Transversality in Knowledge Production and Organization
analysis of the scientific production of CNPq Research Productivity Fellows in Information Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2023.v17.e023050Keywords:
Transversality, Knowledge Organization, Domain analysis, Citation analysis, CNPq Research Productivity Fellows, Information ScienceAbstract
This paper considers the scientific production domain of research productivity fellows in Information Science, in Brazil, as an object of analysis on transversality in production and Knowledge Organization. Data is collected from a database containing all productivity fellows of Information Science and their scientific production (1974-2020). The Chen's (2017) methodology is used to characterize the Information Science domain, constituting a corpus of 63 articles on the topic, distributed between 1996 and 2020. Results identify comprehensive contributions on concepts, theories and methodologies used by the productivity fellows. The period from 2011 to 2020 was the most productive (89% of the total number of articles), with significant growth observed from 2017 onwards. The production was published in 26 journals, of which four account for 46% of the articles. The clusters of thematic co-occurrence and authors referenced by the PQs suggest the sense of transversality from the perspective of KO systems, classification, information retrieval, as well as their relationships with Concept Theory and archival diplomacy, as an active nucleus research in focus. It is observed that subjects that are not exclusive to a specific discipline or area of knowledge are fully accepted in this production, crossing them, and starting to enrich them.
Downloads
Metrics
References
BOURDIEU, Pierre. O campo científico. In: ORTIZ, R. Pierre Bourdieu. São Paulo: Ática, 1983. (Coleção Grandes Cientistas Sociais).
BRASIL. Parecer CNE/CEB nº 7/2010, aprovado em 7 de abril de 2010. Brasília: MEC, 2010. Disponível em: https://normativasconselhos.mec.gov.br/normativa/view/CNE_PAR_CNECEBN72010.pdf?query=INOVA%C3%87%C3%83O. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2023.
BUFREM, Leilah Santiago; FREITAS, Juliana Lazzarotto. Interdomínios na literatura periódica científica da ciência da informação. DataGramaZero, v. 16, n. 4, 2015. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/8295. Acesso em: 09 jul. 2023.
BUFREM, Leilah Santiago; FREITAS, Juliana Lazzarotto; COSTA, Francisco Daniel de Oliveira. Organização transversal do conhecimento: possibilidades na área da informação. Ponto de Acesso, v. 2, n. 3, p. 43-57, 2008. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaici/article/view/3212. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2023.
CHEN, Chaomei. Science Mapping: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, v.2, n 2, p. 1-40, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006.
DAHLBERG, Ingetraut. Teoria do conceito. Ciência da Informação, v.7, n. 2, p. 101-107, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v7i2.115.
DAHLBERG, Ingetraut. Knowledge organization: its scope and possibilities. Knowledge Organization, v. 20, n. 4, p. 211-222, 1993. Disponível em: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-1993-4-211.pdf. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2023.
DAHLBERG, Ingetraut. Knowledge organization: a new science. Knowledge Organization, v. 33, n. 1, p. 11-19, January 2006. Disponível em: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2006-1-11.pdf. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2023.
GARCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Antonio. Cientificamente favelados: uma visão crítica do conhecimento a partir da epistemografia. TransInformação, Campinas, v. 18, n. 2, p. 103-112, maio/ago., 2006. Disponível em: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6330. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2023.
GARFORTH Lisa; KERR, Ann. Interdisciplinarity and the social sciences: capital, institutions and autonomy. The British Journal of Sociology, v. 62, n. 4, 2011. DOI: https://doi-org.ez18.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01385.x
GOLDMANN, Lucien. Las ciencias humanas y la filosofía. Buenos Aires: Galatea Nueva Vision, 1958.
GONZÁLEZ DE GÓMEZ, Maria Nélida. Tecnologias digitais e análise do regime de informação para a promoção da saúde coletiva. Informação em Pauta, v. 3, p. 9-29, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32810/2525-3468.ip.v3iEspecial.2018.39711.9-29.
GRANGER, Gilles-Gaston. A ciência e as ciências. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP, 1994. 122 p.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves. A dimensão teórica do tratamento temático da informação e suas interlocuções com o universo científico da International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO). Revista Ibero-americana de Ciência da Informação (RICI), v. 1, n. 1, p.77-99, jan./jun. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v1.n1.2008.940.
HJØRLAND, Birger; ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain‐analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1995, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6%3C400::AID-ASI2%3E3.0.CO;2-Y.
HJØRLAND, Birger. The method of constructing classification schemes: a discussion of the state-of-the-art. In: INTERNATIONAL ISKO CONFERENCE, 7., 10-13 July 2002, Granada, Spain. Proceedings of… Spain: Ergon Verlag, 2002. (Advances in Knowledge Organization, v. 8. p. 451). Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317715397. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2023.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Approaches to knowledge organization. Aula ministrada na University of Rome La Sapienza, 20 Abr. 2007. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277795616_Approaches_to_Knowledge_Organization_KO_Lecture_given_at_the_University_of_Rome_April_20_2007. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2023.
HJØRLAND, Birger. What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 86-101, 2008. Disponível em: https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/jaro2016/VIKBA06/um/56249939/HJORLAND__Birger._What_is_knowledge_organization__KO_.pdf. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2023.
HODGE, Gail M. Best Practices for Digital Archiving—An Information Life Cycle Approach. D-Lib Magazine, v. 6, n. 1, 2000. Disponível em: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january00/01hodge.html. Acesso em: 12 set. 2023.
LLOYD, Christopher. As Estruturas da História. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1995.
POPPER, Karl Raimund. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. 4th rev ed. New York: Basic Books, 1972.
RANGANATHAN, Shiyali Ramanrita. Prolegomena to Library Classification. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1967.
SARACEVIC, Tefko. Interdisciplinary nature of information science. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 24, n.1, p. 35-40, jan./abr. 1995. Disponível em: https://brapci.inf.br/_repositorio/2010/03/pdf_dd085d2c4b_0008887.pdf. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2023.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alejandro Caballero Rivero, Juliana Lazzarotto Freitas, Leilah Santiago Bufrem, Raimundo Nonato Macedo dos Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
