Main features of Sloterdijk’s work on technology

Authors

  • Bernhard Syll Universidade do Minho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44dossier.08.p141

Keywords:

Philosophy of Technology, Sloterdijk, Homeotechnology, Traumatology, Spherology

Abstract

In this article, I will focus on the main features of Sloterdijk’s work on the phenomenon and the role of technology. Regarding this context, I will distinguish between a first and a second Sloterdijk, the first sustaining a still quite technophobic position, evident, for instance, in his 1989
work, Eurotaoismus: Zur Kritik der politischen Kinetik, while the second develops a more careful and diversified theory that distinguishes between two forms of technology, allotechnology and homeotechnology. Further, I will relate these forms of technology to Sloterdijk’s spherology, developed since 1998, which provides the anthropological and, as Sloterdijk states, also metaphysical and phenomenological foundations of the phenomenon of technology. Finally, I will discuss two issues that build a kind of counterpoint to the “optimistic” notion of homeotechnology, namely (i) the traumatological aspect of the technological search for immunity and (ii) the role of language in the construction of the immune spheres.

References

BOLK, L. Das Problem der Menschwerdung. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1926.

DUQUE, F. En torno al humanismo. Madrid: Tecnos, 2002.

FEENBERG, A. Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History. London/NewYork: Routledge, 2005.

FLUSSER, V. Krise der Linearität. Bern: Benteli, 1992.

HEIDEGGER, M. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Hrsg. v. F.-W. von Herrmann. Frankfurt/M.: Klostermann, 2000 [= GA 7].

IHDE, D. Heidegger’s technologies: postphenomenological perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.

JONGEN, M. On Anthropospheres and Aphrogrammes. Peter Sloterdijk’s Thought Images of the Monstrous. Humana Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies, v. 18, p. 199-219, 2011.

KOLLMANN, J. Das Überwintern europäischer Frosch- und Tritonlarven und die Umwandlung der mexikanischen Axolotl. Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Basel, n. 7, 1885.

MITCHAM, C. Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.

REGELN für den Menschenpark, 2019. Disponível em: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regeln_f%C3%BCr_den_Menschenpark#Literatur. Acesso em: 01 jun. 2020.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Zur Welt kommen – Zur Sprache kommen: Frankfurter Vorlesungen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1988.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Eurotaoismus: Zur Kritik der politischen Kinetik. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1989.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Sphären I: Blasen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1998.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Regeln für den Menschenpark: Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über den Humanismus. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1999a.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Sphären II: Globen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1999b.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Nicht gerettet: Versuche nach Heidegger. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2001.

SLOTERDIJK, P. A mobilização infinita: para uma crítica da cinética política. Trad. P. Osório de Castro. Lisboa: Relógio d’Água, 2002.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Sphären III: Schäume. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2004.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Du mußt dein Leben ändern: Über Anthropotechnik. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2012.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Der ästhetische Imperativ: Schriften zur Kunst. Hrsg. und mit einem Nachwort versehen v. P. Weibel. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014.

SLOTERDIJK, P. Das Anthropozän – Ein Prozeß-Zustand am Rande der Erd-Geschichte? In: SLOTERDIJK, P. Was geschah im 20. Jahrhundert? Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2016. p. 7-43.

SLOTERDIJK, P. O Antropoceno – Estado de um processo à margem da história da Terra? In: RIBEIRO MENDES, J.; SYLLA, B. (orgs.). Tecnofilosofia líquida: Anders, Blumenberg e Sloterdijk. Braga: Centro de Ética, Política e Sociedade, 2019. p. 83-100.

SLOTERDIJK Debatte, 2010. Disponível em: http://web.archive.org/web/20100212115124/http:/www.univie.ac.at/ethik/online_texte/6.2.1.bioethik/sloterdijk_debatte.htm . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2020.

Recebido: 08/01/2021 - Aceito: 14/3/2021

Published

2021-05-17 — Updated on 2022-07-01

How to Cite

Main features of Sloterdijk’s work on technology. (2022). Trans/Form/Ação, 44(Special issue 1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44dossier.08.p141