Domain analysis of the literature on COVID-19 in Information Science’s national context

Autores

  • Isadora Victorino Evangelista UFSCar
  • Marcos Oliveira da Costa
  • Samuel Santos da Rosa
  • Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros
  • Rita do Carmo Ferreira Laipelt
  • Luciana Monteiro-Krebs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02137

Palavras-chave:

domain analysis, covid-19, information in health

Resumo

In the past two years, science has been mobilized around studies centered on the new pandemic phenomenon known as COVID-19, a variation of the coronavirus with higher transmission capacity and higher mortality. Thus, as a way of investigating the state of the art of this topic in the field of Information Science, this research sought to answer the following question: what is the Brazilian scientific production in Information Science regarding the COVID-19 pandemic? As main justification, we understand that systematically identifying and disseminating those studies may help the construction of an appropriate theoretical survey on the theme in the national scope. To support our research theoretically and methodologically, we reserved a section to explore Domain Analysis (DA). Proposed by Hjørland and Albrechtsen (1995) around Information Science, this approach allows us to analyze domains of knowledge from their social interactions as discursive communities. Then, we describe the context of information in health, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic context. This is a quali-quantitative research: we made a textual analysis of the keywords found in the articles that make up the corpus and applied bibliometric criteria to identify occurrence patterns of the most productive authors and journals. Being a descriptive-exploratory research, we aimed to describe how the pandemic phenomenon influenced textual production in the context of Information Science, seeking to better explore the theme and look for possible understandings and reflections about the subject. It was possible to infer that the scientific dissemination of knowledge around this theme is closely related to research in information in health, and it even includes a new term in this perspective: “infodemia” (infodemic), a term that is related to the vastness of information made available via the web, especially on social media. In addition to that, the incidence frequency of terms such as comunidade (community) and competência em informação (information competence)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Atkinson, Sarah, and Abu el Haj, Mônica. "Domain analysis for qualitative public health data". Health Policy and Planning, vol. 11, no. 4, 1996, pp. 438-444.

Barros, T. H. B. "Análise Discurso de Michel Pêcheux e a Organização do Conhecimento: possibilidades teórico-meotodológicas". Ensaios em Organização do Conhecimento. Organized by I. S. Amorim and, R. de Sales. Editora UDESC, 2021, pp. 61-78.

Castanha, R. C. G., and Grácio, M. C. C. "Bibliometrics contribution to the metatheoretical and domain analysis studies". Knowledge Organization, vol. 41, no. 2, 2014, pp. 171-174.

Cipriano, R. “Um vírus nem sempre foi um vírus. Palavras que mudaram de significado com os tempos”. Observador, Lisboa, 2016, http://observador.pt/2015/07/26/um-virus-sempre-um-virus-palavras-mudaram-significado-os-tempos/. Accessed 28 jun. 2021.

Domingues, L. “Infodemia: uma ameaça à saúde pública global durante e após a pandemia de Covid-19”. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 15, no. 1, 2021, pp. 12-17, https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2237. Accessed 15 jun. 2021.

Fiorillo, A., and Gorwood, P. “The consequences of the COVID- 19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice”. European Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-2, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156565/pdf/S0924933820000358a.pdf. Accessed 13 jun. 2021.

Guimarães, J. A. C. and Tognoli, N. B. "Provenance as a Domain Analysis Approach in Archival Knowledge Organization". Knowledge Organization: Ergon-verlag, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 562–569, 2015.

Hjørland, Birger, and Albrechtsen, Hanne. “Toward a new horizon in Information Science: domain-analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, no. 6, jul. 1995, pp. 400-425.

Hjørland, Birger. “Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative”. Journal of Documentation, vol. 58, no. 4, 2002, pp. 422-462.

Hjørland, Birger. “Domain analysis”. Knowledge Organization, vol. 44, no. 6, 2011, pp. 436-464.

Hjørland, Birger. "Domain analysis". Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization. Organized by Birger Hjørland and C. Gnoli, vol. 44, no. 6, 2017, pp. 20-80.

International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. “Naming the 2019 Coronavirus”. 2020.

Krieger, M. G., and Santiago, M. S. “Terminologia Médica e Variação”. Anais do 17° Congreso Internacional Asociación De Lingüística Y Filología De América Latina: João Pessoa, ALFAL, 2014, http://www.mundoalfal.org/CDAnaisXVII/trabalhos/R1134-1.pdf. Accessed 13 jun. 2021.

López-Huertas, M. J. "Domain Analysis for Interdisciplinary Knowledge Domains". Knowledge Organization, vol. 42, no. 8, 2015, pp. 570–580.

Okada, Mihoko, et al. "Domain analysis and modeling to improve comparability of health statistics". MedInfo, 2001.

Oliveira, E. F. T., and Grácio, M. C. C. "Studies of author cocitation analysis: a bibliometric approach for domain analysis". IRIS-Revista de Informação, Memória e Tecnologia, vol. 2, no. 1, 2014, pp. 12–23, http://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/IRIS/article/view/500. Accessed 7 jan. 2022.

Orlandi, E. P. O que é lingüística. Brasiliense, 2007.

Smiraglia, R. "Epistemology of domain analysis." Cultural Frames of Knowledge. Organized by R. Smiraglia and H. Lee. Ergon, 2012, pp. 111–124.

Smiraglia, R. P. Domain analysis for knowledge organization: tools for ontology extraction. Elsevier Chandos Pub, 2015a.

Smiraglia, R. P. "Domain analysis of domain analysis for knowledge organization: observations on an emergent methodological cluster." Knowledge Organization, vol. 42, no. 8, 2015b, pp. 602–611.

Tennis, J. T. "Two axes of domains for domain analysis". Knowledge Organization, vol. 30, no. 3/4, 2003, pp. 191–195.

Tennis, J. T. "What does domain analysis look like in form, function and genre?". Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012, http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/bjis/article/view/3026. Accessed 07 jan. 2022.

Unesco. “Draft text of the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science”. Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts (Category II), 2021, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376893. Accessed 13 jun. 2021.

World Health Organization. “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Pandemic”. 2020a, https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. Accessed 15 jun. 2021.

World Health Organization. “Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it". 2020b, https://www.who.int/ emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. Accessed 15 jun. 2021.

World Health Organization. “Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants”. 2021, https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/. Accessed 15 jun. 2021.

Zeng, M. L., et al. “Implications of Knowledge Organization Systems for Health Information Exchange and Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Data And Information Management, vol. 4, no. 3, 2020, pp. 148-170, https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-828345. Accessed 13 maio 2021.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-03-24

Como Citar

Evangelista, I. V., M. O. da Costa, S. S. da Rosa, T. H. B. Barros, R. do C. F. Laipelt, e L. Monteiro-Krebs. “Domain Analysis of the Literature on COVID-19 in Information Science’s National Context”. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, vol. 16, março de 2022, p. e02137, doi:10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02137.

Edição

Seção

Dossiê "Domain Analysis"