Was Lakatos an epistemic realist?
the role of truth in the Methodology of scientific research programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2020.v43esp.04.p47Keywords:
Imre Lakatos, Scientific Research Programmes, Epistemic Realism, Scientific Realism, TruthAbstract
A widespread interpretation of Lakatos’ work says his project completely sidestepped the question of truth as a central part of the analysis of scientific knowledge. In a similar vein, Hacking states that Lakatos found in methodology a substitute for truth. Even those who are skeptical of these interpretations agree that Lakatos failed to give an account of the relation between the growth of knowledge and increasing verisimilitude. In this paper I maintain that (a) the problem of truth is central to Lakatos’ philosophical project, and (b) it is possible to develop an alternative interpretation in which his project to establish a link between method and truth can be seen as successful. I put forward a Davidsonian interpretation that ascribes to Lakatos an epistemic realism.
References
AVGELIS, N. Lakatos on the evaluation of scientific theories. En K. Gavroglu et al. (eds.), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1989, p. 157– 167.
BORGE, B. Realismo Científico hoy: a 40 años de la formulación del Argumento del No-Milagro Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences v. 37 n.2, 2015, p. 221-233.
BORGE, B. Verdad y leyes de la naturaleza en la metodología de los programas de investigación científica. Signos Filosóficos. V. 37, n.1, 2017, p. 146-169.
DAVIDSON, D. The structure and content of truth. The journal of philosophy. V. 87, n. 6, 1990, p. 279-328.
DAVIDSON, D. Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
ENGELS, FRIEDRICH. Anti-D̈uhring: Herr D̈uhring's revolution in science. Foreign Languages Pub. House, 1894.
HACKING, IAN. Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. V. 30, n. 4, 1979, p. 381-402.
KUKLA, ANDRÉ. Studies in scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand, 1998.
NEWTON-SMITH, WILLIAM. The rationality of science. Routledge, 2002.
LARVOR, BRENDAN. Lakatos: an introduction. Psychology Press, 1998.
LAKATOS, IMRE, The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers. Vol. I (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978a.
LAKATOS, IMRE. Mathematics, science, and epistemology: Philosophical papers. Vol. II (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978b.
LIPTON, PETER. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge, 1991.
PAPINEAU, DAVID. Has Popper Been a Good Thing? Imre Lakatos and theories of scientific change. Amstardam: Springer Netherlands, 1989, p. 431-440.
PSILLOS, STATHIS. El giro realista en la filosofía de la ciencia. En: B. Borge y N. Gentile (Eds.) La ciencia y el mundo inobservable. Discusiones contemporáneas en torno al realismo científico. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2019, p. 49-96.
PUTNAM, HILARY. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975.
SMART, J. J. C. Methodology and ontology. En K. Gavroglu et al. (eds.). Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989, p. 47– 57.
Recebido: 31/3/2017 - Aceito: 11/11/2019
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an article published in open access under a Creative Commons license
.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.