Preconception care: developing and implementing regional and national programs

Authors

  • Hani Atrash Department of Epidemiology Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health
  • Brian Jack Department of Family Medicine Boston University School of Medicine

Keywords:

preconception care, preconception health, women’s health, maternal health, infant health, program development, program implementatio

Abstract

Introduction: During the past few decades, health workers have come to agree that there is a very important place for preconception care (PCC) in improving maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization issued recommendations encouraging countries to develop and implement preconception care programs. The reports include an in-depth discussion of the rationale and scientific evidence behind PCC as well as definitions, goals, components and recommended interventions to be included in PCC. These reports also offer very broad guidelines but do not offer details on how to develop and implement preconception care programs.

Objective: The CDC and WHO reports identify the need for multisectoral engagement in developing and implementing preconception care programs and propose some activities and strategies to be considered in developing PCC programs. However, the recommendations fall short of specifying real steps that countries and regions should take in implementing PCC programs. In this publication we propose action steps for developing and implementing regional or national preconception care programs.

Methods: We reviewed the published and unpublished literature (using PubMed and the Internet) to identify reports that describe processes for developing and implementing PCC programs. We used information from the literature along with experiences we gained through our work and interaction with States and developing countries to prepare a detailed description of the steps involved in developing and implementing a PCC program.

Results: We found very little in terms of “tools” for program managers and providers to use when developing and implementing PCC programs. We prepared a guide, including a summary of steps and a proposed timeline, for program directors to use for developing and implementing PCC programs.

Conclusion: Developing and implementing a sustainable PCC program should address issues related to educating the public, providers and policy makers about the benefits of PCC. It also includes establishing an infrastructure within the departments of health and ensuring resources to build, guide, monitor and evaluate the PCC program. Finally, implementation of a successful program depends heavily on the proper training of public health and clinical care providers in the delivery of the services included in the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hani Atrash, Department of Epidemiology Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health

MD, MPH, Adjunct Professor, Department of Epidemiology Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health

Brian Jack, Department of Family Medicine Boston University School of Medicine

MD, Professor and Vice Chair

References

World Health Organization (WHO). Meeting to Develop a Global Consensus on Preconception Care to Reduce Maternal and Childhood Mortality and Morbidity. Geneva: WHO, 2013.

Johnson K, Posner SF, Bierman J, Cordero JF, Atrash HK, Parker CS, et al. Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care - United States. A Report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Reconn Rep. 2006;55(RR-6):1-23.

Hood JR, Parker C, Atrash HK. Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care: Strategies for Implementation. J Women’s Health. 2007;16(4):454-7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.CDC3

World Health Organization (WHO). Preconception care: Maximizing the gains for maternal and child health [internet] 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 09] Available from: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/preconception_care_policy_brief.pdf

South Australian Perinatal Practice Guidelines. Preconception Advice [internet 2015. [cited 2020 Jun 09] Available from: https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/1f11de804eed8cb5afbeaf6a7ac0d6e4/Preconception+Advice_Sept2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-1f11de804eed8cb5afbeaf6a7ac0d6e4-n5jkcsW

Sheldon T. Netherlands considers introducing preconception care. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):686-7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39353.518067.DB

Ebrahim SH, Lo SST, Zhuo J, Han JY, Delvoye P, Han JY, Zhu L. Models of Preconception Care Implementation in Selected Countries. Matern Child Health J. 200610(Suppl 1):37-42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0096-9

Lassi ZS, Dean SV, Mallick D, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: delivery strategies and packages for care. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl 3):S7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S7

Farahi N, Zolotor A. Recommendations for Preconception Counseling and Care. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88(8):499-506.

World Health Organization (WHO). Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Meeting on Promoting Preconception Care in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Muscat, Oman, March 25-27 [internet] 2015. [cited 2020 Jun 09] Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/253415

World Health Organization (WHO). Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO): Informal working group on promoting Preconception Care in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Cairo, Egypt, September

-8 [internet] 2015. [cited 2020 Jun 09] Available from: http://applications.emro.who.int/docs/IC_Meet_Rep_2015_EN_16669.pdf

Gloor PA. Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Kania J, Kramer M. Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review [internet] 2011. [cited 2014 Mar 09] Available from: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact

Turner S, Merchant K, Kania J, Martin E. Understanding the Value of Backbone Organizations in Collective Impact: Part 3. Stanford Social Innovation Review [internet] 2012. [cited 2014 Mar 09] Available from: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/understanding_the_value_of_backbone_organizations_in_collective_impact_3#

Developing Program Goals and Measurable Objectives. CDC [internet]. [cited 2020 May 09] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/Program/pupestd/Developing%20Program%20Goals%20and%20Objectives.pdf.

Broussard DL, Sappenfield WB, Fussman C, Kroelinger CD, Grigorescu V. Core state preconception health indicators: a voluntary, multi-state selection process. Matern Child Health J. 2011;1592):158-68. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0575-x

Robbins CL, Zapata LP, Farr SL, Kroelinger CD, Morrow B, Ahluwalia I, et al. Core State Preconception Health Indicators — Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. 2014;63(3):1-61.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-15

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES