The Concept of Power in Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault: A Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/2237-7743.2017.v6n2.07.p344Palavras-chave:
PowerResumo
The concept of power has been the focus of discussion of many thinkers that attempted to understand who are their agents, how it is created and what are its main goals. In this scenario, Michel Foucault and Hannah Arendt have its respective and relevant conceptions of power and how it is expressed in our contemporary society. For the first thinker, power is everywhere and it is exercised in everyday life. For the german philosopher, power is expressed collectivelly. Therefore, the main goal of this essay is to analyse and compare their respective conceptions of power, especially how they understand resistance and violence. In this sense, by using bibliographic resources, this essay is a descriptive and comparative study about the conceptions of power for Hannah Arendt and for Michel Foucault. By a hypothetical-deductive approach, it is understood that the two conceptions are complementary since the French philosopher has a broader concept and Hannah Arendt offers more tools to analyse the possibility of resistance to power. In fact, the two thinkers offer us tools to comprehend power as a positive, criative and fluid factor.
Keywords: Power; Michel Foucault; Hannah Arendt.
Resumo: O conceito de poder tem sido foco de discussão de muitos pensadores que tentam entender seus agentes, como é criado e quais são seus objetivos. Neste cenário, Michel Foucault e Hannah Arendt possuem suas respectivas e relevantes contribuições sobre o que é poder e como ele é expresso na nossa sociedade contemporânea. Para o primeiro pensador, o poder está em todos os lugares e é exercício cotidianamente. Para a pensadora alemã, o poder é expressado por uma coletividade. O objetivo deste artigo, portanto, é analisar e comparar suas visões sobre poder, sobretudo sobre como entendem resistência e violência. Dessa forma, partindo de fontes bibliográficas, realiza-se um estudo descritivo e comparado das visões de poder para Hannah Arendt e Michel Foucault. Com abordagem hipotética-dedutiva, compreende-se que as duas concepções podem ser consideradas como complementares uma vez que o filósofo francês possui um conceito mais amplo que Hannah Arendt e esta contribui melhor para se analisar a possibilidade de resistência ao poder. De fato, estes dois autores nos possibilitam compreender o poder enquanto fator positivo, criador e fluído.
Palavras-chave: Poder; Michel Foucault; Hannah Arendt.
Recebido em: agosto/2016.
Aprovado em: agosto/2017.
Downloads
Métricas
Referências
ARENDT, Hannah. On Violence, London: Harvest/HBJ Book, 1969.
ARENDT, Hannah. Between Past and Future- Eight exercises in political thought. London: Penguin Books, 2006.
BERNSTEIN, Richard. “Hannah Arendt’s Reflections on Violence and Power”, Iris, No.III, pp. 3-30, 2011.
BREEN, Keith. “Violence and power: A critique of Hannah Arendt on the “political””, Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol.33, No.3, pp. 343-272, 2007.
DAHL, Robert. “The Concept of Power”, Behavioural Science, Vol.2, No.3, pp.201-215, 1957.
DIGESER, Peter. “The Fourth Face of Power”, The Journal of Politics, Vol.54, No.4, pp.977-1007, 1992.
DOWNING, Lisa. The Cambridge Introduction to Michel Foucault, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
DREYFUS, Hubert; RABINOW, Paul. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1983.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Discipline and punish- the birth of the prison, London: Penguin Books,1977.
FOUCAULT, Michel. The History of Sexuality: Vol.1- An Introduciton, New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Power/Knowledge-Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
GALLIE, W.B. “Essentially Contested Concepts”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol.56, pp.167-198, 1956.
GORDON, Neve. “On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault”, Human Studies, Vol. 25, No.2, pp.125-145, 2002.
HABERMAS, Jurgen; MCCARTHY, Thomas. “Hannah Arendt’s Communications Concept of Power”, Social Research, Vol.44, No.1, pp. 3-24, 1977.
HOBBES, Thomas. Leviathan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
HOLLOWAY, John. Change the World Without Taking Power- A meaning of Revolution Today”, Pluto Press, 2003.
HOY, David (ed). Foucault: a critical reader, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
LINDAHL, Hans. Fault Lines of Globalizations- Legal Order and the Politics of A-legality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
LUKES, Steven. Power: A Radical View. [online]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Available from:<http://www.myilibrary.com?ID=85996> 6 December 2015.
NEGRI, Antonio. Insurgencies- Constituent Power and the Modern State, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
YOUNG-BRUEHL, Elisabeth. Why Arendt Matters, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.
WARTENBERG, Thomas. “The Forms of Power”, Analyse & Kritik, Vol.10, pp. 3-31, 1988.
WENMAN, Mark. “Power”, in I. Mackenzie (ed.) Political concepts: a reader and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.370-403, 2005.
WENMAN, Mark. Agonistic Democracy. [online]. Cambridge University Press, 2013. Available from:<http://www.myilibrary.com?ID=538471> 6 December 2015.
