“Science as cultural value” and “Science in a free society”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n6.e02400254Keywords:
Critical realism, Epistemicism/cognitivism, Value of scienceAbstract
Born in Helsinki in 1946, lkka Niiniluoto received a master's degree in mathematics in 1968 and a doctorate in theoretical philosophy in 1974 from the University of Helsinki. He was Associate Professor of Foundations of Mathematics from 1973 to 1977 and Professor of Theoretical Philosophy from 1977 to 2014. His prolific academic career includes positions as president of important philosophical societies and rector of the University of Helsinki. His main works are Is Science Progressive? (1984), Truthlikeness (1987), Critical Scientific Realism (2002), Truth-Seeking by Abduction (2018) and Beauty, Truth, and Justice (2022). His research explores the interfaces between Philosophy of Science, Epistemology, Logic, Theory of Truth and Axiology of scientific research. In Critical Scientific Realism Niiniluoto addresses the problem of the value of science, refuting a utilitarian instrumentalist conception and defending a socially responsible cognitivism in which science is conceived as a culturally valuable activity in its own right, without the need to satisfy criteria imposed by practical political and economic needs.
Downloads
References
BERNAL, J. D. The Social Function of Science. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1946.
BERNAL, J. D. Science in History. London: C. A. Watts, 1954.
BERNAL, J. D. Science in History. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969.
COHEN, J. L. Knowledge and Language. Selected essays. James Logue (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2002.
COHEN, L. J. What has Science to do with Truth? Synthese, v. 45, p. 489-510, 1980.
COHEN, L. J. Are There Ethical Reasons for Being, or not Being, a Scientific Realist, in Dalla Chiara et al. Structures and norms in science, p. 145-53, 1997.
COHEN, R. S.; HILPINEN, R.; RENZONG, Q. (ed.). Realism and Anti-realism in the Philosophy of Science. Beijing International Conference. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
FEYERABEND, P. K. Science in a Free Society. London: Verso, 1978.
FEYERABEND, P. K. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso, 1987.
FEYERABEND, P. K. How to defend society against Science. In: FEYERABEND, P. K. Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers, v. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
FEYERABEND, P. K. Contra o método. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP, [1975] 2007.
FULLER, S. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.
HABERMAS, J. Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann, 1971.
HARDIN, C.; ROSENBERG, A. In Defense of Convergent Realism, Philosophy of Science, v. 49, p. 604-615, 1982.
HARDING, S. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.
KITCHER, P. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
KORDIG, C. R. Feyerabend and Radical Meaning Variance. Noûs, v. 4, n. 4, p. 399-404, 1970.
LLOYD, E. Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism, Philosophy of Science, v. 64 (Proceedings), p. S396-S407, 1997.
MERTON, R. S. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
MILL, J. S. On Liberty. London, 1859.
MULKAY, M. Some Connections between the Quantitative History of Science, the Social History of Science, and the Sociology of Science. In: LOPPONEN, P. (ed.). Proceedings of the International Seminar on Science Studies, Helsinki, v. 4, p. 54-76, 1977.
MUNEVAR, G. Beyond Reason. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.
NIINILUOTO, I. On the Truthlikeness of Generalizations. In: BUTTS, R. E.; HINTIKKA, J. (ed.). Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 121-47, 1977.
NIINILUOTO, I. Truthlikeness: Comments on Recent Discussion. Synthese, v. 38, p. 281-329, 1978.
NIINILUOTO, I. Scientific Progress. Synthese, v. 45, p. 427-464, 1980.
NIINILUOTO, I. Language, Norms, and Truth. In: PORN, I. (ed.). Essays in Philosophical Analysis. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki, v. 32, p. 168-189, 1981.
NIINILUOTO, I. 'Ernst Mach as a Philosopher of Science', in Essays in Honour of Kalevi Vihtori Laurikainen, Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Series A.VI. Physica 431. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science, 190-203, 1986(a).
NIINILUOTO, I. 'Imagination and Fiction', Journal of Semantics, 4: 209-22, 1986(d).
NIINILUOTO, I. Realism, Relativism, and Constructivism. Synthese, v. 89, p. 135-162, 1991.
NIINILUOTO, I. Critical scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
NIINILUOTO, I. Truthlikeness: old and new debates. Synthese, v. 197, p. 1581-1599, 2020.
POPPER, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959.
POPPER, K. R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Hutchinson, 1963.
PRESTON, J. On Some Objections to Relativism. Ratio, v. NS 5, n. 1, p. 57-73, 1992.
PRESTON, J. Feyerabend's Retreat from Realism, Philosophy of Science, v. 64 (Proceedings), p. S421-S431, 1997.
RORTY, R. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Philosophical Papers, v. i. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
SHAPIN, S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
SIEGEL, H. Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1987.
SIEGEL, H. Educating Reason: Rationality, Thinking, and Education. New York: Routledge, 1988.
SILVA, V. C. O valor da Ciência: O debate entre a concepção epistêmica e o reducionismo utilitarista na Filosofia da Ciência de Ilkka Niiniluoto. Pensando, v. 10, n. 20, 2019.
SILVA, V. C. O valor da ciência e a superação da dicotomia entre o epistemicismo e o instrumentalismo utilitário. In: MOTTA, M. C. M.; VIDEIRA, A. A. P. FRAGOZO, F. (org.). Perspectivas contemporâneas em Filosofia da Ciência. 1. ed. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2021, v. 2, p. 1-26.
SILVA, V. C. Realismo crítico e teoria axiológica da verdade como condições para a confiança nas ciências. In: GURGEL, I. (org.). Por que confiar nas ciências? Epistemologias para o nosso tempo. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2023, v. 1, p. 391-428.
ZIMAN, J. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1994.
Recebido: 24/07/2024 – Aprovado: 12/08/2024 – Publicado: 23/08/2024
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Trans/Form/Ação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons license.