Convergences and divergences between Digital Diplomatics and Digital Forensics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1940-1640.2020.v14n4.10528Keywords:
Digital Diplomatics, Digital Forensics, Digital record, AuthenticityAbstract
Based on recent discussions in the scope of archival studies on the theoretical-methodological development of Diplomatics in the creation, maintenance and preservation of authentic digital records, what has agreed to call Digital Diplomatics, a proposal which research to contribute for studies of digital records to propose a joint analysis with also emerging Digital Forensic Science. The research consists of a systematization of the concepts, definitions and, mainly, existing projects about Digital Diplomatics comparing them with Digital Forensic Science. An analysis of the scientific literature of the area found in international databases was carried out comparing it with Digital Forensic Science. The results demonstrate that the areas converge concerning the use of tools, the understanding of the legal context in which the records are inserted, the search for impartially identifying the context of their digital objects, the application of similar concepts and methods and the capacity that its professionals have to certify the integrity, authenticity, and reliability of digital objects in legal processes.
Downloads
References
Bellotto, Heloísa Liberalli. Como fazer análise diplomática e análise tipológica de documento de arquivo. São Paulo: Arquivo do Estado; Imprensa Oficial do Estado, 2002, www.arquivoestado.sp.gov.br/site/assets/publicacao/anexo/como_fazer_analise_diplomatica_e_analise_tipologica.pdf. Acessado 22 set. 2019.
Calazans, Carlos Henrique, e Calazans, Sandra Maria Pereira. "Ciência Forense: das Origens à Ciencia Forense Computacional”. In: XV Seminário Regional de Informática, 2005, Santo Ângelo. Anais do 15º Seminário Regional de Informática. Santo Ângelo: Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões, 2005.
Chaui, Marilena. Convite à Filosofia. 14. ed. São Paulo: editora ática. 2012. ISBN: 978-85-08-13469-4.
Chemello, Emiliano. “Ciência Forense: impressões digitais”. Química Virtual. 11 p, 2006, www.quimica.net/emiliano/artigos/2006dez_forense1.pdf. Acessado 02 nov. 2019.
Cohen, Frederick B. “Digital diplomatics and forensics: going forward on a global basis”. Records Management Journal. v. 25, n. 1, p. 21-44, 2015.
Cohen, Fred. Digital Forensic Evidence Examination. 5. ed. Livermore, CA: Fred Cohen & Associates, 2013, 517 p.
Conselho Nacional De Arquivos. Camara Tecnica De Documentos Eletronicos. Glossário de documentos arquivísticos digitais. 7ª versão, 2016, conarq.gov.br/images/ctde/Glossario/2016-CTDE-Glossario_V7_public.pdf. Acessado 04 jul. 2020.
Dietrich, Dianne, and Adelstein, Frank. “Archival Science, digital forensics, and new media art”. Elsevier. p.137-145, 2015.
Digital Forensics Research Workshop, 2001, https://dfrws.org/sites/default/files/session-files/a_road_map_for_digital_forensic_research.pdf. Acesso em: 04 jul. 2020.
Duranti, Luciana, and Endicott-Popovsky, Barbara. “Digital Records Forensics: A New Science and Academic Program for Forensic Readiness”, Journal of Digital Forensics, vol. 5, 2010, Security and Law, commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol5/iss2/4/. Acessado 03 nov. 2018.
Duranti, Luciana. “From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics”. Archivaria, vol. 68, p. 39-66, 2009.
Duranti, Luciana, and Rogers, Corinne. “Educating for trust”. Arch Sci, p. 373-390, 2011.
Fachone, Patricia de Cassia Valerio. Ciencia e justiça: a institucionalização da ciencia forense no Brasil. 2008. 163f. Instituto de Geociencias, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2008, www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/286843. Acessado 11 ago. 2018.
Fachone, Patrícia, and Velho, Léa. “Ciência Forense: Interseção, Justiça, Ciência e Tecnologia”. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade, vol.3, no.4, p. 139-161, 2007.
Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves, and Sales, Rodrigo de. “Análise documental: concepções do universo acadêmico brasileiro em Ciência da Informação”. DataGramaZero – Revista de Ciência da Informação, vol. 11, no. 1, s/p, 2010, www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/article/download/8293. Acessado 27 nov. 2019.
Interpares Project. InterPARES: International Research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems, 2020, www.interpares.org. Acessado 27 nov. 2019.
Irons, Alastair. “Computer Forensics and Records Management – Compatible Disciplines”. Records Management Journal. vol. 16, no. 2, p. 102-112, 2006.
Lungarzo, Carlos. O que é ciência. 7. ed. São Paulo: editora brasiliense. 1995. ISBN: 85-01220-6.
Mogollón, Juan Bernardo Montoya, and Rodríguez, Sonia Maria Troitiño. “Diplomática Forense: revisão histórica para a abordagem do documento nato-digital de arquivo”. Ivestigación Bibliotecológica. México: vol. 33, no. 78, p. 47-62, 2019.
Oliveira, João Luiz Moreira de. Perícia e investigação criminal: uma proposta de melhoria do modelo organizacional visando a otimização de resultados, 2013, bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/11868/PER%C3%8DCIA%20E%20INVESTIGA%C3%87%C3%83O%20CRIMINAL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Fundação Getulio Vargas, Dissertação Mestrado. Acessado 18 fev. 2020.
Reis, Marcelo Abdalla dos, and Geus, Paulo Lício de. Análise Forense de Intrusões em Sistemas Computacionais: Técnicas, Procedimentos e Ferramentas, 2002, www.truzzi.com.br/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Monografia_AnaliseForense.pdf. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Monografia Mestrado. Acessado 30 out. 2019.
Rodrigues, Ana Célia. “Identificação como requisito metodológico para a gestão de documentos e acesso a informações na administração pública brasileira”. Ciência da Informação, vol. 1, no. 42, 2015, p. 64-80.
Rogers, Corinne. “Diplomatics of born digital documents – considering documentar for in a digital environment”. Records Management Journal, vo. 25, p. 6-20, 2015.
Rogers, Corinne. “From time theft to time stamps: mapping the development of digital forensics from law enforcement to archival authority”. International Journal of Digital Humanities: p. 13-28, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-019-00002-y. Acessado 20 jan. 2020.
Sales, Rodrigo de. Tesauros e ontologias sob a luz da Teoria Comunicativa da Terminologia, 2008. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Dissertação Mestrado.
Scientific Working Group On Digital Evidence. Digital & Multimedia Evidence Glossary, vol 3, 2016, https://www.swgde.org/documents/published. Acessado 05 jul. 2020.
Sickel, Theodor Von. Acta regum er imperatorum Karolinorum digesta et enarrata. Wien: Duck und Verlag Von Carl Gerold’s Sohn, 1867.
Silva, Anelise Barbosa da, and Tognoli, Natália Bolfarini. “Diplomática digital: uma nova abordagem?” In: BARROS, T.H.B. ET AL (Org). A pesquisa e o ensino da Arquivologia: perspectivas na era digital. Belém: Editora da UFPA, 2019. p. 98-107.
Tessier, Georges. Leçon d’ouverture du cours de diplomatique à L’Ecole des chartes. In: Bibliothèque de l’Ecole des Chartes, 1930, tome 91, p. 241-263.
Tognoli, Natália Bolfarini. A construção teórica da Diplomática: em busca da sistematização de seus marcos teóricos como subsídios aos estudos arquivísticos. 1. ed. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2014.
Tognoli, Natália Bolfarini. “Diplomática: dos diplomas aos documentos digitais”. Revista do Arquivo, no. 6, p. 34-46, 2018.
Tognoli, Natália Bolfarini. “Metateoria e Diplomática: a construção de um novo modelo de análise para a identificação de documentos de arquivo”. Scire. p. 75-81, 2015.
United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime. Conscientização sobre o local de crime e as evidências materiais em especial para pessoal não-forense. New York, 2010, www.novo.justica.gov.br/sua-seguranca/seguranca-publica/analise-e-pesquisa/download/estudos_diversos/6manual_pericia_nao-forense-1.pdf. Acessado 18 fev. 2020.
Xie, Sherry L. “Building Foundations for Digital Records Forensics: A Comparative Study of the Concept of Reproduction in Digital Records Management and Digital Forensics”. The American Archivist, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 576-599, 2011, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23079051?seq=1. Acessado 14 jan. 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
When submitting an article, the authors retain the copyright of the article, giving full rights to the Brazilian Journal of Information Science to publish the text.
The author(s) agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) Readers/users are free to: - Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format - Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: - Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. - ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: - You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. - No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
