The “Pink panther” in architecture
the transdisciplinary approach and thought without image
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45n2.p127Mots-clés :
Pink panther, Transdisciplinary approach, Rhizome, Nomadic thought, A thought without imageRésumé
As a form of in vivo knowledge, the transdisciplinary (TR) methodology suggests going beyond disciplines. According to Nicolescu, this methodology occurs at different levels of reality (ontological), different levels of perception (complexity), and within the logic of the included middle (logical) axioms that exist simultaneously. In addressing these levels, the researcher is the interlocutor between the external world of the Object and the internal world of the Subject. In architecture, this knowledge emerges through a variety of disciplines that need to be fused with an approach that is rhizomatic and nomadic, leading to thought without an image as characterized by Deleuze and Guattari. By following their “Pink Panther” metaphor for an imageless thought and approach (which does not imitate or reproduce something else) in TR, this article aims to understand the relationship between the TR methodology and the theory of thought without an image—an approach which can enable the comprehension of ambiguous architecture and urban design problems.
Téléchargements
Références
BAINS, P. Subjectless subjectivities. In: MASSUMI, B. (ed.). A shock to thought: Expressions after Deleuze and Guattari. London, New York: Routledge, 2002. p. 101-116.
BROWN, J. W. Deleuze’s Nietzschean revaluation: The image of thought / Thought without image. Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie Continentale Symposium, Ontario, v. 9, n. 1, p. 31-46, Spring 2005. Available at: https://www.pdcnet.org/symposium/content/symposium_2005_0009_0001_0031_0046. doi: 10.5840/symposium2005913. Accessed on: 23 Oct. 2021.
COLLETT, G. Philosophy, disciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in Deleuze and Guattari. In: COLLETT, G. (ed.). Deleuze, Guattari, and the problem of transdisciplinarity. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic, Nov. 2019. p. 1-14.
CROSS, N. Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer, 2006.
DELEUZE, G. Difference and repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994 (originally in 1968).
DELEUZE, G. Desert islands and other texts 1953 – 1974. In: LAPOUJADE, D. (ed.) .Semiotext(e) foreign agent series. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press, 2002.
DELEUZE, G.; GUATTARI, F. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
DELEUZE, G.; PARNET, C. Dialogues. Translated by H. Tomlinson; B. Habberjam. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987 (Originally in 1977).
DOUCET, I.; JANSSENS, N. Editorial: Transdisciplinarity, The hybridisation of knowledge production and Sspace-related research. In: DOUCET, I.; JANSSENS, N. (ed.). Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism. Towards hybrid modes of inquiry, urban and landscape perspectives. V. 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. p.1-14.
GENOSKO, G. Introduction: Félix Guattari in the age of semiocapitalism. In: GENOSKO, G. (ed.). Félix Guattari in the age of semiocapitalism. Deleuze Studies, Edinburgh, v. 6, n. 2, p. 149-169, 2012.
GUATTARI, F. Transdisciplinarity must become transversality. Theory, Culture & Society, v. 32, n. 5-6, p. 131-137, September 2015a. doi: 10.1177/0263276415597045.
GUATTARI, F. Psychoanalysis and transversality: Texts and interviews 1955 – 1971. Trans. A. Hodges. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2015b.
GUATTARI, F. Integrated world capitalism and molecular revolution. Text presented at the Conference on Information and/as New Spaces of Liberty (CINEL), Rio de Janeiro, 1981. Trans. A.T. Kingsmith, 2016. Available at: https://adamkingsmith.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/integrated-world-capitalism-and-molecular-revolution.pdf. Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2021.
HIRSCH HADORN, G. et al. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In: Hirsch Hadorn, G. et al. (ed.). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. p. 19-39.
HONAN, E. Writing a rhizome: An (Im)plausible methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, v. 20, n. 5, p. 531-546, Aug. 2007. doi: 10.1080/09518390600923735.
ITdNet. Workshop at the Td Conference 2008 on 27 November. Available at: http://www.uns.ethz.ch/translab/itdnet. Accessed on: 13 May 2011.
NICOLESCU, B. Manifesto of transdisiplinarity. USA: Suny Press, 2002.
NICOLESCU, B. Towards transdisciplinary education. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, Cape Town, v. 1, n. 1, p. 5-16, 2005.
NICOLESCU, B. Transdisciplinarity – Past, present and future. 2006. p. 1-36. Available at: https://www.basarab-nicolescu.ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/Docs_articles/Worldviews2006.htm. Accessed on: 10 nov. 2020.OSBORNE, P. Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics. Theory, Culture and Society, United Kingdom, v. 32, n. 5-6, p. 3-35, Jul. 2015. doi: doi.org/10.1177/0263276415592245.
PELBART, P. P. Cartography of exhaustion: Nihilism inside out. Trans. J. Laudenberger; F. Rebolledo Palazuelos. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2013.
PETERSEN, E. W. Design as seven steps of deterritorialization. In The making: Conference Proceedings Santa Anna IT Research Institute AB, 2005.
POHL, C.; HIRSCH HADORN, G. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Oekom Verlag GmbH, München: Oekom Verlag GmbH, 2007.
RENDELL, J. Working between and across: Some psychic dimensions of architecture’s inter- and transdisciplinarity. Architecture and Culture, United Kingdom, v. 1, n. 1, p. 128-140, Nov. 2013. doi: 10.2752/175145213X13756908698685.
SAP, H. A. Neo-materialism and urban planning, A contribution to new metaphoric understanding. Paper presented at the 2nd USO Build Conference. Lausanne, Swiss: Nov. 28-30 2002. Available at: http://www.has-architectuur.nl/res/artikelneomaterialism.pdf. Accessed on: 15 Nov. 2015.
SCHNEIDER, T. Discard an axiom. DOUCET, I.; JANSSENS, N. Editorial: Transdisciplinarity, The hybridisation of knowledge production and Sspace-related research. In: DOUCET, I.; JANSSENS, N. (ed.). Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism. Towards hybrid modes of inquiry, urban and landscape perspectives. V. 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. p. 97-115.
STARR, M. Wells meets Deleuze: The scientific romances reconsidered. North Carolina: McFarland and Company, 2017.
VALENZUELA-AGUILERA, A. Random urbanism: A multidimensional strategy of cognitive mapping, 2008. Available at: http://www.henrilefebvre.org/hlt/fls/Lefebvre_program2008.pdf. Accessed on: 12 Dec. 2019.
VOLCKMANN, R.; NICOLESCU, B. Transdisciplinarity: Basarab Nicolescu talks with Russ Volckmann. Integral Review, A Transdisciplinary and Transcultural Journal For New Thought, Research, and Praxis, Ohio, 4, 73 – 90, Jun. 2007. Available at: https://integral-review.org/transdisciplinarity-basarab-nicolescu-talks-with-russ-volckmann/. Accessed on: 07 Nov. 2018.
Recebido: 21/4/2021 - Aceito: 15/11/2021
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.