Hegemony and historical bloc
considerations on different interpretations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/2526-1843.2023.v8n13.p82-100Keywords:
hegemony, historical bloc, suprassingAbstract
This article aims an analysis of the concept of hegemony in Gramsci from the contributions of different authors who generated influence on the Gramscian theorization with the problematization of the interpretation of Laclau and Mouffe (2015) on the end of conflicts for hegemony when consummated the unification of the historical bloc. For the analysis, the historical matrices, meanings and modifications in the meaning of the concept are resumed, taking as a starting point the Greek coinage of the term, its resumption in the circle of Russian social democracy and, then, the crucial contribution of Lenin, the interpretations of Trotski, Rosa Luxembourg and other authors who in one way or another enriched the concept until the in-depth interpretation of Gramsci. Having structured these elements, we propose a different reading from that undertaken by Laclau and Mouffe on the self-annullation of the concept at the moment of unification of the historical bloc.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Práxis e Hegemonia Popular
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
At the time of online submission of articles, the Declaration of Responsibility and Copyright must be sent as an attached file.
The document grants publication rights to Revista Práxis e Hegemonia Popular and, in case of approval, also to carry out normative and grammatical adjustments in order to maintain the standards of the cultured language.