A Computer model of information behavior to study information security professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2018.v12n4.04.p22Palabras clave:
Information behavior, ontologies, artificial intelligence, machine learning, predictive models, psychology, cognitive scienceResumen
In this paper, we propose a computer model of information behavior to study information security professionals and an architecture, which mimics the way our brain learns new concepts to simulate this behavior computationally. Used to represent and describe any domain of knowledge, we may use ontologies to study the human information behavior and show some of the concepts and relation-ships involved in this field of knowledge. A deep knowledge of the core concepts underpinning this field can provide us with a solid basis for constructing a model. We can also use computer-programming tools not only to capture the ideas that make up this field of knowledge, but can also simulate the human information behavior. The use of computers also allows us to crawl data over the Internet and process large amounts of them in order to find patterns with some specific characteristics. In the paper, we also present the current state of this research and challenges of the model.
Descargas
Referencias
Antoniou, G.; Harmelen, F. V. (2012). A semantic web primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
Alpayd?n, E. (2014). Introduction to machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
Ausubel, D. P. (2011). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
Bates, M. (2005). An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. // Fische, K.; Erdelez, S.; Mckechnie, L. (Orgs.). Theo-ries of information behavior. Medford: Information Today, 1-24.
Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. // Canadian Journal of Information Science 5 (1980) 133-143.
Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information and information systems. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers, 1991.
Byström, K., Ja?rvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects infor-mation seeking and use. // Information Processing and Manage-ment 31(1995) 191-213.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000). Web work: Information seeking and knowledge work on the World Wide Web. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2000.
Choo, C. W. (2006). The Knowing organization: how organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods and results to date. //International Communications Association Annual Meeting. Dallas, Texas, USA, 1993.
Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral approach to information retrieval system design. // Journal of Documentation 45:3(1989) 171-212.
Gas?evic?, D., Djuric?, D.;Devedz?ic?, V. (2009). Model driven engineering and ontology development. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
Gruber, T. R. (1993). A Translation Approach to Portable Ontolo-gies. Knowledge Acquisition 5:2(1993)199–220.
Kelleher, J. D.; Namee, B. M.; D'Arcy, A. (2015). Fundamentals of machine learning for predictive data analytics: algorithms, worked examples, and case studies. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2015.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Abex Publishing, 1993.
Leckie, G. J.;Pettigrew, K. E.;Sylvain, C. (1996). Modelling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers.//The Library Quarterly 66:2 (1996) 161-193.
Leckie, G. J. (2005). General model of the information seeking of professionals. //Fisher, K. E.; Erdelez,S.;McKechnie, L. E. F. (Eds.). Theories of information behavior. Medford, N.J.: Published for the American Society for Information Science and Technology by Information Today, 2005.158-163.
Leung, H. (2011). Service intelligence and service science: evolutionary technologies and challenges. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2011.
Maedeche, A. D. (2002). Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
McCue, C. (2015). Data Mining and Predictive Analysis: Intelligence Gathering and Crime Analysis. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, 2015.
Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: CPP, 1980.
Müller, A. C., & Guido, S. (2017). Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: A guide for data scientists. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2017.
Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Pittsburgh, PA: Design Research Center, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1982.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Raschka, S. (2015). Python Machine Learning. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Limited, 2015.
Russel, M. A. (2014). Mining the social web: data mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google, Github, and more. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly, 2014.
Statista (2018). Number of social media users worldwide from 2010 to 2021.https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries. // College & Research Libraries 29:3 (1968) 178-194.
Taylor, R. S. (1996). Information use environments. //E. Auster & C. W. Choo (Eds.), Managing Information for the competitive edge. New York: Neal-Schuman, 1996. 93-135.UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs –Population Division (2017). World Population.http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/
Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. // Journal of documentation 37:1 (1981) 658-670.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behavior research. // Journal of documentation 55:3 (1999) 249-270.
Zipf, G. K. (1965). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. Hafner Publishing Company: New York & London, 1965.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Paulo Hideo Ohtoshi, Cláudio Gottschalg Duque
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Al someter un artículo, los autores conservan los derechos de autor del artículo, otorgando todos los derechos para el Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends para publicar el texto.
El(los) autor(es) acuerdan que el artículo, si se acepta editorialmente para su publicación, tendrá licencia bajo Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa /4.0).
Los lectores/usuarios son libres para:
- Compartir - copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
- Adaptar - remezclar, transformar y construir sobre el material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades mientras siga los términos de la licencia. Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución: debe otorgar el crédito apropiado, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Puede hacerlo de manera razonable, pero de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda en su uso.
Compartir igual: si remezcla, transforma o desarrolla el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
Sin restricciones adicionales: no puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros de hacer cualquier cosa que la licencia permita.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
- No se otorgan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para su uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como publicidad, privacidad o derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que usa el material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
