Some Morals from the Physico-Mathematical Character of Scientific Laws

Autores

  • Cristian Soto Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2020.v43n4.04.p65

Palavras-chave:

Scientific laws, laws of nature, mathematics, metaphysics, ontology

Resumo

This article derives some morals from the examination of the physico-mathematical view of scientific laws and its place in the current debate. After revisiting the expression scientific law, which appears in scientific practice under various names (laws, principles, equations, symmetries, and postulates), I briefly assess two extreme, opposite positions in the literature on laws, namely, full-blown metaphysics of laws of nature, which distinguishes such laws from the more mundane laws that we find in science; and the no-laws thesis, which ultimately contends that we should dispense with laws in science altogether. I argue that both positions fail to make sense of the laws that we find in scientific practice. For this, I outline the following twofold claim: first, most laws (in physics) are abstract mathematical statements; and second, they express some of the best physical generalisations achieved in this branch of science. Thus understood, a minimal construal of laws suggests that they are in principle intended to refer to those features of phenomena whose salience and stability are relevant for specific scientific tasks. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Cristian Soto, Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Chile

Profesor, Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Chile. Ph.D. in Philosophy (Philosophy of Science), University of Melbourne

Referências

ARMSTRONG, David. Defending Cateogoricalism. In BIRD, Alexander, Brian ELLIS and Howard SANKEY (eds.). Properties, Powers, and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York and London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 27-33.

CARROLL, John. Readings on Laws of Nature. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004.

CARTWRIGHT, Nancy. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon

Press, 1983.

CARTWRIGHT, Nancy. The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

DORATO, Mauro. The Laws of nature and the Effectiveness of Mathematics. In BINIOLO, Giovanni, Paolo BUDINICH, and Majda TROBOK (eds.). The Role of Mathematics in Physical Sciences: Interdisciplinary and Physical Aspects. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, pp. 131-144, 2005a.

DORATO, Mauro. Why Are (Most) Laws of Nature Mathematical? In FAYE, Jan, Paul NEEDHAM, Uwe SCHEFFLER, and Max URCHS (eds.). Nature’s Principles. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, pp. 55-75, 2005b.

DORATO, Mauro. The Software of the Universe. An introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005c.

EARMAN, John. In Defense of Laws: Reflections on Bas van Fraassen’s Laws and Symmetry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 53, n. 2, pp. 413-419, 1993.

ELLIS, Brian. Scientific Essentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

ELLIS, Brian. The Categorical Dimension of the Causal Powers. In BIRD, Alexander, Brian ELLIS and Howard SANKEY (eds.). Properties, Powers, and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York and London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 11-26

FEYNMAN, Richard. The Character of a Physical Law. London: Penguin Books, 1965.

GIERE, Ronald. Science without Laws. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.

HOLTON, Gerald and Stephen BRUSH. Physics, the human Adventure. From Copernicus to Einstein and Beyond. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press, 2006.

LANGE, Marc. Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

LANGE, Marc. Laws and Lawmakers. Science, metaphysics and the Laws of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

MORRISON, Margaret. Reconstructing Reality. Models, Mathematics, and Simulations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

MUMFORD, Stephen. Laws in Nature. London and New York, Routledge, 2004.

PINCOCK, Christopher. Mathematical Structural Realism. In BOKULICH, Alisa and Peter BOKULICH (eds.). Scientific Structuralism. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, pp. 67-79.

PSILLOS, Stathis. Anti-Nominalistic Scientific Realism: a Defence. In BIRD, Alexander, Brian ELLIS and Howard SANKEY (eds.). Properties, Powers, and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York and London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 63-80.

ROBERTS, John. The Law-Governed Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

ROBERTS, John. Measurements, Laws, and Counterfactuals. In MUMFORD, Stephen and Matthew TUGBY (eds.). Metaphysics and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 29-47.

RUBY, Jane. The Origins of Scientific Law. Journal of the History of Ideas, 47, pp. 341-359, 1986.

SOTO, Cristian. The Epistemic Indispensability Argument. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, v. 50, n. 1, pp. 45-61, 2019.

SOTO, Cristian. Wigner, las Leyes Físicas y la Efectividad de las Matemáticas. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de las Ciencias, v. 20, n. 40, pp. 93-127, 2020.

SOTO, Cristian and Josu ARMENDÁRIZ. On the Intertwining of Models and Laws: Against Nomolofical Eliminativism. In Cristian SOTO (ed.), Current Debates in Philosophy of Science: In Honor of Roberto Torretti. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Verlag, forthcoming.

SOTO, Cristian and Otávio BUENO. A Framework for an Inferential Conception of Physical Laws. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 423-444, 2019.

SOTO, Cristian and Pascal RODRÍGUEZ. Capacidades y Leyes Fenomenológicas. Una Aproximación Experimentalista. Revista de Filosofía, 76, pp. 185-201, 2019.

SOTO, Cristian and Diego ROMERO. Local Selective Realism: Shifting from Classical to Quantum Electrodynamics. Foundations of Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09663-3, pp. 1-16, 2020.

SWARTZ, Norman. The Concept of Physical Law. British Columbia: Simon Fraser University, second edition, 2003.

SWARTZ, Norman. Laws of Nature. Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/lawofnat/, 2009. Accessed 13 June 2015

TEGMARK, Max. Our Mathematical Universe. My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. London: Penguin Books, 2014.

VAN FRAASSEN, Bas. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

WOODWARD, James. Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York, Oxford University Press, 2003.

WOODWARD, James. Laws, Causes, and Invariance. In MUMFORD, Stephen and Matthew TUGBY (eds.). Metaphysics and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 48-72, 2013.

WOODWARD, James. Physical Modality, Laws, and Counterfactuals. Synthese, April, 2017.

WOODWARD, James. Laws: An Invariance-Based Account. In OTT, Walter and Lydia PATTON (eds.), Laws of Nature. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 158-180, 2018.

Recebido: 15/6/2017 - Aceito: 27/12/20191

Downloads

Publicado

2020-11-20 — Atualizado em 2021-08-30

Como Citar

Soto, C. (2021). Some Morals from the Physico-Mathematical Character of Scientific Laws. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista De Filosofia, 43(4), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2020.v43n4.04.p65

Edição

Seção

Artigos e Comentários