Guia para redação científica: como evitar erros comuns em um artigo científico

Autores

  • Erika Aparecida Silveira a Federal University of Goias, School of Medicine. Graduate Program in Health Sciences. Rua 235, s/n - Setor Leste Universitário, CEP: 74605-050, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. b University College London, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, United Kingdom;
  • Amanda Maria de Sousa Romeiro c State University of Goias, Itumbiara University Unit. Avenida Modesto de Carvalho, Distrito Agro Industrial, CEP: 75536-100; Itumbiara, Goias, Brazil;
  • Matias Noll a Federal University of Goias, School of Medicine. Graduate Program in Health Sciences. Rua 235, s/n - Setor Leste Universitário, CEP: 74605-050, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; d Goiano Federal Institute, Ceres Campus. Rodovia Go-154, Km 03, s/n, CEP: 76300-000, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v32.13791

Palavras-chave:

Publicação, comunicação científica, alfabetização científica, habilidades científicas, escrita científica

Resumo

A escrita científica é um processo que exige dedicação, conhecimento e habilidades de diferentes áreas científicas. No entanto, os autores, principalmente os jovens que iniciam a pós-graduação e a carreira científica, estão propensos a cometerem alguns erros ao escrever e que muitas vezes pode passar despercebido. Neste sentido, este estudo objetiva descrever erros comuns na redação científica e técnicas de como evitá-los. Erros podem ocorrer no processo de escrita antes e durante o ato de escrever, pois muitos autores não estão familiarizados com a escrita científica ou pulam etapas importantes a que deveriam ser consideradas anteriormente. Para preparar o manuscrito é essencial que os autores dominem a temática do estudo e que os resultados da pesquisa sejam suportados pela literatura científica. Durante a redação, muitas vezes o autor faz uso equivocado dos itens necessários em cada seção do artigo, perdendo o sentido lógico dos resultados da pesquisa e dificultando a leitura do texto. Antes de iniciar o processo de redação, é necessário, portanto, planejar cada parágrafo e utilizar técnicas textuais que garantam coesão e coerência entre os parágrafos. Assim, este estudo descreve os principais erros no processo de redação de artigos científicos, visando aprimorar técnicas, otimizando o tempo dos pesquisadores para desenvolver um texto adequado, claro e elegante.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Hotaling S. Simple rules for concise scientific writing. Limnol Oceanogr Lett 2020; 5: 379–83.

Geithner CA, Pollastro AN. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills. Adv Physiol Educ 2016; 40: 38–46.

Asnake M. The importance of scientific publication in the development of public health. Cien Saude Colet 2015; 20: 1972–3.

Forero DA, Trujillo ML, González-Giraldo Y, Barreto GE. Scientific Productivity in Neurosciences in Latin America: A Scientometrics Perspective. International Journal of Neuroscience 2019; 130: 398–406.

E. Valenti V, Patricio da Silva A. The effect of negationism on public health. Journal of Human Growth and Development 2021; 31: 189–91.

Castanha C, Fernando Barbosa Tavarez L, Leone C, et al. Basic life support education: the impact of lecture-demonstration in undergraduate students of health sciences. Journal of Human Growth and Development 2021; 31: 283–90.

Silva RC. Postgraduate expansion in Brazil and Umesp’s Masters Program within such context. Educação & Linguagem 2009; 12: 294–305.

Filho JN da S. Volume de publicações científicas sobre Educação Ambiental na base SciELO Brasil: um estudo de cienciometria. Revbea 2019; 14: 207–21.

Grupo Web of Science. A Pesquisa no Brasil: Promovendo a excelência. 2019: 1–49.

OCTI BA. Panorama da ciência brasileira: 2015-2020. 2021; 196.

Deheinzelin D, Carameli B. Produção científica, pós-graduação e a RAMB. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2007; 53: 471–2.

Pati D, Lorusso LN. How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Environments Research and Design Journal 2018; 11: 15–30.

Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet 2007; 370: 1453–7.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Online) 2015; 349. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Zadeh-Vakili A, Hosseinpanah F, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Materials and Methods. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2019; 17: 1–9.

Bahadoran Z, Jeddi S, Mirmiran P, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Introduction. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2018; 16. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.84795

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Title. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2019; 17. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.98326

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Results. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2019; 17: e92113.

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Abstract and keywords. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2020; 18: 4–10.

Iskander JK, Wolicki SB, Leeb RT, Siegel PZ. Successful Scientific Writing and Publishing: A Step-by-Step Approach. Prev Chronic Dis 2018; 15: E79.

Hotaling S. Simple rules for concise scientific writing. Limnol Oceanogr Lett 2020; 5: 379–83.

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (Online) 2010; 340: 698–702.

Gagnier JJ, Riley D, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Kienle GS. Die Case Reporting (CARE) Guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110: 603–8.

du Sert NP, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, et al. The arrive guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2020; 18: 9–10.

O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine 2014; 89: 1245–51.

Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet 2007; 370: 1453–7.

Kallestinova ED. How to Write Your First Research Paper. YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2011; 84: 181–90.

Derish PA, Maa J, Ascher NL, Harris HW. Enhancing the Mission of Academic Surgery by Promoting Scientific Writing Skills. Journal of Surgical Research 2007; 140: 177–83.

Weinstein R. How to write a manuscript for peer review. J Clin Apher 2020; 35: 358–66.

Gagnier JJ, Riley D, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Kienle GS. Die Case Reporting (CARE) Guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110: 603–8.

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (Online) 2010; 340: 698–702.

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Zadeh-Vakili A, Hosseinpanah F, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Materials and Methods. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2019; 17: 1–9.

Weinstein R. How to write a manuscript for peer review. J Clin Apher 2020; 35: 358–66.

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Results. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2019; 17: e92113.

Bahadoran Z, Jeddi S, Mirmiran P, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Introduction. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2018; 16. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.84795

Sanganyado E. How to write an honest but effective abstract for scientific papers. Sci Afr 2019; 6: e00170.

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Abstract and keywords. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2020; 18: 4–10.

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Title. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2019; 17. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.98326

Cardoso CK de S, Santos AS e A de C, Rosa LP de S, et al. Effect of Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Traditional Brazilian Diet on the Bone Health Parameters of Severely Obese Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2020; 12: 403.

Silveira EA, Kliemann N, Noll M, Sarrafzadegan N, Oliveira C. Visceral obesity and incident cancer and cardiovascular disease: An integrative review of the epidemiological evidence. Obesity Reviews 2020: obr.13088.

Fernandes MA, Vieira FER, Silva JS e, Avelino FVSD, Santos JDM. Prevalence of anxious and depressive symptoms in college students of a public institution. Revi Bras Enferm 2018; 71: 2298–304.

Silva RM da, Mangas RM do N, Figueiredo AEB, et al. The influence of family problems and conflicts on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in elderly people. Cien Saude Colet 2015; 20: 1703–10.

Adraskela K, Veisaki E, Koutsilieris M, Philippou A. Physical Exercise Positively Influences the Breast Cancer Evolution. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17: 408–17.

Edalati S, Bagherzadeh F, Jafarabadi MA, Ebrahimi-mamaghani M. Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents. British Journal of Nutrition 2021; 125: 568–76.

Habibzadeh F, Yadollahie M. Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? Cross-sectional study of 22 scientific journals. Croat Med J 2010; 51: 165–70.

Silveira EA, Souza JD de, Santos AS e A de C, Canheta AB de S, Pagotto V, Noll M. What are the factors associated with sarcopenia-related variables in adult women with severe obesity? Archives of Public Health 2020; 78: 71.

Rodrigues LP, Rezende ATDO, Moura L de AN e, et al. What is the impact of multimorbidity on the risk of hospitalisation in older adults? A systematic review study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11: 1–6.

Publicado

2022-10-31

Edição

Seção

ORIGINAL ARTICLES