Contributions of bibliometrics to the treatment of non-systematic institutional data of scientific production
the case of the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02146Keywords:
Bibliometric indicators, Scientific production, Case study, IFSPAbstract
According to the literature, one of the means that institutions can use for an in-depth understanding of the results, as well as the causes that enhance (or limit) them, is bibliometrics and the construction of bibliometric research indicators. However, there are few studies that illustrate, based on data from a real research institution, the benefits that bibliometrics could provide when there is no systematic approach to the treatment of data from the scientific production carried out by the institution. In this sense, the objective of this work was to illustrate the potential of bibliometric indicators in the treatment of scientific production data from a research institution that does not systematically carry out this treatment. Therefore, the method used for the case study, a case unit from the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of São Paulo (IFSP) and bibliometrics used as a technique for analyzing the information. The results present the creation and interpretation, from the raw data, of several bibliometric indicators. It is concluded that the use of bibliometrics can convert unprotected data into an understanding of the research carried out by the institution, as well as generate useful insights to expand its results.
Downloads
References
Agência FAPESP. Dezenove brasileiros integram a lista ‘Pesquisadores Altamente Citados 2020’. Agência FAPESP, 2020, https://agencia.fapesp.br/dezenove-brasileiros-integram-a-lista-pesquisadores-altamente-citados-2020/34651/. Acessado 27 dez. 2020.
Bentin, Priscila. “O Ensino de Graduação nos Institutos Federais”. As políticas públicas e o papel social dos Institutos Federais de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia. Organizado por Maylta Brandão dos Anjos e Giselle Rôças. Editora do IFRN, 2017, pp. 134-159.
Brasil. Lei nº 11.892, de 29 de dezembro de 2008. Presidência da República, 2008, http://portal.mec.gov.br/arquivos/pdf/lei_11892_ifets.pdf. Acessado 03 set. 2018.
Brasil. Guia metodológico para indicadores: orientações básicas aplicadas à metodologia do plano plurianual 2016-2019. Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão Coordenação de documentação e Informação, 2018.
Fonseca, Celso Suckow da. História do Ensino Industrial no Brasil. Senai, Departamento Nacional, Divisão de Pesquisas, Estudos e Avaliação, 1986.
Gil, Antônio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Atlas, 2010.
Glänzel, Wolfgang. Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course handouts, 2003, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.5311&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Acessado 03 abr. 2019.
Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini, et al. “As Redes de Colaboração Científica nos Rankings Universitários e a América Latina”. Repensar a universidade: desempenho acadêmico e comparações internacionais. Organizado por Jacques Markovitch. Com-Arte; FAPESP, 2018, pp. 127-145, https://metricas.usp.br/assets/docs/Miolo_Repensar_Universidade.pdf. Acessado 11 abr. 2022.
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo. Diretoria de Pesquisa. 2019, https://prp.ifsp.edu.br/diretoria-de-pesquisa. Acessado 10 mar. 2019.
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo. Resolução n° 57/2017 de 04 de julho de 2017. Reitoria, 2017.
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo. Sobre o campus. IFSP, 2018, https://ifsp.edu.br/sobre-o-campus. Acessado 02 out. 2019.
Markovitch, Jacques. “Monitoramento das métricas de desempenho acadêmico”. Repensar a universidade: desempenho acadêmico e comparações internacionais. Organizado por Jacques Markovitch. Com-Arte; FAPESP, 2018. pp. 95-109, https://metricas.usp.br/assets/docs/Miolo_Repensar_Universidade.pdf. Acessado 11 abr. 2022.
Ministério da Educação. Expansão da rede federal. 2018, http://redefederal.mec.gov.br/expansao-da-rede-federal. Acessado 23 maio 2020.
Mugnaini, Rogério, et al. “Indicadores bibliométricos da produção científica brasileira: uma análise a partir da base pascal”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 33, no. 2, 2004, pp. 123–131, http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v33n2/a13v33n2.pdf. Acessado 20 nov. 2019.
Okubo, Yoshiko. Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and examples. OCDE/GD, 1997.
Porter, Alan, e Palop, Fernando. “Mineração de textos para decisões de gestão de pesquisa e tecnologia - tech mining com a ajuda de software Vantage Point”. Anais do 3° Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria. Gramado: UFRGS, 2012, http://www.ufrgs.br/ebbc2012/arquivos/workshop-2. Acessado 20 maio 2019.
Rostaing, Hervé. La bibliométrie et sestechniques. Sciences de la Société, 1996.
Spinak, Ernesto. Dicionário enciclopédico de bibliometría, cienciometría e informetría. UNESCO CII/II, 1996.
Spinak, Ernesto. “Indicadores cienciométricos”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 27, no. 2, 1998, pp. 141-148, http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/795/826. Acessado 03 abr. 2019.
Yepes, José López. Diccionario enciclopédico de ciencias de la documentación. Síntesis, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rosangela Galdino, Leonardo Guimarães Garcia, Roniberto Morato do Amaral
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
