Como devemos pensar sobre a prosperidade comum e seus desafios no contexto da capitalização?

Autores

  • Zhanmin Cui Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
  • Zhihua Liao Institute of Economic Ethics, School of Humanities, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
  • Yuxiao Luo Central Philippine University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp.p291

Palavras-chave:

Prosperidade comum, Fetichismo financeiro, Valor narrativo, Desafio financeiro

Resumo

A China promove ativamente a prosperidade comum e resolve a contradição do desequilíbrio do desenvolvimento. A capitalização tornou-se o pano de fundo da prosperidade comum. Como entender as mudanças na conotação da prosperidade comum e seus fatores de influência, no contexto da capitalização, tornou-se o tema deste artigo. Acredita-se que o desequilíbrio entre ativos e renda do trabalho e a nova forma de geração de valor são as razões pelas quais a prosperidade comum é difícil de alcançar. A fim de provar a racionalidade dessa conclusão, este artigo examina a questão da capitalização a partir da perspectiva crítica da economia política marxista e toma o caso de capitalização da China como um exemplo para explorar os desafios práticos e os desafios ideológicos enfrentados pela prosperidade comum. Este texto analisa uma nova forma de fetichismo - a essência do fetichismo financeiro introduz o conceito de valor narrativo e revela a distorção e a erosão do valor do fetichismo financeiro sobre os valores das pessoas e o mistério do valor narrativo.

Biografia do Autor

  • Zhanmin Cui, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

    School of Humanities, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433 - China.
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-9702.

  • Zhihua Liao, Institute of Economic Ethics, School of Humanities, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

    School of Humanities, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433 - China.
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-4668.

  • Yuxiao Luo, Central Philippine University

    Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies, Central Philippine University, Iloilo City 5000 -
    Philippines. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-6184.

Referências

BJERG, O. Making Money: The Philosophy of Crisis Capitalism. London: Verso Books, 2014.

CHEN, J. M.; LIU, H. X. A Comparison of Mao Zedong's and Deng Xiaoping's Ideas of Common Prosperity. Socialism Studies, v. 165, n. 1, p. 42-44, 2006.

CHEN, X.; GUO, Y. The Impact of Financialization Development on the Real Economy in China. Study & Exploration, v. 12, n. 257, p. 94-176, 2016.

CHEN, Z. W. The Logic of Finance I: How Finance Can Enrich the People and Strengthen the Nation. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian, 2018.

CHENG, E. F.; LIU, W. A. Theoretical and Empirical Interpretation of the Idea of Common Prosperity in Socialism. Studies on Marxism, v. 144, n. 6, p. 41-159, 2012.

CHENG, X. L. Overview of Narrative Theory. Foreign Languages Research, v. 73, n. 3, p. 10-15, 2002.

DENG, Q. H.; SUN J. F. Narrowing the Property Gap to Achieve Common Prosperity Gradually. Financial Economics Research, v. 36, n. 5, p. 138-140, 2017.

DONG, Z. H. Exploration of Marxist Worldview Methodology of Shared Development Concept. Philosophical Research, n. 6, p. 13-18, 2016.

DOUGLAS, A. X. The Philosophy of Debt. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

FU, C. W.; GAO, W. The Basic Connotation and Index System of Common Prosperity in Spiritual Life. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), v. 252, n. 3, p. 11-24, 2022.

GOETZMANN, W. N. Money Changes Everything: How Finance Made Civilization Possible. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2017.

GREEN, S. D.; SERGEEVA, N. Value Creation in Projects: Towards A Narrative Perspective. International Journal of Project Management, v. 37, n. 5, p. 636-651, 2019.

HAIVEN, M. Cultures of Financialization: Fictitious Capital in Popular Culture and Everyday Life, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

HILFERDING, R. Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London, Boston, and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.

KAKWANI, N. et al. Growth and Common Prosperity in China. China & World Economy, v. 30, n. 1, p. 28-57, 2022.

KOTZ, D. M. Neoliberalism and the SSA Theory of Long-Run Capital Accumulation. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 35, n. 3, p. 264-270, 2003.

KRIPPNER, G. R. The Financialization of the American Economy. Socio-Economic Review, v. 3, n. 2, p. 174-208, 2015.

LENIN, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. 1939. New York: International, 1993.

LI, L. B. Neoliberalism, the Reconstruction of Subjectivity and the Financialization of Every Life. Marxism & Reality, v. 160, n. 3, p. 149-155, 2019.

LIN, K. H.; DEVEY, D. T. Financialization and U.S. Income Inequality, 1970-2008. American Journal of Sociology, v. 118, n. 5, p. 1284-1329, 2013.

MARX, K. Marx & Engels Collected Works. V. 36. In: JACK, C. et al. (ed.). Karl Marx: Capital – v. II (Electric Book). London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2010a.

MARX, K. Marx & Engels Collected Works. V. 37. In: JACK, C. et al. (ed.). Karl Marx: Capital – v. III (Electric Book). London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2010b.

MARX, K. Marx & Engels Collected Works (1845-1847). V. 5. In: JACK, C. et al. (ed.). Karl Marx: Capital – v. II (Electric Book). London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2010c. p. 356-437.

MOHD, D. et al. Financialization, Digital Technology and Income Inequality. Applied Economics Letters, v. 28, n. 16, p. 1339-1343, 2021.

MURRAY, J. A. H. et al. The Oxford English Dictionary, V. X, 2. ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.

RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.

ROLNIK, R. Late Neoliberalism: The Financialization of Homeownership and Housing Rights. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, v. 37, n. 3, p. 1058-1066, 2013.

SHILLER, R. J. Finance and the Good Society. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2012.

SIMMEL, G. The Philosophy of Money. Translated by Tom Bottomore and David Frisby, London & New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library (Electric Book), 2011.

STOCKHAMMER, E. Financialization, Income Distribution and the Crisis. Investigación Económica, v. 71, n. 279, p. 39-70, 2022.

SU, C. Analyses of the Effect of Fiscal and Financial Funds in Precise Poverty Alleviation. Jianghan Academic, v. 36, n. 4, p. 69-73, 2017.

TANG, K.; XIONG, W. Index Investment and the Financialization of Commodities. Financial Analysts Journal, v. 68, n. 6, p. 54-74, 2012.

TOPOROWSKI, J. Marx, Finance and Political Economy. Review of Political Economy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 2-12, 2018.

VASUDEVAN, R. Financialization, Distribution and Accumulation: A Circuit of Capital Model with a Managerial Class. Metroeconomica, v. 67, n. 2, p. 397-428, 2016.

WANG, Q. F. Critique of Financial Capital——Contemporary Effects of Marx's Theory of Capital and its Logical Rationale. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, v. 53, n. 5, p. 85-91, 2013.

XIANG, J. Y.; MA, Y. J. The Connotation, Hierarchy and Realization of the Common Prosperity of People's Spiritual Life. Ideological & Theoretical Education, v. 518, n. 6, p. 11-16, 2022.

YI, H. Building Narrative Identity: Episodic Value and its Identity-Forming Structure within Personal and Social Contexts. Human Affairs, v. 30, n. 2, p. 281-292, 2020.

YIN, Y. P. Inclusive Finance to Help Fight Poverty. Frontline, v. 3, n. 3, p. 34-37, 2019.

ZHANG, M.; LIU, Y. Three Aspects of Finance to Help to Achieve Common Prosperity. China Finance, v. 959, n. 17, p. 32-34, 2021.

ZHANG, R. H. Green Inclusive Finance for Common Prosperity. China Finance, v. 963, n. 21, p. 33-35, 2021.

ZHAO, F.; TIAN J. H. The Financialization of Contemporary Chinese Economy: A Structural and Comparative Approach. China Review of Political Economy, v. 6, n. 3, p.120-142, 2015.

ZOU, K.; NI, Q. S. Inclusive Finance Promotes Mutual Prosperity: Theory, Measurement, and Empirical Research. Financial Economics Research, v. 36, n. 5, p. 48-62, 2021.

Received: 27/7/2022

Approved: 27/9/2022

Publicado

07-03-2023

Edição

Seção

Artigos e Comentários

Como Citar

Como devemos pensar sobre a prosperidade comum e seus desafios no contexto da capitalização?. (2023). Trans/Form/Ação, 46(Edição Especial), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp.p291