Terminological studies as domain analysis
a critical exploration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02140Palavras-chave:
Knowledge organization, Terminology, Domain analysis, Terminological studiesResumo
This paper aims to thoroughly analyze terminological studies as a particular modality of domain analysis (DA). To this end, we establish the following methodological sequence: i) a broad description of the field of terminology, with emphasis on a general characterization of the theoretical currents and the two traditional types of research: systematic research and punctual research; ii) review of the background information on the theoretical and methodological intersection between terminology and knowledge organization (KO); iii) the problematization of terminological studies seen as DA, based on the study of background information and a series of trigger questions. The answers to these questions will allow us to progress in their understanding. The results show the need to further define the profile of terminological studies to use them in KO better. They also suggest considering terminological studies as a separate DA category, specifically in relation to language for special purposes (LSP) and discourse analysis. Finally, the preliminary conclusions will guide future research in the field. In particular, we stress that terminological research methods seem not to be sufficiently recognized as suitable for application in KO.
Downloads
Métricas
Referências
Albrechtsen, Hanne. “Subject analysis and indexing: from automated indexing to domain analysis”. The Indexer, vol. 18, no. 4, 1993, pp. 221-224.
Alexiev, Boyan, and Marksbury, Nancy. “Terminology as organized knowledge”. Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization, vol. 12, 2010, pp 363-370.
Alexiev Boyan. “Terminology structuring for learner’s glossaries”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 33, no. 2, 2006, pp. 96-118.
Almeida, Bruno. “Terminologia e organização do conhecimento: linguagens, vocabulários e sistemas”. Linha D’Água, São Paulo, vol. 34, no. 2, mai./ago. 2021, pp. 26-46.
Almeida, Josiana Florêncio Vieira Régis de, and Dias, Guilherme Ataíde. “Estado da arte sobre análise de domínio no campo da Ciência da Informação brasileira”. Brazilian Journal of Information Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, 2019, pp. 26-45.
Barros, Thiago Henrique Bragato, and Moraes, João Batista Ernesto de. “From archives to archival science: elements for a discursive construction”. Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge Organization, vol. 12, 2010, pp. 398–404.
Barité, Mario. “Los árboles de dominio”. Teoría y praxis en terminología. Coordinated by Sara Álvarez Catalá and Mario Barité. CSIC, 2017, pp. 91-102.
Beghtol, Clare. “Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, 1995, pp 30-44.
Benítez, Pamela Faber. “The cognitive shift in terminology and specializad translation”. MonTI, Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación, no. 1, 2009, pp. 107-134. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=265119728010. Accessed 10 set. 2021.
Bevilacqua, Cleci. “Investigación sistemática en terminología”. Teoría y praxis en terminología. Coordinated by Sara Álvarez Catalá and Mario Barité. CSIC, 2017, pp. 69-90.
Braz, Márcia Ivo. Panorama das contribuições da Terminologia para a Organização do Conhecimento: uma análise das teses e dissertações no Brasil a partir da Teoria da Complexidade, 2020. Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Tese de Doutorado.
British Standard Institute. Structured Vocabularies for Infor-mation retrieval: Guide: BS 8723-1. BSI, 2005.
Cabré, María Teresa. “Theories of terminology: Their description, prescription and explanation”. Terminology, vol. 9, no. 2, dec. 2003, pp. 163–199.
Cabré, María Teresa. La terminología: Teoría, metodología, aplicaciones. Empúries, 1993.
Cabré, María Teresa, and Tebé, Carles. “El trabajo terminológico multilingüe de enriquecimiento linguístico: una propuesta metodológica”. Revista española de linguística aplicada, vol. monográfico, no. 1, 2005, pp. 19-41.
Campbell, D.Grant. “The human life as warrant: a facet analysis of protocols for dealing with responsive behaviors in dementia patients”. Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects. Edited by Wieslaw Babik. Ergon-Verlag, 2014, pp. 121–128.
Campos, Maria Luiza de Almeida. Linguagem documentária: Teorias que fundamentam sua elaboração. EdUFF, 2001.
Célestin, Tina, et al. Méthodologie de la recherche terminologique ponctualle. Office de la Langue Française, 1984.
Christensen, Ben. “Minoritization vs. universalization: lesbianism and male homosexuality in LCSH and LCC”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 35, no. 4, 2008, pp. 229–238.
Corbeil, Jean-Claude. Guide de travail em terminologie. Government du Québec, 1973.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. “Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 26, no. 4, 1999, pp. 192-201.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. “Editorial: Why Knowledge Organization? The reasons for IC’s change of name”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 1, no. 1, 1993, pp. 1.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. “Knowledge organization and terminology: philosophical and linguistic bases”. International Classification, vol. 19, no. 2, 1992, pp. 65-71.
Dubuc, Robert. Manual de terminología. Unión Latina, 1999.
Dutta, Bidyarthi, et al. “Study of subject domain by keyword cluster analysis based on research articles: a case study from physics”. Information Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, 2011, pp. 195–210.
Encyclopedia Britannica. Merriam-Webster Inc., 2021, https://www.merriam-webster.com/. Accessed 10 set. 2021.
Espelt, Constanza. “Bases teóricas en la enseñanza de los lenguajes documentales”. Actas del I Encuentro de ISKO: España, ISKO, vol. 1, 1995, pp. 125-134.
Felber, Helmut. “An outline of international terminological activities”. International Classification, vol. 1, no. 2, 1974, pp. 89-91.
Gaudin, F. Pour une socioterminologie: Des problèmmes semantiques aux pratiques institutionelles. Université de Rouen, 1993.
Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves. "Análise de domínio como perspectiva metodológica em organização da informação". Ciência da Informação, vol. 43, no. 1, 2014, pp.13-21, http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1415. Accessed 10 set. 2021.
Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves, et al. “The conceptual dimensión of knowledge organization in the ISKO proceedings domain: a Bardinian content analysis”. Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historical Patterns and Future Prospects. Edited by Wieslaw Babik. Ergon-Verlag, 2014, pp. 101–106.
Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves, and Tognoli, Natália Bolfarini. “Provenance as a domain analysis approach in archival knowledge organization”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 42, no. 8, 2015, pp. 562-569.
Hjørland, Birger. “Domain analysis”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 44, no. 6, 2017, pp. 436-464.
Hjørland, Birger. “Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative”. Journal of documentation, vol. 58, no. 4, 2002, pp. 422–462.
Hjørland, Birger, and Albrechtsen, Hanne. “Toward a new horizon in Information Science: domain analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, no. 6, 1995, pp. 400-425.
International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 25.964-1: Information and Documentation: Thesauri and Interoperability with other Vocabularies. ISO, 2011.
International Society for Knowledge Organization. “Knowledge organization at the interface”. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference: Aalborg, Ergon Verlag, 2020.
Jeong, Senator, and Kim, Hong-Gee. “Intellectual structure of biomedical informatics reflected in scholarly events”. Scientometrics, vol. 85, no. 2, 2010, pp. 541–551.
Krieger, Maria da Graça, and Finatto, Maria José Bocorny. Introdução à terminología: teoría e prática. Contexto, 2004.
Kwaśnik, Barbara.H., and Flaherty, Marie Grace. “Harmonizing profeesional and non-professional classifications for enhanced knowledge representation”. Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge Organization. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzochi. Ergon Verlag, 2010, pp 229–235.
L’Homme, Marie-Claude. La terminologie: príncipes et techniques. Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2004, https://books.openedition.org/pum/10693. Accessed 10 set. 2021.
Lin, Xia, Aluker, et al. “Dynamic concept representation through a visual concept explorer”. Knowledge Organization and the Global Learning Society. Edited by Gerhard Budin, Christian Swertz, and Konstantin Mitgutsch. Ergon Verlag, 2006, pp. 367–374.
López-Huertas, María José, et al. “Terminological representation of specialized areas in conceptual structures: the case of gender studies”. Knowledge Organization and the Global Information Society. Edited by C. Mcllwaine. Ergon Verlag, 2004, pp. 35-39.
Mayr, Philipp, and Petras, Vivien. “Terminology for information retrieval: effectiveness of cross-concordances”. GESIS Social Science Information Centre, 2008.
Miller, Steven J., et al. “Great expectations: professionals’ perception and knowledge organization curricula”. Knowledge Organization for a Global Learning Society. Edited by Gerhard Budin, Christian Swertz and Konstantin Mitgutsch. Ergon Verlag, 2006, pp. 349–358.
Moliner, María. Diccionario de uso del español. 4th ed. Gredós, 2016.
National Information Standards Organization. Guidelines for the Construction, Format and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies: An American National Standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005(R2010). NISO Press, 2005, http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/12591/z39-19-2005r2010.pdf. Accessed 10 set. 2021.
Pattuelli, Cristina, and Rubinow, Sara. “The knowledge organization of DBpedia: a case study”. Journal of Documentation, vol. 69, no. 6, 2013, pp.762–772.
Robinson, L. “Information science: communication chain and domain analysis”. Journal of Documentation, vol. 65, no 4, 2009, pp. 578–591.
Sager, Juan Carlos. A practical course in terminology processing. John Benjamin Publishing Company, 1990.
Scaturro, Irene. “Faceted taxonomies for the performing arts domain: the case of the European collected library of artistic performance”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 40, no. 3, 2013, pp. 205–211.
Senftleben, Gustavo Filsinger. “Evolución diacrónica de la terminología y disciplinas en contacto”. Tonos digital: Revista de estudios filológicos, no. 39, 2020, pp. 1-25.
Smiraglia, Richard P. Domain analysis for Knowledge Organization: Tools for ontology extraction. Chandos Publishing, 2015.
Smiraglia, Richard P. “Epistemology of Domain Analysis.” Cultural Frames of Knowledge, Edited by Richard P. Smiraglia and Hur-Li Lee. Ergon Verlag, 2012, pp. 111-124.
Temmerman, Rita. Towards new ways of terminology description: The sociocognitive approach. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000.
Tennis, Joseph T. “Two axes of domains for domain analysis”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 30, no. 3/4, 2003, pp. 191-195.
Woźniak-Kasperek, Jadwiga. “Terminology as a picture of Knowledge Organization in a scientific discipline”. Knowledge Organization in the 21st Century: Between Historial Patterns and Future Prospects. Edited by Wieslaw Babik. Ergon-Verlag, 2014, pp. 305-311.
Wüster, Eugen. Internationale Sprachnormung in der Technik, besonders in der Electrotechnik. Bouvier, 1970.
Zherebchevsky, Sergei. “Formalism in knowledge organization: thematic analysis of ISKO 10 proceedings”. Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzochi. 2010, pp. 98-105.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Barité; Mirtha Rauch
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ao submeter um artigo os autores mantêm os direitos autorais do mesmo, cedendo ao Brazilian Journal of Information Science plenos direitos para publicação do referido texto.
O (s) autor (es) concorda(m) que o artigo, se aceito editorialmente para publicação, deve ser licenciado sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa /4.0) Os leitores / usuários são livres para: - Compartilhar - copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato - Adaptar - remixar, transformar e desenvolver o material para qualquer finalidade, mesmo comercialmente. O licenciante não pode revogar essas liberdades desde que você siga os termos da licença. Sob os seguintes termos: - Atribuição - Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se foram feitas alterações. Você pode fazê-lo de qualquer maneira razoável, mas não de maneira que sugira que o licenciante endossa você ou seu uso. - ShareAlike - Se você remixar, transformar ou desenvolver o material, deverá distribuir suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original. Sem restrições adicionais - Você não pode aplicar termos legais ou medidas tecnológicas que restrinjam legalmente outras pessoas a fazer o que a licença permitir. Avisos: - Você não precisa cumprir a licença para elementos do material em domínio público ou nos casos em que seu uso é permitido por uma exceção ou limitação aplicável. - Não há garantias. A licença pode não fornecer todas as permissões necessárias para o uso pretendido. Por exemplo, outros direitos, como publicidade, privacidade ou direitos morais, podem limitar a maneira como você usa o material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
