The projective theory of consciousness

from neuroscience to philosophical psychology

Autores

  • Alfredo Pereira Junior

Palavras-chave:

Projection, Consciousness, Cognitive, Non-Conceptual, Feeling

Resumo

The development of the interdisciplinary areas of cognitive, affective and action neurosciences contributes to the identification of neurobiological bases of conscious experience. The structure of consciousness was philosophically conceived a century ago (HUSSERL, 1913) as consisting of a subjective pole, the bearer of experiences, and an objective pole composed of experienced contents. In more recent formulations, Nagel (1974) refers to a “point of view”, in which qualitative experiences are anchored, while Velmans (1990, 1993, 2009, 2017) understands that phenomenal content is composed of mental representations “projected” to the space external to the brains that construct them. In Freudian psychology, the conscious mind contains a tension between the Id and the Ego (FREUD, 1913). How to relate this bipolar structure with the results of neuroscience? I propose the notion of projection [also used by Williford et al. (2012)] as a bridge principle connecting the neurobiological systems of knowing, feeling and acting with the bipolar structure. The projective process is considered responsible for the generation of the sense of self and the sense of the world, composing an informational phenomenal field generated by the nervous system and experienced in the first-person perspective. After presenting the projective hypothesis, I discuss its philosophical status, relating it to the phenomenal (BLOCK, 1995, 2008, 2011) and high-order thought (ROSENTHAL, 2006; BROWN, 2014) approaches, and a mathematical model of projection (RUDRAUF et al., 2017). Eight ways of testing the status of the projective hypothesis are briefly mentioned.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Alfredo Pereira Junior

Professor at São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP – Brasil.

Referências

ALLEN, C.; TRESTMAN, M. Animal consciousness. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Winter Edition. Stanford, USA: CSLI Stanford University 2016. Avaliable on: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousnessanimal/>. Access in: 16 jun.2018.

BAARS, B. J. A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

BARRETT, L. F. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, v. 12, n. 47, p. 1-23, 2017.

BARRETT, L. F.; RUSSELL, J. A. Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 74, n. 4, p. 967-984, 1998.

BHANGAL, S. et al. Involuntary entry into consciousness from the activation of sets: object counting and color naming. Front Psychol. v. 9, p. 1017, 2018. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01017. Avaliable on: <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC6021744/> . Access in: 16 jun.2018.

BLOCK, N. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 18, n. 2, p. 227-287, 1995.

______. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 30, n. 5-6, p. 481-499; discussion 499548, 2008.

______. Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends Cogn Sci., v. 15, n. 12, p. 567-575, 2011.

BOURGET, D.; MENDELOVICI, A. Phenomenal intentionality. In: ZALTA, E. N.

(ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017. Available on: <https://plato.stanford.

edu/archives/spr2017/entries/phenomenal-intentionality/>. Access in: 20 ago.2018.

BROWN, R. Consciousness doesn’t overflow cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 5, p. 1399, 2014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01399. Avaliable on: <https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255486/>. Access in: 16 ago.2018.

CARRARA-AUGUSTENBORG, C.; PEREIRA JR., A. Brain endogenous feedback and degrees of consciousness. In: CAVANNA, A. E.; NANI, A. (ed.). Consciousness: states, mechanisms and disorders. New York: Nova Science, 2012.

CLARK, A. Being there: putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.

CRICK, F. The astonishing hypothesis: the scientific search for the soul. New York: Charles Scribner’s; Maxwell McMillan, 1994.

DAMASIO, A. The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt, 2000.

DEHAENE, S.; CHANGEUX, J. P. Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, v. 70, n. 2, p. 200-227, 2011.

EDELMAN, G. M. The remembered present: a biological theory of consciousness. New York, NY, US: Basic Books, 1989.

FERNANDES DE LIMA, V. M.; PEREIRA JR., A. The plastic glial synaptic dynamics within the neuropil: a self-organizing system composed of polyelectrolytes in phase transition, Neural Plasticity, ID. 7192427, 2016. DOI:10.1155/2016/7192427. Avaliable on: <https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2016/7192427/> . Access in: 10 ago.2018.

FREUD, S. The Ego and the Id. London: Hogarth, 1923. (Standard Edition. V. 19).

GAZZANIGA, M. S. (ed.). The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.

HARNAD, S. Doing, feeling, meaning and explaining. 2011. Available on: . Access in: 10 ago. 2018.

HEIDEGGER, M. Being and time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.

HUSSERL, E. Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology. Translation by F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1913.

______. Meditations cartesiennes: introduction à la phenomenologie. Translation by G. Peiffer and E. Levinas. Paris: Vrin, 1947.

JEANNEROD, M. The cognitive neuroscience of action, Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.

KOCH, C. The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Englewood: Roberts & Company, 2003.

LEDOUX, J. E.; BROWN, R. A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., v. 114, n. 10, p. E2016–E2025, 2017. doi:10.1073/ pnas.1619316114.

LEHAR, S. Gestalt isomorphism and the primacy of subjective conscious experience: a gestalt bubble model. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, v. 26, n. 4, p. 375-444, 2003.

MARTON, F.; FENSHAM, P.; CHAIKLIN, S. A nobel’s eye view of scientific intuition: discussions with the Nobel prize winners in physics, chemistry and medicine. International Journal of Science Education, v. 16, n. 4, p. 457-473, 1994.

MCLEAN, P.D. The triune brain in evolution. New York: Plenum Press, 1990.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. Phenomenologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.

METZINGER, T. The ego tunnel: the science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basic Books, 2009.

MITTERAUER, B. The proemial synapse: consciousness-generating glial-neuronal units. In: PEREIRA JR., A.; LEHMANN, D. (ed.). The unity of mind, brain and world: current perspectives on a science of consciousness. Cambridge-UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

MOREWEDGE, C. K.; KAHNEMAN, D. Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends in cognitive sciences, v. 14, n. 10, p. 435-40, 2010.

MORSELLA, E. The function of phenomenal states: supramodular interaction theory. Psychol. Rev., v. 112, n. 4, p. 1000-1021, 2005.

NAGEL, T. What is it like to be a bat? Philos. Rev., v. 83, n. 4, p. 435-450, 1974. Avaliable on: <http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/maydede/mind/Nagel_ Whatisitliketobeabat.pdf>. Access in: 16 ago.2018.

______. The objective self. In: GINET, C.; SHOEMAKER, S. (org.). Knowledge and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983. p. 211-232.

NAGEL, T. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1986.

NORTHOFF, G. Neuro-philosophy and the healthy mind: learning from the Unwell Brain. New York; London: W.W. Norton, 2016.

ORNSTON, D. On projection: a study of Freud’s usage. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, v. 33, p. 117-166, 1978.

PANKSEPP, J. Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

______. Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition, v. 14, n. 1, p. 30-80, 2005.

PEREIRA JR. A. A percepção do tempo em Husserl. Trans/Form/Ação, v. 13, p.73-83, 1990.

______. Perceptual information integration: hypothetical role of astrocytes. Cognitive Computation, v. 4, n. 1, p. 51-62, 2012.

______. Triple-aspect monism: a conceptual framework for the science of human consciousness. In: PEREIRA JR., A.; LEHMANN, D. (ed.). The unity of mind, brain and world: current perspectives on a science of consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 299-337.

______. Triple-aspect monism: physiological, mental unconscious and conscious aspects of brain activity. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, v. 13, n. 2, p. 201-227, 2014. ______. Astroglial hydro-ionic waves guided by the extracellular matrix: an exploratory model. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2017. doi: 10.3233/JIN160003.

______.; ALMADA, L. F. Conceptual spaces and consciousness research: integrating cognitive and affective processes. Int J Mach Conscious, v. 3, n. 1, p. 127-143, 2011.

______.; BARROS, R. F.; SANTOS, R. P. The calcium wave model of the perceptionaction cycle: evidence from semantic relevance in memory experiments. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 4, p. 252, 2013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00252.

______.; FOZ, F. B.; ROCHA, A. F. Cortical potentials and quantum-LikeWaves in the generation of conscious episodes. Quantum Biosystems, v. 6, n. 1, p. 9-20, 2015.

______.; FOZ, F. B.; ROCHA, A. F. The dynamical signature of conscious processing: from modality-specific percepts to complex episodes. Psychology of Consciousness, v. 4, n. 2, p. 230-247, 2017.

______.; FURLAN, F. A. On the role of synchrony for neuron-astrocyte interactions and perceptual conscious processing. Journal of Biological Physics, v. 35, n. 4, p. 465- 481, 2009.

______ .; FURLAN, F. A. Astrocytes and human cognition: modeling information integration and modulation of neuronal activity. Progress in Neurobiology, v. 92, n. 3, p. 405-420, 2010.

______.; RICKE, H. What is consciousness? Towards a preliminary definition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 16, n. 5: p. 28-45, 2009.

______. et al. Understanding consciousness: a collaborative attempt to elucidate contemporary theories. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 17, n. 5/6, p. 213- 219, 2010.

______.; VIMAL, R.; PREGNOLATO, M. Can qualitative physics solve the hard problem? In: POZNANSKI, R.; TUSZINSKI, J.; FEINBERG, T. (ed.). Biophysics of Consciousness: a foundational approach. Singapore : World Scientific, 2016. p. 149-187.

______. et al. Consciousness and cosmos: building an ontological framework. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 25, n. 3/4, p. 181-205, 2018.

PREGNOLATO, M.; DAMIANI, G.; PEREIRA JR., A. Patterns of calcium signaling:

a link between chronic emotions and cancer. J Integr Neurosci., v. 16, n. 1(supl.), p. S43-S63, 2017.

REDDY, S. K. et al. The ‘self’ aspects: the sense of existence, identification, and location. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 2019. (Accepted in September 2018).

REVONSUO, A. Consciousness: The science of subjectivity. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.

ROCHA, A. F.; PEREIRA JR, A.; MASSAD, E. The brain: from fuzzy grammar to quantum computing. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005.

ROSENTHAL, D. M. Consciousness and its expression. In: ROSENTHAL, D. M. Consciousness and Mind. USA: Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 307-319.

RUDRAUF, D. et al. A mathematical model of embodied consciousness. J Theor Biol., v. 428, p. 106-131, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.05.032.

SILVA, J. A. et al. Acerca da métrica da percepção do espaço visual. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol., v. 69, n. 1, p.127-135, 2006.

SILVA, M. M. A concepção aristotélica do pensar em imagens. Preprint. No prelo.

STUSS, D. T.; ESKES, G. A.; FOSTER, J. K. Experimental neuropsychological studies of frontal lobe functions. In: BOLLER, F.; GRAFFMAN, J. (ed.). Handbook of Neuropsychology. New York: Elsevier Science, 1994. V. 9.

TERHUNE, D. B.; HEDMAN, L. R. A. Metacognition of agency is reduced in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognition, v. 168, p. 176-181, 2017.

TONONI, G. et al. Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., v. 17, n. 7, p. 450-461, 2016.

TYE, M. Ten problems of consciousness. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1995.

______. Representationalism and the transparency of experience. Noûs, v. 36, n 1, p. 137-51, 2002.

VARELA, F. J. Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 3, n. 4, p. 330-349, 1996.

______.; SHEAR, J The view from within: first-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 1999.

VELMANS, M. Consciousness, brain and the physical world. Philosophical Psychology, v. 3, n. 1, p. 77-99, 1990.

______. A reflexive science of consciousness. In: BOCK, G.; MARSH, J. (ed.). Experimental and theoretical studies of consciousness. Chichester: John Wiley, 1993. p. 8199.

______. Understanding consciousness. 2nd. ed. London: Routledge, 2009.

______. Reflexive monism: psychophysical relations among mind, matter and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 19, n. 9-10, p. 143-165, 2012. Available on: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258208689_Reflexive_Monism_ Psychophysical_Relations_among_Mind_Matter_and_Consciousness>. Access in: 16 ago.2018.

______. What and where are conscious experiences? Dualism, reductionism and reflexive monism. In: ALMQVIST, K.; HAAG, A. (ed.). The return of consciousness: a new science on old questions. Stockholm: Axel and Margaret Axson Johnson Foundation, 2017. p. 125-143.Avaliable on: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312596560_

What_and_where_are_conscious_experiences_Dualism_reductionism_and_ reflexive_monism>. Access in: 16 ago.2018.

WANG, F.; PEREIRA JR., A. Neuromodulation, emotional feelings and affective disorders. Mens Sana Monographs, v. 14, n. 1, p. 5-29, 2016.

WEGER, U.; WAGEMANN, J.; MEYER, A. Introspection in psychology: its contribution to theory and method in memory research. European Psychologist, 2018. Available on: <https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000296>. Access in: 10 ago.2018.

WILLIFORD, K.; RUDRAUF, D.; LANDINI, G. The paradoxes of subjectivity and the projective structure of consciousness. In: MIGUENS, S.; PREYER, G. (ed.). Consciousness and subjectivity. Frankfurt a. M.: Ontos, 2012. p. 47-321.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. On certainty. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell, 1969.

WOODRUFF, M. L. Consciousness in teleosts: there is something it feels like to be a fish. Animal Sentience, v. 13, n. 1, 2017.

WURTZ, R. H. Corollary discharge in primate vision. Scholarpedia, v. 8, n. 10, p. 12335, 2013.

ZAHAVI, D. Consciouness and (minimal) selfhood: getting clearer on for-me-ness and mineness. In: KRIEGEL, U. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, 2017.

Recebido: 15/11/2018

Aceito: 15/11/2018

Publicado

28-12-2018 — Atualizado em 10-02-2023

Como Citar

Pereira Junior, A. (2023). The projective theory of consciousness: from neuroscience to philosophical psychology. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista De Filosofia Da Unesp, 41(Special Issue), 199–232. Recuperado de https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/8298

Edição

Seção

Especial Sosa