analítico a agenda política. Nueva Sociedad 256: 63-74, 2015.
FOLBRE, N. y BITTMAN, M. Family time. The social organization of care. Londres: Routledge, 2004.
FRASER, N. 2016. Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review 100, 99-117, 2016.
GHEAUS, A. How much of what matters can we redistribute? Love, justice, and luck. Hypatia 24, 4, 63-83, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01058.x
GILLIGAN, C. In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
GROENHOUT, R.E. Connected lives. Human nature and an ethics of care. Reino Unido: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
HABERMAS, J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. II., Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1981.
HELD, V. Feminist morality. Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
HELD, V. The ethics of care. Personal, political, and global. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press. 2006.
HOCHSCHILD, A.R. The second shift. Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin Books, 2012.
HONNETH, A. Demokratie als reflexive Kooperation. John Dewey und die Demokratietheorie der Gegenwart. En: HONNETH, A. Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2000, p. 282-309.
HONNETH, A. Umverteilung als Anerkennung. Eine Erwiderung auf Nancy Fraser. En: Fraser, N.; HONNETH, A. Umverteilung oder Anerkennung? Eine politisch-philosophische Kontroverse. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003, p. 129 - 224.
HONNETH, A. Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011
HONNETH, A. Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2012.
HONNETH, A. Anerkennung. Eine europäische Ideengeschichte. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2018.
HONNETH, A. Drei, nicht zwei Begriffe der Freiheit. Zur Reaktualisierung einer verschütteten Tradition. En: HONNETH, A. Die Armut unserer Freiheit. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2020, p. 139-163.
JAEGGI, R. Was (wenn überhaupt etwas) ist falsch am Kapitalismus? Drei Wege der Kapitalismuskritik. En: JAEGGI, R.; LOICK, D. (ed.). Nach Marx. Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2013, p. 321-349.
MACKENZIE, C.; ROGERS, W.; DODDS, S. Vulnerability. New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
GLENN, E.N. Forced to care. Coercion and caregiving in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.
MENA, P. Vulnerabilidad y cuidado. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista De Filosofia, 44(2), 277–300, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44n2.20.p277
NODDINGS, N. Starting at home. Caring and social policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
NODDINGS, N. Caring. A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.
PETHERBRIDGE, D. Recognition, Vulnerability and Trust. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29, 1, 1-23, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2021.1885135
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
SANDEL, M. What Money Can’t Buy. The Moral Limits of Markets. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2012.
SATZ, D. Why Some Things Should not Be for Sale. The Moral Limits of Markets. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SLOTE, M. Care ethics and liberalism. En: ENGSTER, D.; HAMINGTON, M. (eds.). Care ethics and political theory. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press. 2015, p. 37-50.
TRONTO, J.C. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge, 1993.
TRONTO, J.C. Caring democracy. Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
TRONTO, J.C. There is an alternative: homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring 1, 1: 27-43, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1332/239788217X14866281687583
YOUNG, I. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
ZURN, Ch. Axel Honneth. Reino Unido: Polity Press, 2015.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons license.