The scholarly communication on the move
from the origins to the current issues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2021.v15.e02103Keywords:
Scholarly communication system, Scholarly periodical, Scholarly article, Open access, Predatory journalsAbstract
Describes the historical narrative of the scholarly communication system, starting from the conception of the first research sharing activities to the current debates of this system, which have led to new forms of communication and the appearance of new conjunctures, and contextualizes the actors involved in the system. As methodology, this exploratory research is based on a survey of literature specialized in the domain, based on the assumption that since the 17th-century scientific communication has experienced transformations associated with the historical, social, economic, and political phenomena inherent to each period of history. As conclusions, it highlights the urge for the research developed in the Academia to be aligned with the current needs of society, and the establishment of a more effective communication between the Academia and society through scientific divulgation.
Downloads
References
About Philosophical Transactions. The Royal Society, 2019, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstl/about. Acessado em 05 jan. 2020.
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., and Huff, A. S. “Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies”. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 19, 2017, pp. 432-454. Acessado 20 dez. 2020.
Bolaño, C. Indústria Cultural: Informação e Capitalismo. Hucitec/Polis, 2000.
Bolaño, C. R. S., Kobashi, N., and Santos, R. N. M. dos. “A lógica econômica da edição científica certificada”. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 2006, pp. 119-131. Acessado 04 abr. 2019.
Bourdieu, P. Lições da aula. Ática, 1994.
Budapest Open Access Initiative. Budapest Open Access Initiative, 2002, https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-translations/portuguese-brazilian-translation. Acessado 08 nov. 2020
Bufrem, L. S., and Garcia, T. M. “A editora universitária e o compromisso da universidade com as práticas de divulgação do conhecimento produzido”. Em Questão, vol. 20, no. 1, 2014. Acessado 20 abr. 2019
Capes. Avaliação Multidimensional, 2019. Disponível em: https://www1.capes.gov.br/36-noticias/9979-avaliacao-medira-impacto-social-e-insercao-regional-das-pesquisas. Acessado em: 2 jan. 2021
Carpenter, Maria, et al. "Envisioning the Library's Role in Scholarly Communication in the Year 2025." portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 11 no. 2, 2011, p. 659-681. Acessado em: 2 jan. 2021
Das, A. K. Scholarly communication. Unesco, 2015.
Data paper instructions. Ecological Society of America, 2020, https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/19399170/resources/data_paper_inst_ecy. Acessado em: 05 set. 2020
Eriksson, S., and Helgesson, G. “The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics”. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 20, 2017, pp. 163-170. Acessado em: 10 set. 2020
Freitas, M. H. “Considerações acerca dos primeiros periódicos científicos brasileiros”. Ci. Inf., vol. 35, no. 3, 2006, pp. 54–66. Acessado em: 05 abr. 2020
Garfield, E. “What do we know About fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2. Why Does Fraud Happen and What Are Its Effects?”. Current Contents, vol. 10, 1987, pp. 93–100. Acessado em: 15 abr. 2020
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., Mäntylä, M. V. “Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering”. Information and Software Technology, vol. 106, 2019, p. 101-121. Acessado em: 20 dez. 2020
Garvey, W. D. Communication, the essence of science: facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers, and students. Pergamon Press, 1979.
González de Gómez, M. N. G., and Machado, R. R. “A ciência invisível: o papel dos relatórios e as questões de acesso à informação científica”. DataGramaZero, vol. 8, no. 5, 2007. Acessado em: 20 dez. 2020
Guedón, J. C. “Sustaining the ‘Great Conversation’: The future of scholarly and scientific journals”. The future of the academic journal. Edited by B. Cope, and A. Phillips. Chandos Publishing, 2014. pp. 85-112.
Hassan-Montero, Y., Guerrero-Bote, V., and Moya-Anegón, F. “Graphical interface of the SCImago Journal and Country rank: an interactive approach to accessing bibliometric information”. El profesional de la información, vol. 23, no. 3, 2014, pp. 272-278. Acessado em: 20 dez. 2020
Houghton, B. Scientific Periodicals: Their Historical Development, Characteristics, and Control, Bradford. Bingley, 1975.
Hurd, J. M. “The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 60, no. 8, 2009, pp. 1635-1651.
Institute. Institute for scientific information, 2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Scientific_Information#:~:text=The%20Institute%20for%20Scientific%20Information,a%20field%20pioneered%20by%20Garfield. Acessado em 29 jun 2020.
Journal, 2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_des_s%C3%A7avans. Acessado em 30 mar 2020
Kent, A., and H. Lancour. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, v.48, Supplement II. M. Dekker, 1968–2003.
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., and Mongeon, P. “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era”. PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6: e0127502, 2015. Acessado em: 10 abr. 2019
Mabe, M. “Does journal publishing have a future?” Academic and Professional Publishing. Edited by Campbell, R, Pentz, E, and Borthwick, I. Chandos Publishing, 2015.
Martins, H. C. Open Science: os caminhos da produção científica aberta no Brasil. SciELO em Perspectiva: Humanas, 2020, https://humanas.blog.scielo.org/blog/2020/02/06/open-science-os-caminhos-da-producao-cientifica-aberta-no-brasil/. Acessado em 15 mar. 2020
Meadows, A. J. A comunicação científica. Briquet de Lemos, 1999.
Merton, R. K. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science”. American Sociological Review, vol. 22, no. 6, 1957. Acessado em: 10 dez. 2019
Merton, R. K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Mueller, S. P. M., and Caribé, R. C. V. “A comunicação científica para o público leigo: breve histórico”. Informação & Informação, vol. 15, n. 1, 2010, pp. 13-30.
Mueller, S. P. M. “A comunicação científica e o movimento de acesso livre ao conhecimento”. Ci. Inf., vol. 35, no. 2, 2006, pp. 27–38.
O’Donnell, M. Understanding Predatory Publishers, 2019, https://instr.iastate.libguides.com/predatory. Acessado em 06 mar. 2019
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Karen Santos-d'Amorim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
