DIALOGUES BETWEEN SOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
domain analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02154Keywords:
Sociology of Knowledge, Sociology of Science, Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, Domain AnalysisAbstract
This study aims to present aspects of approximation between sociological studies on knowledge, science and scientific knowledge and Information Science, found in the periodic scientific production of a universe of 98 Productivity Fellows in Brazil. We aimed to identify the referent authors from the sociological fields that focus on knowledge, science, and scientific knowledge featured in this production; to highlight similarities or differences between the researchers and the referent authors; and to diachronically analyze the presence and coupling of the authors from these three sociological fields in the periodical production of the PQ fellows. As methodological procedures, we situated the PQs within the fields, starting with a priori classification, and identified the presence of these authors by performing searches in Brapci, based on their scientific productions, pointing out the coupling relations between citing authors and the most cited referents. Results show Castells, Bourdieu, Cronin, Popper, and Merton as the most cited sociologists, and we also produced an adjacency matrix to verify the most cited sociologists in each of the fields. We built the network of referents to expose the coupling relations between them and the PQs. We conclude this article by highlighting the presence of the authors cited in the PQs’ productions in all categories, and the identification of the dynamics of scientific production within its movements, based on the analytical procedures.
Downloads
References
Araújo, Carlos Alberto Ávila. Arquivologia, Biblioteconomia, Museologia e Ciência da Informação. O Diálogo Possível. Briquet de Lemos, 2014.
Bourdieu, Pierre. “O campo científico.” Pierre Bourdieu: Sociologia, de Renato Ortiz, Ática, 1983, pp. 123-155.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Razões práticas: sobre a teoria da ação. 11. ed., Papirus, 1996.
Bufrem, Leilah Santiago. Linhas e tendências metodológicas na produção acadêmica discente do mestrado em Ciência da Informação do IBICT-UFRJ, 1996. Universidade Federal do Paraná - Tese de Doutorado.
Capurro, Rafael. “Epistemologia e Ciência da Informação.” V Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação, 10 - 14 de novembro de 2003, Belo Horizonte, Enancib, 2003.
Castells, Manuel. A sociedade em rede: a era da informação -economia, sociedade e cultura. Paz e Terra, 1998.
Collins, Harry and Robert Evans. "The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience.” Social Studies of Science, vol. 32, nº 2, 2002, pp. 235-296.
Collins, Harry. “Introdução.” Investigações contemporâneas em estudos sociais da ciência e tecnologia, de Adriano Premebida, et al., Paco Editorial, 2015.
Collins, Harry. “The sociology of scientific knowledge: Studies of Contemporary Science.” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 9, Aug. 1983, pp. 265-285.
Cronin, Blaise “The sociological turn in information science.” Journal of Information Science, vol. 34, nº 4, 2008, pp. 465-475.
Damus, Maria Arminda y Gabriela Noemí Acuña. “Aproximación al Análisis de Dominio (AD) desde la investigación en Bibliotecología y Ciencia de la Información.” e-Ciencias de la Información, vol. 9, nº 2, 2019.
Egghe, Leo and Ronald Rousseau. “Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks.” Scientometrics, vol. 55, nº 3, 2002, pp. 349-361.
Elias, Norbert. “Sociologia do conhecimento: novas perspectivas.” Sociedade e Estado, vol. 23, nº 3, 2008, pp. 515-554.
Fetz, Marcelo, et al. “Olhares sociológicos sobre a ciência no século vinte: mudanças e continuidades.” Sociologias, vol. 13, nº 17, 2011, pp 284-317.
Garfield, Eugene. From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography: a citationist’s tribute to Belver C. Griffith. Drexel University, 2001.
Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche I. Forense Universitária, 2007.
Hjørland, Birger and Hanne Albrechtsen. "Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, nº 6, 1995, pp. 400-425.
Hjørland, Birger. "Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches - traditional as well asinnovative.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 58, nº 4, 2002, pp. 422-462.
Iranzo Amatriaín, Juan Manuel y José Rubén Blanco Merlo. Sociología del conocimiento científico, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 1999.
Kessler, Myer. “Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers.” American Documentation, vol. 14, nº 1, pp.10-25, 1963.
Lloyd, Christopher. As estruturas da história. Jorge Zahar, 1995.
Macias-Chapula, César. “O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional.” Ciência da Informação, vol. 27, nº 2, 1998, pp. 134-140.
Magee, Bryan. As ideias de Popper. 3. ed., Cultrix, 1979.
Mai, Je. “Analysis in indexing: document and domain centered approaches.” Information Processing and Management, vol. 41, 2005, pp. 599-611.
Mannheim, Karl. Ideologia e utopia. Zahar, 1976.
Marshakova, Irina. “Citation networks in information science.” Scientometrics, nº 3, 1981, pp. 13-25.
Marx, Karl. Para a crítica da economia política. Salário, preço e lucro. O rendimento e suas fontes. Abril Cultural, 1982.
Mattedi, Marcos Antônio. Sociedade e Conhecimento: introdução à abordagem sociológica do problema do conhecimento. Argos, 2006.
Merton, Robert King. “Paradigma para la sociología del conocimiento.” Sociología de la Ciencia, de Robert Merton, Alianza, 1985, pp. 46-86.
Merton, Robert King. Science, Technology and Society in Seven-theenth-Century England. Harper and Row, 1970.
Oliveira, Ely Tannuri. Estudos Métricos da Informação no Brasil: indicadores de produção, colaboração, impacto e visibilidade. Oficina Universitária, Cultura Acadêmica, 2018.
Paulo Netto, José. “Notas para a discussão e sistematização da prática e teoria em serviço social.” Cadernos Abess, nº 3, 1989.
Popper, Karl. A lógica da pesquisa científica. 2. ed., Cultrix, 1975.
Schwartzman, Simon. “A ciência da ciência.” Ciência Hoje, vol. 2, nº 11, 1984, pp. 54-59.
Souza, Francisco das Chagas. O ensino da Biblioteconomia no contexto brasileiro. Ed. UFSC, 1990.
Vessuri, Hebe. “Sociologia de la ciencia: enfoques y orientaciones.” Ciencia, tecnología y desarrollo: inter-relaciones teóricas y metodológicas, de Eduardo Martinez, Nueva Sociedad, 1994, pp. 51-89.
Weber, Max. Conceitos básicos de Sociologia. 5. ed., Centauro, 2008.
Zhao, Dangzhi and Andreas Strotmann. “Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 59, nº 13, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Leilah Santiago Bufrem, Rene Faustino Gabriel Junior, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
