Innovation models
bibliometric analysis of scientific production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2021.v15.e02106Keywords:
Innovation models, Bibliometrics, Scopus, Scientific productionAbstract
The present study aimed to identify the number of publications, authors and most productive institutions, most cited documents, journals that publish the most on the topic, and keywords most used in scientific articles that deal with innovation models. The study was carried out in 1,538 articles retrieved from the Scopus database based on the search for the term “innovation models” in the title, abstract and keywords fields, without any time frame. The results show that there is a growing trend in the number of publications on this topic, having identified Zi-Li Deng as the author with the greatest impact. In addition, the article “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms”, by Laursen, K and Salter, A, emerged as the most cited among the identified documents. Among the journals, Technological Forecasting and Social Change magazine presented the largest number of articles on the topic. The United States shows itself to be the country with the largest share in the number of articles and Delft University of Technology, located in the Netherlands, is the most productive institution. As for keywords, the terms management, innovation adoption and strategy were those with the highest semantic content. The use of bibliometric techniques proved to be adequate to identify the essential characteristics of scientific production on models of innovation. The study can be adopted as a decision-making tool for researchers, since it provides the main journals, authors and indexing terms on models of innovation.
Downloads
References
Acar, A Zafer, and Ozsahin, Mehtap. “The relationship among strategic orientations, organizational innovativeness, and business performance.” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 22, no.1, 2018, pp. 1-27, doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500093. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Andres, Ana. Measuring academic research: how to undertake a bibliometric study. Chandos Publishing, 2009.
Anning-Dorson, Thomas. “Organisational culture and leadership as mediators of service innovation and firm competitiveness: a study of an emerging economy.” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 20, no.7, 2016, pp. 1-29, doi.org/10.1142/S136391961650064X. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Araújo, Carlos Alberto. “Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais.” Em Questão, vol. 12, no. 1, 2006, pp. 11-32, seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/article/view/16. Acessado 9 set. 2020.
Aria, Massimo, and Cuccurullo, Corrado. “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, 2017, pp. 959-975, doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007. Acessado 8 set. 2020.
Barbieri, José Carlosa, and Álvares, Antonio Carlos Teixeira. “Sixth generation innovation model: description of a success model.” Innovation & Management Review, vol. 13, no.2, 2016, pp. 88- 112, revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/102515. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Baskaran, Shruthi, and Mehta, Khanjan. “What is innovation anyway? Youth perspectives from resource- constrained environments.” Technovation, vol. 52-53, 2016, pp. 4-17. doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.005. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Berkhout, Augustinus J, et al. “Innovating the innovation process.” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 34, no. 3-4, 2006, pp. 390-404, doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2006.009466. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Bezerra, Cicero Aparecido, and Guimarães, André José Ribeiro. “Scientific publications on innovation: an analysis using text mining.” Revista Brasileira de Estratégia, vol. 8, no. 3, 2015, pp. 288-303, dx.doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.v8i3.14150.g13583. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Boehm, Guenter, and Fredericks, L J. “Strategic innovation management in global industry networks: the TFT LCD industry.” Asian Journal of Business Management, vol. 2, no. 4, 2010, pp. 110-120, maxwellsci.com/print/ajbm/v2-110-120.pdf. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Bradford, Samuel Clement. “Sources of information on scientific subjects.” Engineering, vol. 26, 1934, pp. 85-86, doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000407. Acessado 9 set. 2020.
Broadus, R N. “Toward a definition of "bibliometrics".” Scientometrics, vol. 12, no. 5-6, 1987, pp. 373- 379, doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680. Acessado 8 set. 2020.
Cancino, Christian A, et al. “Big names in innovation research: a bibliometric overview.” Current Science, vol. 113, no. 8, 2017, pp. 1507-1518. repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/148735. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Chesbrough, Henry. “Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers.” Long Range Planning, vol. 43, no. 2-3, 2010, pp. 354-363. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Drucker, Peter F. Innovation and entrepreneurship practices and principles. Routledge, 2015. Elsevier. Scopus Content Coverage Guide. Elsevier, 2020.
Evans, Steve, et al. “Business model innovation for sustainability: towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models.” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26. no.5, 2017, pp. 597-608, doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Forsman, Helena, and Temel, Serdal. “From a non-innovator to a high-innovation performer: networking as a driver.” Regional Studies, vol. 50, no. 7, 2016, pp. 1140-1153, doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.968120. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Galvão, Taís Freire, et al. “Principais itens para relatar revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises: a recomendação PRISMA.” Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, vol. 24, no. 4, 2015, pp. 335-342, doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Gil, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. 7. Atlas, 2019.
Godin, Benoit. “Models of innovation: why models of innovation are models, or what work is being done in calling them models?” Social Studies of Science, vol. 45, no. 4, 2018, pp. 570-596. doi.org/10.1177/0306312715596852. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Guedes, Vania L. S., and Borschiver, Suzana. “Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica.” Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação, vol. 6, no. 1, 2005, pp. 1- 18, www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=08b2e297-3603-412b-9d0d-e754a9a7423d. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Guedes, Vania Lisboa Silveira. “Estudo de um critério para indexação automática derivativa de textos científicos e tecnológicos.” Ciência da Informação, vol. 23, no. 3, 1994, pp. 318-326, revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/529. Acessado 9 set. 2020.
Guedes, Vania Lisboa Silveira. “A bibliometria e a gestão da informação e do conhecimento científico e tecnológico: uma revisão da literatura.” PontodeAcesso, vol. 6, no. 2, 2012, pp. 74-109, dx.doi.org/10.9771/1981-6766rpa.v6i2.5695. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Hirsch, Jorge E. “An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.” Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, vol. 102, no. 46, 2005, pp. 16569-16572. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102. Acessado 9 set. 2020.
Huggins, Robert, and Thompson, Piers. “Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory.” Small Business Economics, vol. 45, 2015, pp. 103-128, doi.org/10.1007/s11187- 015-9643-3. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Hulme, Edward Wyndham. Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization: two lectures delivered in the University of Cambridge in May, 1922. Forgotten Books, 2018.
Leydesdorff, Loet. “Synergy in knowledge-based innovation systems at national and regional levels: the triple-helix model and the fourth industrial revolution.” Journal of Open Innovation Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1-13, doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4020016. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Liu, Zhigao, et al. “Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis.” Scientometrics, vol. 103, 2015, pp. 135-158. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Lotka, Alfred James. “The frequency distribution of scientific productivity.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, 1926, pp. 317-323, www.jstor.org/stable/24529203. Acessado 9 set. 2020.
Machado Júnior, Celso, et al. “Análise de viabilidade de utilizar as leis da bibliometria em diferentes bases de pesquisa.” Anais do 38.o Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração. ANPAD, 2014, pp. 1-16.
Macias-Chapula, Cesar A. “O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional.” Ciência da Informação, vol. 27, no. 2, 1998, pp. 134-140, revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/794. Acessado 8 set. 2020.
Maia, Marcos, and Bezerra, Cicero Aparecido. “Análise bibliométrica dos artigos científicos de jurimetria publicados no Brasil.” Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, vol. 18, 2020, pp. 1-28, doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v18i0.8658889. Acessado 9 set. 2020.
Maricato, João Melo. “Procedimentos metodológicos em estudos bibliométricos e cientométricos: opções e reflexões no contexto dos processos de recuperação e organização da informação.” Organizado por Rogério Luiz Moraes Costa. Estudos contemporâneos em Comunicações e Artes: melhores teses e dissertações da ECA/USP. ECA/USP, 2010, pp. 1-19.
Marinova, Dora, and Phillimore, John. “Models of innovation.” The International handbook on innovation, Edited by Larisa V. Shavinina. Elsevier, 2003, pp. 44-53. doi.org/10.1016/B978- 008044198-6/50005-X. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Mello, Paula Maria Abrantes Cotta. Interdisciplinaridade na Pós-Graduação: estudo de seu impacto na produção de teses e dissertações do Programa de Pós-Graduação em História das Ciências e das Técnicas e Epistemologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2017. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Tese de Doutorado.
Merigó, José M, et al. “Fifty years of Information Sciences: a bibliometric overview.” Information Sciences, vol. 432, 2018, pp. 245-268, doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054. Acessado 7 set.2020.
Mongeon, Philippe, and Paul-Hus, Adele. “The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis.” Scientometrics, vol. 106, 2016, pp. 213-228, doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Moretti, Sérgio Luiz Amaral, and Campanario, Milton Abreu. “A produção intelectual brasileira em Responsabilidade Social Empresarial – RSE sob a ótica da bibliometria.” Revista de Administração Contemporânea, vol. 13, no. especial, 2009, pp. 68-86, www.scielo.br/pdf/rac/v13nspe/a06v13nspe.pdf. Acessado 11 set. 2020.
Morioka, Sandra Naomi, et al. “Sustainable business model innovation: exploring evidences in sustainability reporting.” Procedia CIRP, vol. 40, 2016, pp. 659-667, doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.151. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Mugnaini, Rogério, et al. “Indicadores bibliométricos da produção científica brasileira: uma análise a partir da base Pascal.” Ciência da Informação, vol. 33, no. 2, 2004, pp. 123-131, revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1054. Acessado 8 set. 2020.
Naranjo-Valencia, Julia Clemencia, et al. “The relationship between training and innovation in companies.” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 22, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1-33, doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500123. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Oslo Manual 2018: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 4. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018.
Pimenta, Alcineide Aguiar, et al. “A bibliometria nas pesquisas acadêmicas.” Scientia - Revista de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão, vol. 4, no. 7, 2017, pp. 1-13, doi:10.20396/rdbci.v17i0.8652810. Acessado 8 set. 2020.
Powell, Taman, et al. “Mapping knowledge and innovation research themes: using bibliometrics for classification, evolution, proliferation and determinism.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 20, no. 3/4, 2016, pp. 174-199, www.inderscience.com/offer.php?id=77960. Acessado 7 set. 2020.
Pritchard, Alan. “Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics.” Journal of documentation, vol. 25, no. 4, 1969, pp. 348-349.
Quoniam, Luc, et al. “Inteligência obtida pela aplicação de data mining em base de teses francesas sobre o Brasil.” Ciência da Informação, vol. 30, no. 2, 2001, pp. 20-28, doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652001000200004. Acessado 6 out. 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 André José Ribeiro Guimarães, Paulo Sergio da Conceição Moreira, Cicero Aparecido Bezerrra, Dr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
