GEORGE SARTON E THOMAS KUHN: PARA QUE SERVE UMA HISTÓRIA DA CIÊNCIA?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1984-8900.2016.v8.n17.05.p64Keywords:
História da ciência, Filosofia da ciência, George Sarton, Thomas KuhnAbstract
Na evolução da História da Ciência, muitos têm sido os esforços para especificar a finalidade dessa área do conhecimento. Ainda antes da constituição de uma disciplina autônoma, o que só viria a ocorrer na década de 50, diversos estudiosos se empenharam em prol da promoção dos estudos históricos do desenvolvimento científico, uma promoção que continua invariavelmente em escritos posteriores. Neste trabalho, discutimos as perspectivas de George Sarton (1884-1956) e Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996), buscando mostrar como, ao mesmo tempo em que discutem algumas justificativas em prol dos estudos históricos sobre a ciência, eles destacam o caráter inovador de suas propostas de trabalho. Ainda que vistas hoje como muito divergentes, essas propostas exibem alguns traços confluentes que desempenharam um papel significativo na discussão em defesa desse campo de estudos.
Downloads
References
BARNES, E. Review of The Life of Science: Essays in the History of Civilization. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 263, p. 230-231, maio 1949.
BENITEZ, R. S.; MARIN, F. G. Presentación. In: BENITEZ, Roberto S.; MARIN, Francisco G. (Coord.). La aventura del pensamiento científico moderno.Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba, 2002.
BERNARD COHEN, I. History and the Philosopher of Science. In: SUPPE, Frederick. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.
BURIAN, R. More than a Marriage of Convenience: On the Inextricability of History and Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science, 44, p.1-42, 1977.
BUTERFIELD, H. The first volume of a great new work about the place of science in history. Review of A History of Science: Ancient Science through the Golden Age of Greece.Scientific American, p. 95-98, 1953.
______. The Origins of Modern Science 1300-1800. New York: The Free Press, 1966.
CLAGETT, M. (Org.) Critical Problems in the History of Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.
CLARK, J. The Philosophy of Science and the History of Science. In: CLAGETT, M. (ed.), p. 103-140, 1969.
CROMBIE, A. C. Review of The Appreciation of Ancient and Medieval Science during the Renaissance (1450-1600) e Six Wings. Men of Science in the Renaissance. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. Nº 38, p.164-165, 1959.
DUHEM, P. M.M. La théorie physique, son objet, sa structure. Paris: Vrin, 1989.
GIERE, R. History and Philosophy of Science: Intimate Relationship or Marriage of Convenience? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24, p. 282-297, 1973.
HALL, M. B. Review of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The American Historical Review. Vol. 68, No. 3, p. 700-701, 1963.
KRAGH, H. The historiography of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
KOYRÉ, A. Études Galiléennes. Paris: Hermann, 1966.
LAKATOS, I. History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, p. 91-136, 1970.
KUHN, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
______. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.
______. The Road since Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
MERTON, R. K. Recollections & Reflections. In: SARTON, George, 1988.
MILLÁS VALLICROSA, J. M. George Sarton y la Historia de la Ciencia Oriental. Isis, v. 48, nº 3, p. 315-319, set. 1957.
NICKLES, T. Philosophy of Science and History of Science. Osiris, v. 10, Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science, p. 138-163, 1995.
OLIVEIRA, A. J.A obra científica de Leonardo da Vinci: controvérsias na historiografia da ciência. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, v. 39, n. 2, p. 53-86, 2016.
PINTO DE OLIVEIRA, J. C.; OLIVEIRA, A. J. Kuhn, Sarton, and the history of science. In: PISANO, R. et al. (Ed.). Hypotheses and perspectives within history and philosophy of science. Hommage to Alexandre Koyré, 1964-2014. Dordrecht: Springer (no prelo).
PRESTON, J. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: A Reader´s Guide. London: Continuum, 2008.
ROLLER, D. A. D. A História da ciência e seu estudo nos Estados Unidos. In: ROLLER, D.A.D. et al. Iniciação à história da ciência. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1966.
RUPERT HALL, A. Can the History of Science Be History? The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 4, Nº. 3, p. 207-220, 1969.
SARTON, G. Une encyclopédie léonardesque. Raccolta Vinciana. 10, p. 235-242, 1919.
______. Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Science (Preliminary Note). Isis, v. 4, nº 1, p. 23-31, 1921.
______. Introduction to the History of Science. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, v. I, 1927.
______. The Life of Science. New York: Henry Schuman, 1948.
______. The Study of the History of Science. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1957.
______. A History of Science: Ancient Science through the Golden Age of Greece. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.
______. Acta Atque Agenda. In: SARTON, George. On the History of Science: Essays. Selected and edited by Dorothy Stimson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962a.
______. A Summing Up. In: SARTON, George. On the History of Science: Essays. Selected and edited by Dorothy Stimson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962b.
______. History of Science. In: SARTON, George. On the History of Science: Essays. Selected and edited by Dorothy Stimson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962c.
______. Introduction to the History of Science. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, v. III 1975.
______. The History of Science and the New Humanism. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 1988.
SHEA, W. Why Historians of Science and Philosophers of Science should speak one another. Anais do Simpósio História e Filosofia da Ciência. ACIESP, nº 23, 1979.
SINGER, D.; SINGER, C. George Sarton and the History of Science. Isis, v. 48, no. 3, p. 306-310, set. 1957.
STIMSON, D. Preface. In: SARTON, 1962.
SUPPE, F. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Kínesis - Revista de Estudos dos Pós-Graduandos em Filosofia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
