Por que não somos só o nosso cérebro: em defesa do enativismo
en defensa del enactivismo
Palavras-chave:
enativismo, cognitivismo, representações mentais, faláciasResumo
No artigo “Por que somos o nosso cérebro: o enativismo posto em questão” (neste volume), Pereira e colaboradores levantam uma bateria de críticas ao enativismo, que é uma família de abordagens nas ciências cognitivas que confere centralidade ao corpo e à ação autônoma dos organismos nas explicações dos seus processos cognitivos. As investidas dos autores miram alguns conceitos centrais da proposta enativista, como conhecimento prático, corporificação (ou corporeidade) e regularidades sensório-motoras. Eu argumento que as críticas de Pereira et al. não procedem por razões diversas: algumas assumem o que querem provar, outras conferem peso excessivo a intuições sobre cenários ficcionais e, por fim, outras atacam espantalhos que não representam as posições enativistas. Nenhum dos pontos que levanto em defesa o enativismo são novos, mas considero importantes explicitá-los para tornar o debate sobre filosofia das ciências cognitivas mais claro.
Downloads
Referências
AUSTIN, J. L. Other Minds. In: URMSON, J. O.; WARNOCK, G. J. (ed.). J. L. Austin: Philosophical Papers. London: Oxford University Press, 1970. p. 76-116.
BRUINEBERG, J.; KIVERSTEIN, J.; RIETVELD, E. The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, v. 195, n. 6, p. 2417-2444, jun. 2018.
CHEMERO, A. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2009.
DEHAENE, S. Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. New York: Penguin Books, 2009.
DE JAEGHER, H.; DI PAOLO, E.; GALLAGHER, S. Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 14, n. 10, p. 441-447, out. 2010.
DI PAOLO, E.; BUHRMANN, T.; BARANDIARAM, X. Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
FODOR, J. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.
GALLAGHER, S. How the Body Shapes the Mind. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 2005.
GALLAGHER, S.; BOWER, M. Making enactivism even more embodied. Avant, v. 5, n. 2, p. 232-247, 2014.
GELDER, T. VAN. What might cognition be if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, v. 91, p. 345-381, 1995.
GOULD, S. J.; LEWONTIN, R. C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Biological Sciences, v. 205, n. 1161, p. 581-598, 1979.
HANYU-DEUTMEYER, A. A.; CASCELLA, C.; VARACALLO, A. Phantom Limb Pain. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448188/. Acesso em: 22 set. 2021.
HURLEY, S.; NOË, A. Neural Plasticity and Consciousness. Biology & Philosophy, v. 18, n. 1, p. 131-168, jan. 2003.
HUTTO, D. D. Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 4, n. 4, p. 389-405, 2005.
HUTTO, D. D.; MYIN, E. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013.
HUTTO, D. D.; MYIN, E. Evolving Enactivism: Basic Minds Meet Content. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2017.
IHDE, D.; MALAFOURIS, L. Homo faber revisited: Postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Philosophy & Technology, v. 32, n. 2, p. 195-214, 2019.
KIRCHHOFF, M. D.; ROBERTSON, I. Enactivism and predictive processing: a non-representational view. Philosophical Explorations, v. 21, n. 2, p. 264-281, maio 2018.
KIVERSTEIN, J.; RIETVELD, E. The Primacy of Skilled Intentionality: on Hutto & Satne’s the Natural Origins of Content. Philosophia (United States), v. 43, n. 3, p. 701-721, 2015.
KIVERSTEIN, J.; RIETVELD, E. Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal. Adaptive Behavior, v. 26, n. 4, p. 147-163, 23 ago. 2018.
KLIEMANN, D. et al. Intrinsic Functional Connectivity of the Brain in Adults with a Single Cerebral Hemisphere. Cell Reports, v. 29, n. 8, p. 2398-2407.e4, nov. 2019.
LALAND, K. N. et al. The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 282, n. 1813, 2015.
LALAND, K. N.; MATTHEWS, B.; FELDMAN, M. W. An introduction to niche construction theory. Evolutionary Ecology, v. 30, n. 2, p. 191-202, 2016.
LALAND, K. N.; ODLING-SMEE, J.; FELDMAN, M. W. Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 23, n. 1, p. 131-146, fev. 2000.
LEWONTIN, R. Gene, organism, and environment. In: BENDALL, D. S. (ed.). Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
LEWONTIN, R. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000.
MORENO, A.; UMEREZ, J.; IBAÑEZ, J. Cognition and Life: The Autonomy of Cognition. Brain and Cognition, v. 34, n. 1, p. 107-129, jun. 1997.
MYIN, E.; VAN DEN HERIK, J. C. A twofold tale of one mind: revisiting REC’s multi-storey story. Synthese, 5 set. 2020.
NOË, A. Action in Perception. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2004.
NOË, A. Varieties of Presence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2012.
ODLING-SMEE, J.; LALAND, K. N.; FELDMAN, M. W. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
O’REGAN, J. K.; NOË, A. What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience. Synthese, v. 129, n. 1, p. 79-103, 2001a.
O’REGAN, J. K.; NOË, A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 24, n. 05, p. 939-973, 18 out. 2001b.
OYAMA, S. The Ontogeny of Information. 2. ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
PAIS-VIEIRA, M. et al. A Brain-to-Brain Interface for Real-Time Sharing of Sensorimotor Information. Scientific Reports, v. 3, n. 1, 28 dez. 2013.
RAMAKRISHNAN, A. et al. Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet. Scientific Reports, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10767, 9 set. 2015.
RAMSEY, W. M. Representation Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
REIS, C. R. M. dos; ARAÚJO, L. A. L. Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Neither Synthesis Nor Extension. Biological Theory, v. 15, n. 2, p. 57-60, 16 jun. 2020.
RIETVELD, E.; KIVERSTEIN, J. A Rich Landscape of Affordances. Ecological Psychology, v. 26, n. 4, p. 325-352, 2 out. 2014.
ROLLA, G. A mente enativa. Porto Alegre: a Fi, 2021a.
ROLLA, G. Contra intuições. Filosofia Unisinos, v. 22, n. 1, p. 21-28, 2021b.
ROLLA, G. Do babies represent? On a failed argument for representationalism. Synthese, v. 200, n. 4, p. 278-278, ago. 2022.
ROLLA, G.; FIGUEIREDO, N. Bringing forth a world, literally. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3 ago. 2021.
ROLLA, G.; HUFFERMANN, J. Converging enactivisms: radical enactivism meets linguistic bodies. Adaptive Behavior, 2021.
ROWLANDS, M. The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2010.
SACKS, O. Hallucinations. New York: Knopf, 2012.
SCHETTLER, A.; RAJA, V.; ANDERSON, M. L. The Embodiment of Objects: Review, Analysis, and Future Directions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, v. 13, 13 dez. 2019.
SHOKUR, S. et al. Expanding the primate body schema in sensorimotor cortex by virtual touches of an avatar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 110, n. 37, p. 15121-15126, 10 set. 2013.
STANLEY, J. Know How. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 2011.
STANLEY, J.; WILLIAMSON, T. Knowing How. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 98, n. 8, p. 411-444, 2001.
STERELNY, K. From hominins to humans: How sapiens became behaviourally modern. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 366, n. 1566, p. 809-822, 2011.
THOMPSON, E. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of the Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.
THOMPSON, E.; COSMELLI, D. Brain in a Vat or Body in a World? Brainbound versus Enactive Views of Experience. Philosophical Topics, v. 39, n. 1, p. 164-180, 2011.
VARELA, F. J.; THOMPSON, E.; ROSCH, E. The Embodied Mind. Revised ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2016.
WERNER, K. Enactment and construction of the cognitive niche: toward an ontology of the mind-world connection. Synthese, v. 197, n. 3, p. 1313-1341, 2020.
Recebido: 11/09/2022
Aceito: 03/01/2023
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons.
Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution License.