Crisis de los cuidados y crisis de la democracia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46n1.p37Palavras-chave:
Cuidados, Democracia, Crisis, Teoría críticaResumo
Este artículo discute el significado político de la crisis de los cuidados en su relación con la crisis de la democracia. Desde las éticas del cuidado y la teoría crítica se caracteriza, en primer lugar, a los cuidados como un tipo específico de práctica social y política. En segundo lugar, se examinan los problemas éticos y políticos derivados de una organización social de los cuidados según principios de mercado. Se concluye abordando la pregunta por una solución democrática a la actual crisis de los cuidados.
Downloads
Referências
ANDERSON, J.; HONNETH, A. Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice. En: CHRISTMAN, J.; ANDERSON, J. (ed.). Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 127-149.
BERLIN, I. Two Concepts of Liberty. En: BERLIN, I. Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 166-217.
BROWN, W. In the ruins of neoliberalism. The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.
COLLINS, S. The core of care ethics. Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
CHATZIDAKIS, A.; HAKIM, J.; LITTLER, J.; ROTTENBERG, C.; SEGAL, L. (The Care Collective). The care manifesto. The politics of interdependence. Londres: Verso, 2020.
DARAT, N. Autonomía y vulnerabilidad. La ética del cuidado como perspectiva crítica. Isegoría 64: e03, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2021.64.03
DOWLING, E. The care crisis. What caused It and how can we end it? Londres: Verso, 2021.
ENGSTER, D. The heart of justice. Care ethics and political theory. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2007.
ENGSTER, D. Justice, care, and the welfare state. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2015.
ESQUIVEL, V. El cuidado: de concepto analítico a agenda política. Nueva Sociedad 256: 63-74, 2015.
FOLBRE, N. y BITTMAN, M. Family time. The social organization of care. Londres: Routledge, 2004.
FRASER, N. 2016. Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review 100, 99-117, 2016.
GHEAUS, A. How much of what matters can we redistribute? Love, justice, and luck. Hypatia 24, 4, 63-83, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01058.x
GILLIGAN, C. In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
GROENHOUT, R.E. Connected lives. Human nature and an ethics of care. Reino Unido: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
HABERMAS, J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. II., Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1981.
HELD, V. Feminist morality. Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
HELD, V. The ethics of care. Personal, political, and global. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press. 2006.
HOCHSCHILD, A.R. The second shift. Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin Books, 2012.
HONNETH, A. Demokratie als reflexive Kooperation. John Dewey und die Demokratietheorie der Gegenwart. En: HONNETH, A. Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2000, p. 282-309.
HONNETH, A. Umverteilung als Anerkennung. Eine Erwiderung auf Nancy Fraser. En: Fraser, N.; HONNETH, A. Umverteilung oder Anerkennung? Eine politisch-philosophische Kontroverse. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2003, p. 129 - 224.
HONNETH, A. Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011
HONNETH, A. Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2012.
HONNETH, A. Anerkennung. Eine europäische Ideengeschichte. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2018.
HONNETH, A. Drei, nicht zwei Begriffe der Freiheit. Zur Reaktualisierung einer verschütteten Tradition. En: HONNETH, A. Die Armut unserer Freiheit. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2020, p. 139-163.
JAEGGI, R. Was (wenn überhaupt etwas) ist falsch am Kapitalismus? Drei Wege der Kapitalismuskritik. En: JAEGGI, R.; LOICK, D. (ed.). Nach Marx. Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2013, p. 321-349.
MACKENZIE, C.; ROGERS, W.; DODDS, S. Vulnerability. New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
GLENN, E.N. Forced to care. Coercion and caregiving in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.
MENA, P. Vulnerabilidad y cuidado. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista De Filosofia, 44(2), 277–300, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44n2.20.p277
NODDINGS, N. Starting at home. Caring and social policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
NODDINGS, N. Caring. A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.
PETHERBRIDGE, D. Recognition, Vulnerability and Trust. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29, 1, 1-23, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2021.1885135
RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
SANDEL, M. What Money Can’t Buy. The Moral Limits of Markets. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2012.
SATZ, D. Why Some Things Should not Be for Sale. The Moral Limits of Markets. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SLOTE, M. Care ethics and liberalism. En: ENGSTER, D.; HAMINGTON, M. (eds.). Care ethics and political theory. Reino Unido: Oxford University Press. 2015, p. 37-50.
TRONTO, J.C. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge, 1993.
TRONTO, J.C. Caring democracy. Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
TRONTO, J.C. There is an alternative: homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring 1, 1: 27-43, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1332/239788217X14866281687583
YOUNG, I. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
ZURN, Ch. Axel Honneth. Reino Unido: Polity Press, 2015.
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.