Activity Theory in understanding Information Literacy as a Social Innovation

Authors

  • Alessandra Santos Universidade FUMEC
  • Prof. Dr. Luiz Maia FUMEC University
  • Prof.ª Dr.ª Marta FUMEC University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2021.v15.e02129

Keywords:

Information Literacy, Social Innovation, Activity Theory, Expansive Learning

Abstract

Information literacy has gained relevance for being a fundamental pillar for lifelong learning, since it develops an understanding of the form, processes and cycle of production and critical use of different types of information. Information literacy is a meta-competence capable of helping the individual to deal with specific informational needs of each context and, because information literacy is considered essential for full human development, it can be considered as social innovation, since social innovation aims at social transformation by means of changes in social practices. This article is a literature review that attempted to elucidate how Engeström's Activity Theory is a potential theory to represent the underlying process of learning transfer that occurs in the processes of transformational information literacy in a context of social innovation, contrasting it with the situational perspective of information competence, in which learning is not automatically transferable from one context to another, but mediated by practice and limited to the situation, innovation can be stymied by the unidirectional learning movement that makes the learner experienced of a practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Alessandra Santos, Universidade FUMEC

    Doctoral student in Information Systems and Knowledge Management at FUMEC University. Master in Management, Education and Local Development from Centro Universitário Una. Specialist in Corporate Education and Knowledge Management from Estácio de Sá University. Specialist in Teaching and Management of Higher Education from Estácio de Sá University. Specialist in People Management from Centro Universitário Una. Bachelor of Biological Sciences from the Federal University of Minas Gerais.

  • Prof. Dr. Luiz Maia, FUMEC University

    Doctor and Master in Information Science from the Federal University of Minas Gerais, graduated in Computer Science from the FUMEC University, a degree in Pedagogy from the State University of Minas Gerais and a degree in Letters from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Professor at FUMEC University in the graduation in Information Technology and in the Post-Graduate Program in Information Systems and Knowledge Management. Researcher at LAIS - Laboratory for Advanced Information Systems.

  • Prof.ª Dr.ª Marta, FUMEC University

    Post-doctorate in Information and Communication Science at the University Paul Sabatier/IUT/Toulouse III. PhD in Information Science - IBICT/CNPq-ECO-UFRJ with a PhD in Sandwich Sociologie at the Center dÉtudes des Mouvements Sociaux. Master's Degree in Information Science from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Professor at FUMEC University in the Postgraduate Program in Information Systems and Knowledge Management.

References

Abdallah, Nabil Ben. “Activity Theory as a framework for understanding Information Literacy”. Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice. ECIL 2013. Editado por S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts e S. Špiranec, Sonja. Springer, 2013, pp. 93-99.

Aguiar Filho, Armando Sérgio de. O papel dos grupos de apoio no compartilhamento da informação e do conhecimento nas avaliações das instituições de ensino superior privadas, 2016, http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-ARKKDC. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Tese de Doutorado. Acessado 4 dez. 2019.

Albagli, Sarita. “Conhecimento, inclusão social e desenvolvimento local”. Inclusão Social, vol. 1, no. 2, 2006, pp. 17-22, http://revista.ibict.br/inclusao/article/view/1514. Acessado 09 jun. 2021.

André, Isabel, e Abreu, Alexandre. “Dimensões e espaços da inovação social”. Finisterra, vol. 81, 2006, pp. 121-141, https://revistas.rcaap.pt/finisterra/article/view/1465. Acessado 10 nov. 2020.

Behrens, Shirley. “A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy”. College and Research Libraries, vol. 55, no. 4, 1994, pp. 309-322, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_55_04_309. Acessado 22 nov. 2020.

Belluzzo, Regina Célia Baptista. “Competência em informação (CoInfo) e midiática: inter-relação com a Agenda 2030 e os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS) sob a ótica da educação contemporânea”. Folha de Rosto, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018, pp. 15-24, https://periodicos.ufca.edu.br/ojs/index.php/folhaderosto/article/view/289. Acessado 10 jun. 2021.

Belluzzo, Regina Célia Baptista. “O estado da arte da competência em informação (CoInfo) no Brasil: das reflexões iniciais à apresentação e descrição de indicadores de análise”. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, vol. 13, no. especial, 2017, pp. 47-76, https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/648/570. Acessado 10 jun. 2021.

Berrío-Zapata, Cristian. “Entre la alfabetización informacional y la brecha digital: Reflexiones para una reconceptualización de los fenómenos de exclusión digital”. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, vol. 35, no. 1, 2012, pp. 39-53, http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-09762012000100004&lng=pt&nrm=.pf&tlng=es. Acessado 16 mai. 2021.

Bertin, Patrícia Rocha Bello, et al. “A informação em ciência e tecnologia como insumo para a inovação social: elementos para discussão”. Anais do 23º Congresso Brasileiro de Biblioteconomia, Documentação e Ciência da Informação: Bonito, FEBAB, 2009, pp. 1-11. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/12143. Acessado 10 jun. 2021.

Bignetti, Luiz Paulo. “As inovações sociais: uma incursão por ideias, tendências e focos de pesquisa”. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, vol. 47, no. 1, 2011, pp. 03-14, http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/ciencias_sociais/article/view/1040/235. Acessado 10 nov. 2020.

Burchinal, Lee G. “The Communications Revolution: America's Third Century Challenge”. The Future of Organizing Knowledge: Papers Presented at the Texas A & M University Library's Centennial Academic Assembly. Organizado por Texas A & M University Libraries. 1976, https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/drew.whitworth/burchinal_the_communications_revolution.pdf. Acessado 18 nov. 2020.

Cabra-Torres, Fabiola et al. Information Literacy in Higher Education: a Sociocultural perspective. Springer, 2020.

Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany. “Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 82, 2014, pp. 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008. Acessado 10 nov. 2020.

Cloutier, Julie. “Qu'est-ce que l'innovation sociale?”. Centre de Recherche sur Innovations Sociales (CRISES), 2003, https://crises.uqam.ca/cahiers/et0314-quest-ce-que-linnovation-sociale/. Acessado 20 nov. 2020.

Corrêa, Elisa Cristina Delfini, e Castro Junior, Orlando Vieira de. “Perspectivas sobre competência em informação: diálogos possíveis”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 47, no. 2, 2018, pp. 35-51, http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/4156. Acessado 21 nov. 2019.

Dagnino, Renato. “Ciência e tecnologia para o desenvolvimento local: uma proposta transformadora”. Revista de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ano VIII, no 14, 2006, pp. 43-52, https://revistas.unifacs.br/index.php/rde/article/view/6/6. Acessado 26 ago. 2020.

Dudziak, Elisabeth Adriana. “Information literacy: princípios, filosofia e prática”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 32, no. 1, 2003, pp. 23-35, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652003000100003. Acessado 20 nov. 2020.

Engeström, Yrjö, e Miettinen, Reijo. “Introduction”. Perspectives on activity theory. Editado por Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, e R.J. Punamäki. Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 1-16.

Engeström, Yrjö, e Sannino, Annalisa. “Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges”. Educational Research Review, vol. 5, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002. Acessado 04 abr. 2021.

Engeström, Yrjö, e Sannino, Annalisa. “Whatever happened to process theories of learning?” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp. 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.002. Acessado 04 abr. 2021.

Engeström, Yrjö. “Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization”. Journal of Education and Work, vol. 14, no. 1, 2001, pp. 133-156, https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747. Acessado 03 abr. 2021.

Engeström, Yrjö. From teams to knots: activity theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Engeström, Yrjö. “Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice”. Perspectives on activity theory. Editado por Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, e R.J. Punamäki. Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 377-404.

Engeström, Yrjö. Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Engeström, Yrjö. Studies in expansive learning: learning what is not yet there. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Floridi, Luciano. The 4th Revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press, 2016.

Guile, David, e Young, Michael. “Transfer and transition in vocational education: some theoretical considerations”. Between school and work: new perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Editado por T. Tuomi-Gröhn, e Y. Engeström. Emerald Group Publishing Limited/ European Association for Learning and Instruction, 2003, pp. 63-81.

Hakkarainen, Kai, et al. Communities of networked expertise: professional and educational perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited/ European Association for Learning and Instruction, 2004.

Hall, Hazel, et al. “Exploring information literacy through the lens of Activity Theory”. 5th European Conference (ECIL): Saint Malo, Springer, 2017, pp. 803-812.

Hamelink, Cees. “An alternative to news”. Journal of Communication, vol. 26, no. 4, 1976, pp. 120-123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01947.x. Acessado 18 nov. 2020.

Harrisson, Denis, e Klein, Juan-Luis. “Introduction”. L’innovation sociale: émergence et effets sur la transformation des sociétés. Organizado por J.L. Klein e D. Harrisson. Presse Universitaires du Québec, 2007, pp. 1-14, http://extranet.puq.ca/media/produits/documents/1471_9782760521650.pdf. Acessado 24 nov. 2020.

Hatschbach, Maria Helena de Lima, e Olinto, Gilda. “Competências em informação: caminhos percorridos e novas trilhas”. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação: Nova Série, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 20-34, https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/64/78. Acessado 27 jun. 2021.

Hepworth, Mark. “Approaches to providing information literacy training in higher education: challenges for librarians”. New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol. 6, no. 1, 2000, pp. 21-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614530009516799. Acessado 27 maio 2021.

Hjørland, Birger, e Albrechtsen, Hanne. “Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, no. 6, 1995, pp. 400-425.

Howaldt, Jürgen, et al. “Social innovation: towards a new innovation paradigm”. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, vol. 17, no. 6, 2016, pp. 20-44, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44. Acessado em 10 nov. 2020.

Kuutti, Kari A. “Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research”. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Editado por B.A. Nardi. 1996, pp. 17-44.

Lave, Jean. Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Lave, Jean, e Wenger, Etienne. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Lloyd, Annemaree. Information literacy landscapes: Information Literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Chandos Publishing, 2010a.

Lloyd, Annemaree. “Lessons from the workplace: understanding information literacy as practice”. Practising Information Literacy: bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy together. Editado por A. Lloyd e S. Talja. Centre for Information Studies / Charles Sturt University, 2010b, pp. 29-49.

Lombard, Emmet. Pursuing information literacy: roles and relationships. Chandos, 2010.

Lupton, Mandy, e Bruce, Christine Susan. “Windows on information literacy worlds: generic, situated and transformative perspectives”. Practising Information Literacy: bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy together. Editado por A. Lloyd e S. Talja. Centre for Information Studies / Charles Sturt University, 2010, pp. 3-27.

Lupton, Mandy. Information literacy and learning, 2008, https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16665/1/Mandy_Lupton_Thesis.pdf. Queensland University of Technology. Tese de Doutorado. Acessado 16 nov. 2020.

Miettinen, Reijo. “Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes”. Social Studies of Science, vol. 28, no. 3, 1998, pp. 423-463, https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028003003. Acessado 14 abr. 2021.

Moulaert, Frank, et al. “Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice”. The international handbook of social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Editado por F. Moulaert, Diana MacCallum, Abid Mehmood, Abdelillah Hamdouch. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014, pp. 13-24.

Moulaert, Frank, et al. Social innovation as a trigger for transformations: the role of research. Publications Office of the European Union, 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/social-innovation-trigger-transformations_en. Acessado 10 jun. 2021.

Moulaert, Frank, et al. “Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation”. Urban Studies, vol. 42, no. 11, 2005, pp. 1969-1990, https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279893. Acessado em 13 fev. 2019.

Nardi, Bonnie A. “Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition”. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Editado por B.A. Nardi. 1996, pp. 69-102.

Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU). Transformando Nosso Mundo: A Agenda 2030 para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 2015, https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/91863-agenda-2030-para-o-desenvolvimento-sustentavel. Acessado 14 out. 2021.

Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (PNUD). Declaração do Milênio, 2000, https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/library/ods/declaracao-do-milenio.html. Acessado 14 out. 2021.

Querol, Marco Antonio Pereira, et al. “Teoria da Atividade: contribuições conceituais e metodológicas para o estudo da aprendizagem organizacional”. Gestão & Produção, vol. 21, no. 2, 2014, pp. 405-416, https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X351. Acessado 4 abr. 2021.

Righetto, Guilherme Goulart, e Vitorino, Elizete Vieira. “A competência em informação como movimento de inovação social”. Investigación Bibliotecológica, vol. 34, no. 82, 2020, pp. 29-52, https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2020.82.58080. Acessado 09 mar. 2020.

Roma, Júlio César. “Os objetivos de desenvolvimento do milênio e sua transição para os objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável”. Ciência e Cultura, vol. 71, no. 1, 2019, pp. 33-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.21800/2317-66602019000100011. Acessado 10 jun. 2021.

Rosetto, Márcia. Meios digitais, competência em informação e midiática: diferenciais ao ensino e práticas científicas. e-Publicar, 2021.

Sannino, Annalisa, et al. “Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice”. Learning and expanding with Activity Theory. Editado por A. Sannino, H. Daniels e K. Gutiérrez. Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 1-15.

Santos, Alessandra de Souza. “Competência em informação e inovação social”. Perspectivas em competência em informação. Organizado por M. Valentim e R.C.B. Belluzzo. ABECIN Editora, 2020, pp. 203-231.

Talja, Sanna, e Lloyd, Annemaree. “Integrating theories of learning, literacies and information practices”. Practising Information Literacy: bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy together. Editado por A. Lloyd e S. Talja. Centre for Information Studies / Charles Sturt University, 2010, pp. ix-xx.

Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Social Innovation in Europe (TEPSIE). Final Report Summary - TEPSIE (The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe), 2014, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/290771/reporting. Acessado 21 nov. 2020.

Tuomi-Gröhn, Terttu, e Engeström, Yrjö. “Conceptualizing transfer: from standard notions to developmental perspectives”. Between school and work: new perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Editado por T. Tuomi-Gröhn e Y. Engeström. Emerald Group Publishing Limited/ European Association for Learning and Instruction, 2003, pp. 19-38.

Tuomi-Gröhn, Terttu. “Developmental transfer as a goal of internship in practical nursing”. Between school and work: new perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Editado por T. Tuomi-Gröhn e Y. Engeström. Emerald Group Publishing Limited/ European Association for Learning and Instruction, 2003, pp. 199-231.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Conceptual relationship of information literacy and media literacy in knowledge societies, 2013, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/wsis/WSIS_10_Event/WSIS_-_Series_of_research_papers_-_Conceptual_Relationship_between_Information_Literacy_and_Media_Literacy.pdf. Acessado 10 jun. 2021.

Virkkunen, Jaakko. “Two theories of organizational knowledge creation”. Learning and expanding with Activity Theory. Editado por A. Sannino, H. Daniels e K.D. Gutiérrez, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 144-159.

Vygotsky, Lev Semionovitch. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.

Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Wenger, Etienne, et al. Cultivating Communities of Practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, 2002.

Whitworth, Andrew. Radical information literacy: reclaiming the political heart of the IL movement. Chandos, 2014.

Zurkowski, Paul G. The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Related Paper nº. 5, 1974, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED100391. Acessado 18 nov. 2020.

Published

2021-11-12

How to Cite

“Activity Theory in Understanding Information Literacy As a Social Innovation”. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, vol. 15, Nov. 2021, p. e02129, https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2021.v15.e02129.