Una Taxonomía de relaciones semánticas para la representación del conocimiento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2021.v15.e02123Palabras clave:
Relaciones semánticas, Representación del conocimiento, Organización del conocimiento, Taxonomía de relaciones semánticasResumen
Semantic relations in knowledge representation characterizes the association between the concepts of a domain. Concepts are units of knowledge and the relationships that link these units, which gives meaning to the knowledge as represented. In this way, semantic relations allow users to assimilate the purpose of the association between concepts in the presentational context, avoiding misinterpretation of the information, mainly that presented in instruments of knowledge representation.The objective of this paper is to propose a taxonomy of semantic relations that compiles the different approaches on the subject. The methodology applied bibliographic research for theoretical foundation and literature review based on the main bibliographic references on semantic relations. As result, some classifications of semantic relations were found to have been raised by different authors, each offering a singular point of view, which has resulted in a range of discordant terms. To answer this need, a taxonomy was arrived at of sixty-three semantic relations, including a new relation discovered by this study, dubbed here ‘subordinate agent’.
Descargas
Referencias
Almeida, Maurício Barcellos, and Emygdio, Jeanne Louize. "Uma investigação teórica sobre relações semânticas partitivas e sua aplicação em sistemas de organização do conhecimento”. Informação & Informação, vol. 24, no.2, 2019, pp. 31-37.
Beghtol, Clare. "Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning”. Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Springer, 2001, pp. 99-113.
Broughton, Vanda. "A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology: conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification”. Axiomathes, vol. 18, no.2, 2008, pp. 193-210.
Broughton, Vanda, et al. Knowledge organization. Royal School of Library and Information Science, 2005.
Campos, Maria Luiza de Almeida. "Modelização de domínios de conhecimento: uma investigação de princípios fundamentais”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 33, 2004, pp. 22-32.
Chaffin, Roger, and Herrmann, Douglas J. "The similarity and diversity of semantic relations”. Memory & Cognition, vol. 12, no.2, 1984, pp. 134-141.
Cruse, D. Alan. "Hyponymy and its varieties”. The semantics of relationships. Springer, 2002, pp. 3-21.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. "Teoria do conceito”. Ciência da informação. vol. 7, no. 2, 1978.
Gerstl, Peter, and Pribbenow, Simone. "A conceptual theory of part-whole relations and its applications”. Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 20, no. 3, 1996, pp. 305-322.
Green, Rebecca, and Bean, Carol A. Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview. Relationships in the organization of knowledge, 2001, pp. 3-18.
Green, Rebecca, et al., editors. The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Green, Rebecca. "Relationships in knowledge organization”. Knowledge organization, vol. 35, no. 2-3, 2008, pp. 150-159.
Hasan, Ali Muttaleb, et al. "A proposed method using the semantic similarity of WordNet 3.1 to handle the ambiguity to apply in social media text”. Information Science and Applications. Springer, 2020, pp. 471-483.
Hjørland, Birger. "Semantics and knowledge organization”. Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 41 no.1, 2007, pp. 367-405.
Hosseini, Mitra Bokaei, et al. "Analyzing privacy policies through syntax-driven semantic analysis of information types”. Information and Software Technology, vol. 138, 2021, pp. 106-608.
ISO 25964-1. ISO 25964-1: Information and documentation. Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies — Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. International Standard, 2011.
Khoo, Christopher SG, and Na, Jin‐Cheon. "Semantic relations in information science”. Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 40, no. 1, 2006, pp. 157-228.
Koeva, Svetla. Semantic relations and conceptual frames. Towards a Semantic Network Enriched with a Variety of Semantic Relations, 2020, pp. 7-20.
Kuczora, Paul W., and Cosby, Steve J. "Implementation of meronymic (part-whole) inheritance for semantic networks”. Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 2, no. 4, 1989, pp. 219-227.
Lyons, John. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos. Representação de relações semânticas de lugar em sistemas de organização do conhecimento. Informação&Informação, 2019.
Maia, Lucinéia Souza. Extração e explicitação de relações semânticas para a representação do conhecimento de documentos acadêmicos: um estudo de caso a partir de uma estrutura classificatória, 2018, Federal University of Minas Gerais, PhD dissertation.
Mazzocchi, Fulvio. "Relations in KOS: is it possible to couple a common nature with different roles?”. Journal of Documentation, vol. 73, no. 2, 2017, pp. 368-383.
Murphy, M. Lynne. Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Murphy, M. Lynne, and Koskela, Anu. Key terms in semantics. A&C Black, 2010.
Peters, Isabella, and Weller, Katrin. "Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems”. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis, vol. 59, no. 2, 2008, pp. 100-107.
Prodanov, Cleber Cristiano, and Freitas, Ernani Cesar De. Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2 ed., Feevale, 2013.
Soergel, Dagobert. “Knowledge organization systems: overview”. 2009.
Stock, Wolfgang G. "Concepts and semantic relations in information science”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 10, 2010, pp. 1951-1969.
Storey, Vede C. "Understanding semantic relationships”. The VLDB Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, 1993, pp. 455-488.
Vickery, Brian Campbell. “Thesaurus-A new word in documentation”. Journal of documentation, vol. 16, no.4, 1960, pp. 181-189.
Weller, Katrin, and Stock, Wolfgang G. “Transitive Meronymy”. Automatic consept-based quiery expansion, vol. 59, no. 3, 2008, pp. 165-170.
Winston, Morton E., et al. “A taxonomy of part‐whole relations”. Cognitive science, vol. 11, no. 4, 1987, pp. 417-444.
Zeng, Marcia Lei. “Knowledge organization systems (KOS)”. Knowledge organization, vol. 35, no. 2-3, 2008, pp. 160-182.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Lucinéia Souza Maia, Gercina Ângela de Lima
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Al someter un artículo, los autores conservan los derechos de autor del artículo, otorgando todos los derechos para el Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends para publicar el texto.
El(los) autor(es) acuerdan que el artículo, si se acepta editorialmente para su publicación, tendrá licencia bajo Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa /4.0).
Los lectores/usuarios son libres para:
- Compartir - copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
- Adaptar - remezclar, transformar y construir sobre el material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades mientras siga los términos de la licencia. Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución: debe otorgar el crédito apropiado, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Puede hacerlo de manera razonable, pero de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda en su uso.
Compartir igual: si remezcla, transforma o desarrolla el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Sin restricciones adicionales: no puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros de hacer cualquier cosa que la licencia permita.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
- No se otorgan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para su uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como publicidad, privacidad o derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que usa el material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License