Analysis of Scientific Production in Oncology in the Scopus Database
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2024.v18.e024018Keywords:
Bibliometric Analysis, Cancer, Technetium-99m, Radiopharmaceuticals, Bibliographic Coupling, Information ManagementAbstract
According to data from the United Nations, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. Due to its chemical properties, technetium-99m remains the most used radioisotope in the diagnosis of cancers. Thus, the present work analyzed through bibliometrics the characteristics of the world scientific production on technetium-99m, presented in articles from the Scopus database between 2001 and 2021. The search terms “(99mtc OR technetium OR technetium-99m) were used. AND (cancer OR tumor)”, with the filters “Title” and “Summary” in the search fields united by the Boolean operator “OR”. Then, the data were exported so that the construction and visualization of bibliographic networks could be carried out using the VOSviewer® program. The analysis of articles and journals showed that, in the number of publications, the United States, the Journal of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute and the author Mishra, A.K. (India). Regarding the analyzes analyzed with VOSviewer®, the following stand out: the author Shuang Liu (co-citation of authors); and the words article and human (co-occurrence of keywords); Fan Wang (bibliographic coupling). It is hoped that this study will help stakeholders who have carried out research on technetium-99m radiopharmaceuticals to understand the scenario of scientific production.
Downloads
References
Avena, Magdalena José, and Barbosa, Dulce Aparecida. “Bibliometric Indicators of the Nursing Journals According to the Index Databases”. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP, vol. 51, dez. 2017, p. 1-9. SciELO, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017014603262.
Barreto, Mauricio L. “O desafio de avaliar o impacto das ciências para além da bibliometria”. Revista de Saúde Pública, vol. 47, ago.2013, p. 834–837. SciELO, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047005073.
Cutler, Cathy S., et al. “Radiometals for Combined Imaging and Therapy”. Chemical Reviews, vol. 113, no 2, fev. 2013, p. 858–883. ACS Publications, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr3003104.
Dilworth, Jonathan R., e Suzanne J. Parrott. “The Biomedical Chemistry of Technetium and Rhenium”. Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 27, no 1, janeiro de 1998, p. 43–55. pubs.rsc.org, https://doi.org/10.1039/A827043Z.
Dou, Henri, and Hassanaly, P. Technology Watch and Competitive Intelligence: A New Challenge in Education for Information. Jan. 1993. www.academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/44308667/Technology_watch_and_competitive_intelligence_a_new_challenge_in_Education_for_Information.
Egghe, Leo, and Rousseau, Ronald. “Co-Citation, Bibliographic Coupling and a Characterization of Lattice Citation Networks”. Scientometrics, vol. 55, no 3, nov. 2002, p. 349–361. Springer Link, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020458612014.
European Pharmacopoeia. 5th ed, Council of Europe, 2005, p. 578.
Ferro-Flores, Guillermina, and de Murphy, Consuelo Arteaga, and Melendez-Alafort, Laura. “Third Generation Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging and Targeted Therapy”. Current Pharmaceutical Analysis, vol. 2, no 4, out. 2006, p. 339–352.
Giménez-Espert, María Del Carmen, and Prado-Gascó, Vicente Javier. “Bibliometric Analysis of Six Nursing Journals from the Web of Science, 2012-2017”. Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 75, no 3, mar. 2019, p. 543–354. PubMed, https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13868.
Gouvêa, Alessandra Lacerda, et al. “Índice H dos pesquisadores brasileiros: um olhar comparativo entre as bases de dados WoS, Scopus e Google Scholar”. Research, Society and Development, vol. 11, no 5, março de 2022, p. e13711527832. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i5.27832.
Grácio, Maria Claudia Cabrini. “A coplamento bibliográfico e análise de cocitação: revisão teórico-conceitual”. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, vol. 21, no 47, 2016, p. 82–99.
Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini, e Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira. “Análise de cocitação de autores: um estudo teórico-metodológico dos indicadores de proximidade, aplicados ao GT7 da ANCIB │ Authors’ co-citation analysis: a theoretical- methodological study of proximity indicators applied to GT7 of ANCIB”. Liinc em Revista, vol. 9, no 1, 1, maio de 2013. revista.ibict.br, https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v9i1.527.
Guedes, Vânia L. S. “Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica”. Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação (CINFORM) –, Salvador, Bahia. 2012
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estimativa 2020 - Apresentação | INCA -. 2019, https://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa.
INCA. “Rede Câncer no 9”. INCA - Instituto Nacional de Câncer, 2009, https://www.inca.gov.br/publicacoes/revistas/rede-cancer-no-9.
Kessler, M. M. “Comparison of the Results of Bibliographic Coupling and Analytic Subject Indexing”. American Documentation, vol. 16, no. 3, 1965, p. 223–33. Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160309.
Kowalsky, Richard J., and Weatherman, Kara D. Radiopharmaceuticals in Nuclear Pharmacy and Nuclear Medicine. American Pharmacists Association, 2004.
Lucas, Elaine de Oliveira; Garcia-Zorita, Jose Carlos, and Sanz-Casado, Elias. “Evolução histórica de investigação em informetria: ponto de vista espanhol.”. Liinc em Revista, vol. 9, no. 1, maio 2013. revista.ibict.br, https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v9i1.509.
Magalhães, Jorge Lima de, et al. “Competitive Intelligence in Health: An Analysis of the Big Data for Rescuing the Neglect of the Neglected Diseases on Last Century”. World Journal of Nutrition and Health, vol. 2, no. 3, out. 2014, p. 39–47. www.sciepub.com, https://doi.org/10.12691/jnh-2-3-3.
Marques, Fabio Luiz Navarro; Okamoto, Miriam Roseli Yoshie, and Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto. “Alguns aspectos sobre geradores e radiofármacos de tecnécio-99m e seus controles de qualidade”. Radiologia Brasileira, vol. 34, ago. 2001, p. 233–239. SciELO, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000400011.
Marquesone, Rosangela. Big Data: Técnicas e Tecnologias Para Extração de Valor Dos Dados. Editora Casa do Código, 2016.
Martino, Beniamino Di, et al. “Big Data (Lost) in the Cloud”. International Journal of Big Data Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1/2, 2014, p. 3. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBDI.2014.063840.
Mesquita, Rosa, et al. “Elaboração e aplicação de instrumentos para avaliação da base de dados Scopus”. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, vol. 11, agosto de 2006, p. 187–205. SciELO, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362006000200004.
Mira, Bianca Savegnago de, et al. “Percurso editorial e a visibilidade das publicações científicas : um estudo de caso exploratório sobre o periódico Tchê Química”. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, vol. 20, abril de 2022, p. e022011–e022011. Brasil; Contemporary, periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br, https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8668225.
Moreira, Paulo Sergio da Conceição; Guimarães, André José Ribeiro, and Tsunoda, Denise Fukumi. “Qual ferramenta bibliométrica escolher? um estudo comparativo entre softwares”. P2P E INOVAÇÃO, vol. 6, mar. 2020, p. 140–158. revista.ibict.br, https://doi.org/10.21721/p2p.2020v6n2.p140-158.
NEA. The Supply of Medical Radioisotopes: 2018 Medical Isotope Demand and Capacity Projection for the 2018-2023 Period. 2018, https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_19862/the-supply-of-medical-radioisotopes-2018-medical-isotope-demand-and-capacity-projection-for-the-2018-2023-period?details=true.
NEA. The Supply of Medical Radioisotopes: Results from the Third Self-Assessment of the Global Mo-99/Tc-99m Supply Chain. 2017, https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_19826/the-supply-of-medical-radioisotopes-results-from-the-third-self-assessment-of-the-global-mo-99/tc-99m-supply-chain?details=true.
Oliveira, Ely Francina Tannuri de, e Maria Cláudia Cabrini Gracio. “Indicadores bibliométricos em ciência da informação: análise dos pesquisadores mais produtivos no tema estudos métricos na base Scopus”. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, vol. 16, dezembro de 2011, p. 16–28. SciELO, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362011000400003.
Quevedo-Silva, Filipe, et al. “Estudo Bibliométrico: Orientações sobre sua Aplicação”. ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing, vol. 15, no. 2, jun. 2016, p. 246–262. periodicos.uninove.br, https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v15i2.3274.
Quoniam, Luc, and Lucien, Arnaud. “L’intelligence économique 2.0 ?” Les Cahiers du numérique, vol. 5, no. 4, 2009, p. 11–37.
Saha, Gopal. Fundamentals of Nuclear Pharmacy. 7o ed. Springer International Publishing, 2018. www.springer.com, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57580-3.
Silva, Gilda Olinto do Valle. “Métodos quantitativos em biblioteconomia e ciência da informação”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 16, no. 1, 1987. revista.ibict.br, https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf..v16i1.281.
Soares, Patrícia Bourguignon, et al. “Análise bibliométrica da produção científica brasileira sobre Tecnologia de Construção e Edificações na base de dados Web of Science”. Ambiente Construído, vol. 16, mar. 2016, p. 175–85.
Tarapanoff, Kira. Inteligência Organizacional e Competitiva. UNB, 2006.
van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo, Waltman. VOSviewer Manual. 2022.
Zhu, Donghua, et al. “A Process for Mining Science & Technology Documents Databases, Illustrated for the Case of ‘Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining’”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 28, jan. 1999, p. 07–14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Henrique Koch Chaves, Julia Maria Brandão da Silva, Luc Quoniam, Jorge Lima de Magalhães
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.