Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.06.p112

Keywords:

Alternative Metrics, Traditional Metrics, Open Access Publishing, Dimensions database, Pearson's coefficient

Abstract

The connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between the traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample comprised the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 5,982 altmetric data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetric data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating it is important for indicating the tools and networks where readers and users share scientific content.         

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Juliana Fachin, Federal University of Santa Catarina

    PhD Student and Master from the Graduate Program in Information Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina. Capes Scholarship. It operates in the following research groups: Instituto Biblion; NUPEARC - Center for research and studies in contemporary archives; Web Information Metrics Studies Lab (Lab-iMetrics). Develops research in: Open Access Scientific Publication; Altmetria and its applications. Since 2013, she has been managing editor at Ágora Magazine: Archivology under discussion at UFSC. Brazil Santa Catarina.

  • Ronaldo Ferreira Araújo, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL)

    PhD and MSc in Information Science, Graduate Program in Information Science, School of Information Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). He is Associate Professor of the Library Course at the Institute of Human Sciences, Communication and Arts (ICHCA), Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL). Professor and Vice-Coordinator of the Graduate Program in Information Science (PPGCI / UFAL) and Professor of the Graduate Program in Knowledge Management and Organization of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPG-GOC / UFMG). Leader of the "Web Information Metric Studies Laboratory" (Lab-iMetrics) and the Information and Communication Policy and Technology Research Groups (GPoliTICs). Researcher at the National Institute of Science & Technology in Digital Democracy (INCT-DD). Editor of the scientific journal "Information Science in Review". Ad Hoc Consultant of the State of Alagoas Research Support Foundation (FAPEAL). Brazil, Alagoas.

  • Ursula Blattmann, Federal University of Santa Catarina

    Prof. Dr. from the Federal University of Santa Catarina in the areas of Librarianship, Archivology and Information Science. Leader of the Biblion Research Institute and researcher at the NUPEAC Contemporary Archives Research Nucleus of the UFSC Department of Information Science. She is editor of the Ágora Magazine: archivology under discussion at UFSC, Brazil Santa Catarina.

References

Anglada, Luís, and Abadal, Ernest. ¿Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario Thinkepi. vol. 12, 2018, pp.292-298.

Analytics SciELO. Distribuição por tipo de documentos, língua e país dos autores. 2019. https://analytics.scielo.org/w/publication/article. Accessed 07 dez. 2019.

Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira, and Caran, Gustavo Miranda, and Souza, Iara Vidal Pereira. Orientação temática e coeficiente de correlação para análise comparativa entre altmetrics e citações. Em Questão. vol. 22, no.3, 2016, pp.184-200.

Araujo, Ronaldo Ferreira. Marketing científico digital e métricas de mídias sociais: indicadores-chave de desempenho de periódicos no Facebook. Informação & Sociedade, João Pessoa. vol. 28, no. 1, 2018, pp.7-22.

Barros, Moreno. Altmetrics: métricas alternativas de impacto científico com base em redes sociais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte. vol. 20, no. 2, 2015, pp. 19-37.

Belcher, Wendy Laura. Wrinting your journal article in 12 Weeks: A guide to academic Publishing success. California: SAGE Publication, 2009.

Bormann, Lutz. Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, Springer. vol. 103, no. 3, Jun. 2015, pp. 1123-1144.

Bornmann, Lutz, and Marx, Werner. Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier. vol. 9, no. 2, Apr. 2015, pp.408-418.

Cervo, Amado Luiz, and Bervian, Pedro Alcino, and Silva, Roberto da. Metodologia científica. São Paulo: Prentice Hall, 2007.

Dimensions. Métricas de Publicação: Revista Estudos Feminista. 2019. https://app.dimensions.ai/analytics/publication/viz/overview-publications?and_facet_journal=jour.1027806. Accessed 26 Jun. 2019.

Dimensions. About. 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnIBisqwpNw&feature=youtu.be. Accessed 15 Jul. 2019.

Digital Science. About. 2019. https://www.digital-science.com/institutions/. Accessed 15 Jul. 2019.

Digital Science. About Dimensions. 2019. https://www.digital-science.com/products/dimensions/. Accessed 05 May 2019.

Erdt, Mojisola, and Nagarajan, Aarthy, and Sin, Sei-Ching Joanna, and Theng, Yin-Leng. Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics, Springer. vol.109, no.2, 2016, pp. 1117-1166.

Garfield, Eugene. Citation Analysis as a tool in Journal Evaluation: journal scan be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, Washington DC. vol. 178, no. 4060, Nov. 1972, pp. 471-479.

Iamarino, Atila. Você compartilha, eu curto e nós geramos métricas. SciELO em Perspectiva, 2013. http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2013/08/08/voce-compartilha-eu-curto-e-nos-geramos-metricas/. Accessed 14 Jul. 2019.

Koon-Kiu, Yan, and Mark, Gerstein. The Spread of Scientific Information: Insights from the Web Usage Statistics in PLOS Article-Level Metrics. PLoS ONE, Califórnia. vol. 6, no.5, May 2011, 19917.

Mukaka, M. M. A guide to appropriate uso of Correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, Blantyre. vol. 24, no. 3, Sep. 2012, pp. 69–71.

Priem, Jason. et al. Altmetrics: A manifesto. 1ed. 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed 10 May 2019.

Priem, Jason, and Groth, Paul, and Taraborelli, Dario. The Altmetrics Collection. PLoS ONE, Califórnia. vol.7, no.11, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048753. Accessed 10 Jul. 2019.

Revista Estudos Feminista. Histórico. 2018. https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/about/editorialTeam. Accessed 14 Jul. 2019.

Revista Estudos Feminista. Foco e escopo. 2019. https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/about/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope. Accessed 10 May 2019.

Silva Filho, Rubens da Costa, and Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza. Visibilidade Científica em acesso aberto nas mídias sociais: uma análise altmétrica da Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem. Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria: Rio de Janeiro. July 2018.

Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza. A Bibliometria no Brasil: análise temática das publicações do periódico Ciência da Informação (1972-2002). Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação. Belo Horizonte: ANCIB, vol. 5, 2003.

Zahedi, Zohreh, and Costas, Rodrigo, and Wouters, Paul. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, Springer. vol. 101, no.2, Nov. 2014, pp. 1491–1513

Downloads

Published

2020-03-27

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 - jan-mar (2020)

Section

Papers

License

When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.

The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Creative Commons License  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

 

How to Cite

“Alternative and Traditional Indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal”. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, vol. 14, no. 1 - jan-mar, Mar. 2020, pp. 112-29, https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.06.p112.

Most read articles by the same author(s)