State of the art of nursing education and the challenges to use remote technologies in the time of Corona Virus Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v30.10087Keywords:
COVID-19, Changes, Education, Health training, Nursing, Technologies, InnovationsAbstract
Introduction: The Corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic caused, among others, the need for colleges and universities managers around the world to reinvent new ways of providing education preserving its good quality at the same time. With the new ordinances of the Ministry of Education and Health, all courses can use remote methodologies for the continuity on the current school year. With new challenges and paradigms emerging from this methodological proposal: provide for the user the feeling of immersion, of being in the class room, from the navigation and interaction in this virtual environment, at the same time that the educator, respecting the educational principles and the pedagogical approach that he believes, does not transform this moment into a simple distance education.
Objective: to describe the state of the art on nursing education and the challenges of using remote technologies in the time of Corona virus pandemic.
Methods: this is a reflective study based on secondary sources of literature relevant to the theme, considering articles from national and international journals and recent productions on education, health training, remote technologies, COVId-19 and public health.
Results: it is evident that experiencing the effects of the corona virus pandemic (COVID-19) in the health educational sector, especially in the field of nursing, goes beyond a structural reorganization of courses. It implies change attitude of managers, teachers and students to reformulate educational practices (sometimes with traditional tools), with innovative practices preserving a methodology that provides to the student criticality reflection, dialogue, bonding and interaction; elements that are part of a training aimed at transformation, empowerment and not just the transmission of knowledge. In this context, the COVID-19 pandemic caused paradigm shifts perhaps not yet overcome by health science institutions , because when they perceived themselves within a reality that generated changes in the political, economic, cultural and social aspects at a global level, they had to reinvent and insert new ways of teaching in their work process; they had to discuss different educational approaches and, given the needs to readjust health teaching methods, they inserted remote technologies as essential tools to meet the real need for continuity of classes in non-face-to-face model. For many, it is a challenge, as it currently permeates a reflection on the attention of distance learning in the field of nursing and other courses in the health area. However, as it opened up to discussions about new ways of teaching mediated by innovation, it can be said that this will be one of the greatest impact of the pandemic in benefit the education: the contribution of new information and communication technologies in the teaching-learning process for training in health, as well as the reflection on distance education and its concepts, differentiating it from the concepts of remote methodology and the use of technologies.
Conclusion: In nursing education, the discussion related to the use of remote technologies in the classroom has always been a point of debate. However, with the need to include these tools for the continuity of classes in the non-face-to-face model resulting from the social isolation strategy motivated by the pandemic of COVID-19, it can provide an opportunity to have a new look on the subject and perhaps there is an opportunity to expand the debate on the use of remote methodologies in health education, seeking a reflection on their interaction with the other teaching methods already implemented.
Downloads
References
2. Salvador PTCO, Rodrigues CCFM, Lima KYN, Alves KYA, Santos VEP. Use and development of teaching technologies presented in nursing research. Rev Rene. 2015;16(3):442-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2015000300018
3. Teixeira AC. A educação em um contexto de cibercultura. Rev Esp Acad. 2012;12(139):25-32.
4. Kenski VM. Tecnologias e ensino presencial e a distância. 6 ed. São Paulo: Papirus, 2008; p.78.
5. Cyrino EG, Pinto HA, Oliveira FP, Figueiredo AM, Domingues SM, Parreira CMSF. Há pesquisa sobre ensino na saúde no Brasil?. ABCS Health Sci 2015;40(3):46-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.v40i3.787
6. Cohen EL, Hoffner C. Finding meaning in a celebrity’s death: the relationship between parasocial attachment, grief, and sharing educational health information related to Robin Williams on social network sites. Comp Hum Behavior. 2016;65:643-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.042
7. Pissaia LF, Costa AEK, Rehfeldt MJH, Moreschi C. Tecnologia educacional no processo de formação de enfermeiros. CINERGES. 2017;18(3):185-9. DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17058/cinergis.v18i3.8865
8. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, LI X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
9. Chen S, Yang J, Yang W, Wang C, Bärnighausen T. COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):764-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30421-9
10. Fong MW, Gao H, Wong JY, Xiao J, Shiu EYC, Ryu S, et al. Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings-Social Distancing Measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2605.190995
11. Prem K, Liu Y, Russel TW, Kucharski AJ, Eggo RM, Davies N, et al. The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the Covid-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modeling study. Lancet Public Health. 2020; S2468-2667(20)30073-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6
12. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Câmara dos Deputados. Legislação Informatizada - Dados da Norma. Portaria nº 2.253, de 18 de outubro de 2001. [cited 2020 Apr 13] Available from: https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/marg/portar/2001/portaria-2253-18-outubro-2001-412758-norma-me.html
13. Brasil. Ministério de Estado da Educação. Secretaria de Educação a Distância. Portaria n. 4.059, de 10 de dezembro de 2004. [cited 2020 Apr 13] Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/sesu/arquivos/pdf/nova/acs_portaria4059.pdf
14. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Conselho Nacional de Educação. Câmara de Ensino Superior. Resolução nº 1, de 11 março de 2016. Estabelece Diretrizes e Normas Nacionais para a Oferta de Programas e Cursos de Educação Superior na Modalidade a Distância. [cited 2020 Apr 13] Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/docman/marco-2016-pdf/35541-res-cne-ces-001-14032016-pdf/file
15. Barbosa ECV, Viana LO. Um olhar sobre a formação do enfermeiro/docente no Brasil. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2008;16(3):339-44.
16. Markham HC. An internet-based expert system for teaching introductory data structures. J Comp Sci Colleges. 2001;16(3):155-65.
17. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Conselho Nacional de Educação. Resolução CNE/CES Nº 3 de 7 de novembro de 2001: institui Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Enfermagem. [cited 2020 Apr 13] Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/cne/arquivos/pdf/CES03.pdf
18. Parker BC, Myrick F. A critical examination of high-fidelity human patient simulation within the context of nursing pedagogy. Nurse Educ Today. 2009; 29(3):322-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.012
19. Onda EL. Situated cognition: its relationship to simulation in nursing education. Clin Simul Nurs. 2012;8(7):e273-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.11.004
20. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Portaria Nº 343, de 17 de março de 2020. Dispõe sobre a substituição das aulas presenciais por aulas em meios digitais enquanto durar a situação de pandemia do Novo Coronavírus - COVID-19. [cited 2020 Apr 13] Available from: http://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-n-343-de-17-de-marco-de-2020-248564376
21. Bastable SB. O enfermeiro como educador. 3 ed. São Paulo: Artmed, 2010; p.688.
22. Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. 2016. [cited 2020 Apr 13] Available from: http://www.integrate-hta.eu/downloads/
23. Lira ALBC, Fernandes MICD, Costa IA, Silva RSC. Estratégia de aprimoramento do ensino do exame físico em enfermagem. Enferm Foco. 2015;6(1/4):57-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2015.v6.n1/4.578
24. Nosow V, Püschel VAA. O ensino de conteúdos atitudinais na formação inicial do enfermeiro. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43(spe2):1232-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000600015
25. Bezerra IMP, Sorpreso ICE. Concepts and movements in health promotion to guide educational practices. J Hum Growth Dev. 2016;26(1):11-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.113709
