The Domain Analysis Clinic
A Singular Advance in Domain Analysis for Knowledge Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02160Palavras-chave:
domain analysis, clinic, domain analysis clinic, Institute for Knowledge Organization and Structure, DAC, meta-analysisResumo
Domain analysis is a primary approach to the representation of shared ontological bases in knowledge organization. The growth of domain analysis as a paradigm is demonstrated over a period of two decades. The Domain Analysis Clinic, or DAC is a core methodology generated for focused concept discovery combining meta-analytical theoretical research with the formation of domain-specific knowledge organization systems. The emergence of the DAC as a tool for meta-analysis and discourse analysis has demonstrated the efficacy of focused concept formation for taxonomic representation as well as for theoretical discovery in KO. The evidence presented here strongly directly suggests the continued honing and maturity of domain analysis as a paradigm in KO.
Downloads
Referências
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. 1982 “Classification Science—A True Scientific Discipline?” International Classification 9:63.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. 1999. “Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature.” Knowledge Organization 26: 192-202.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. 2006. “Knowledge Organization: A New Science?” Knowledge Organization 33: 11-19.
Dahlberg, Ingetraut. 2011. “Brief Communication: How to Improve ISKO’s Standing. Ten Desiderata for Knowledge Organization.” Knowledge Organization 38: 69-74.
Downie, J. Stephen. 2003. “Music Information Retrieval.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37: 295-340.
Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves, Ely Tannuri de Oliveira, Cabrini Gracio, and Maria Claudia. 2012. “Theoretical Referents in Knowledge Organization: A Domain Analysis of the Knowledge Organization Journal.” In Categories, Contexts and Relations in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference, 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India, ed. A. Neelameghan and K. S. Raghavan. Advances in Knowledge Organization 13. Würzburg: Ergon, 31-38.
Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves and Joseph T. Tennis. 2012. “Constant Pioneers: The Citation Frontiers of Indexing Theory in the ISKO International Proceedings.” In Categories, Contexts and Relations in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference, 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India, ed. A. Neelameghan and K. S. Raghavan. Advances in Knowledge Organization 13. Würzburg: Ergon, 39-43
Henry, Joshua A., comp. 2020. “LCGFT Music Terms.” IKOS Bulletin 2, no. 3: 28-46.
Hjørland, Birger. 2002. Domain Analysis in Information Science. Eleven approaches - Traditional as well as Innovative.” Journal of Documentation 58: 422-62.
Hjørland, Birger and Albrechtsen, Hanne. 1995. “Toward a New Horizon in information Science: Domain-Analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46: 400-25.
Hjørland, Birger. 2017. “Domain Analysis.” Knowledge Organization 44, no. 6: 436-64. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, eds. Birger Hjørland and Claudio Gnoli, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/domain_analysis
Institute for Knowledge Organization and Structure, Inc. (IKOS). 2019. “First IKOS Domain Analysis Clinic Taking Place in Mid-March.” IKOS Bulletin 1, no. 1:1.
IKOS. 2020. “Mission Statement.” IKOS Bulletin 2, no. 3:73.
Lee, Deborah. 2017. “Modelling Music: A Theoretical Approach to the Classification of Notated Western Art Music.” PhD diss., City, University of London.
Lee, Deborah and Lyn Robinson. 2017. “The Heart of Music Classification: Toward a Model of Classifying Musical Medium.” Journal of Documentation 74: 258-77.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 1999. “A Postmodern Theory of Knowledge Organization.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science October 31, 1999, Vol. 62, ed. Larry Wood. Medford: Information Today, pp. 547–56.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2008. “Design and Construction of Controlled Vocabularies: Analysis of Actors, Domain, and Constraints.” Knowledge Organization 35:, 16-29.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2011. “The Modernity of Classification.” Journal of Documentation 67: 710–30.
Milonas, Elizabeth, Sergey ZHerebchevsky and Richard P. Smiraglia. 2020. “CT-NIB Taxonomy for Nursing Information Behavior: KO in the Pandemic.” IKOS Bulletin 2, no. 2: 13-17.
Pajarillo, Edmund J.Y. 2005. “Contextual Perspectives of Information for Home Care Nurses: Towards a Framework of Nursing Information Behavior (NIB).” PhD diss., Long Island University.
Pajarillo, Edmund J.Y. 2020. “Knowledge Discovery and Development as an Ongoing Process in the use of Data and Information by Nurses to Deliver Safe and Quality Care.” IKOS Bulletin 2, no. 3: 59-64.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2013. “The Epistemological Dimension of Knowledge Organization.” IRIS 2 no. 1. Available: http://www.repositorios.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/IRIS/article/view/498
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2012. “Epistemology of Domain Analysis.” In Cultural Frames of Knowledge, ed. Richard P. Smiraglia and Hur-Li Lee. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 111-24.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2013. “Prolegomena to a New Order: A Domain-Analytical Review of the Influence of S. R. Ranganathan on Knowledge Organization. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2013: 709-19. Available at: http://www.i-scholar.in/index.php/sjim/article/view/43812.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2015a. Domain Analysis for Knowledge Organization: Tools for Ontology Generation. Chandos Information Professional Series. Waltham, Mass.: Chandos.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2015b. “Domain Analysis of Domain Analysis for Knowledge Organization: Observations on an Emergent Methodological Cluster.” Knowledge Organization 42, no. 8: 602-11.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2018. “Index.” Unpublished manuscript for second ed. of The Elements of Knowledge Organization. Springer International Publishing.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2020. “On Clinics: The Power of Empirical Means.” IKOS Bulletin 2:70-72.
Smiraglia, Richard P. and Daniel MartÍnez-Ávila. 2020. Smiraglia and MartÍnez-Ávila to DAC3. Lake Oswego, OR, August 11, 2020.
Smiraglia, Richard P. and Jihee Beak. 2015. “Producing Navigable Knowledge Organization with Knowledge Interaction.” In Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization", Vol. 5. Los Angeles, CA, 137-44.
Smiraglia, Richard P. and María J. López-Huertas. 2015. “Domain Analysis Redux: An Introduction.” Knowledge Organization 42, no. 8: 553-56.
Smiraglia, Richard P. and Melodie J. Fox. 2018. Smiraglia and Fox to DAC1. Shorewood, WI, Nov. 18, 2018.
Smiraglia, Richard P. and Rick Szostak. 2020. “Identifying and Classifying the Phenomena of Music. In Knowledge Organization at the Interface: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark, ed. Marianne Lykke, Tanja Svarre, Mette Skov and Daniel Martínez-Ávila. Advances in Knowledge Organization 17. Baden-Baden: Ergon Verlag, 421-7.
Smiraglia, Richard P., Joshua Henry, Elizabeth Milonas, Chris Marchese and Sergey Zherebchevsky. 2020. “A Formal Taxonomy of Knowledge Organization: Meta-Analysis and Facet Analysis.” Knowledge Organization 47, no. 7: 558-73.
Smiraglia, Richard P., Edmund Pajarillo, ELizabeth Milonas and Sergey Zherebchevsky. 2020. “Home Health Care Nursing in the Pandemic: Preliminary Analysis of Video Interviews.” IKOS Bulletin 2, no. 3: 52-55.
Smiraglia, Richard P., Elizabeth Milonas, SErgey Zherebchevsky and Edmund Pajarillo. 2021. “Nursing Information Behavior (NIB) in the Pandemic: Resilience of a Knowledge Base.” Paper presented at North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization July 9-11, 2021.
Szostak, Rick. 2012. “The Basic Concepts Classification.” In Categories, Contexts, and Relations in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference, 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India, ed. A. Neelameghan and K.S. Raghavan. Advances in Knowledge Organization 13. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2012, 24-30.
Szostak, Rick. 2012. “Toward a Classification of Relationships.” Knowledge Organization 39: 83-94.
Szostak, Rick and Deborah Lee. 2020. “Classifying Musical Genre and the BCC: A Report on Progress.” IKOS Bulletin 2, no. 3: 20-22.
Tennis, Joseph T. 2003. “Two Axes of Domains for Domain Analysis.” Knowledge Organization 30:191–5.
Wu, Yejun. 2016. Oil Spill Impacts: Taxonomic and Ontological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Richard Smiraglia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ao submeter um artigo os autores mantêm os direitos autorais do mesmo, cedendo ao Brazilian Journal of Information Science plenos direitos para publicação do referido texto.
O (s) autor (es) concorda(m) que o artigo, se aceito editorialmente para publicação, deve ser licenciado sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa /4.0) Os leitores / usuários são livres para: - Compartilhar - copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato - Adaptar - remixar, transformar e desenvolver o material para qualquer finalidade, mesmo comercialmente. O licenciante não pode revogar essas liberdades desde que você siga os termos da licença. Sob os seguintes termos: - Atribuição - Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se foram feitas alterações. Você pode fazê-lo de qualquer maneira razoável, mas não de maneira que sugira que o licenciante endossa você ou seu uso. - ShareAlike - Se você remixar, transformar ou desenvolver o material, deverá distribuir suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original. Sem restrições adicionais - Você não pode aplicar termos legais ou medidas tecnológicas que restrinjam legalmente outras pessoas a fazer o que a licença permitir. Avisos: - Você não precisa cumprir a licença para elementos do material em domínio público ou nos casos em que seu uso é permitido por uma exceção ou limitação aplicável. - Não há garantias. A licença pode não fornecer todas as permissões necessárias para o uso pretendido. Por exemplo, outros direitos, como publicidade, privacidade ou direitos morais, podem limitar a maneira como você usa o material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
