Domain analysis as an approach to the classification of cinematographic documents

Alexia Guimarães Monteiro da Silva; Luis Miguel Nunes Corujo; Jorge Manuel Rias  Revez

doi:10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02141

Autores

Alexia Guimarães Monteiro da Silva Universidade de Lisboa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-6449
Luis Miguel Nunes Corujo Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa – Centro de Estudos Clássicos
Jorge Manuel Rias Revez Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa – Centro de Estudos Clássicos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02141

Palavras-chave:

Knowledge organization, Domain analysis, Cinematographic documentation, Cinematographic language

Resumo

Information Science and Archival Studies do not yet have a relevant theoretical production on the classification and organization of documentation originating from cinematographic production. This exploratory research aims to understand how Domain Analysis can assist Knowledge Organization applied to cinematographic documentation in the archival context. One of the main problems concerns the documents generated during cinematographic production not being custodied together with the movie, which is the main product of a complex artistic, technical, and administrative process. A constructivist perspective is adopted, in which the domain of cinema is explored concerning its language. The aim is to understand the domain that influences the materialization of information, thus producing records of a diverse range of genres, from audio-visual to textual. The concept of Domain Analysis and its relationship with Archival Studies is explored, including the benefits of provenance as a Domain Analysis approach to the classification of cinematographic documentation. The importance of cultural and social context is revealed to link the different dimensions of cinematographic production, which allows knowledge to be built from its information.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Biografia do Autor

Alexia Guimarães Monteiro da Silva , Universidade de Lisboa

Alexia Silva has a Bachelor degree in Archival Science (Fluminense Federal University - UFF), and is a Master degree student in Documentation and Information Science (University of Lisbon)

Luis Miguel Nunes Corujo, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa – Centro de Estudos Clássicos

Luis Corujo holds a PhD in Information Science (University of Coimbra)
with a thesis on electronic records appraisal, a Master in Library and
Documentation – Archives (University of Lisbon), a Specialization in
Documentation Sciences – Archives (Portucalense University), and a
Graduation in History – Educational Field (University of Porto). He is
an Invited Assistant Professor in the Information Science Program,
School of Arts and Humanities (University of Lisbon), and an Archivist
at the Faculty of Sciences at the same University. He works as a
researcher at the Centre for Classical Studies (University of Lisbon)
and Centre for 20th Century Interdisciplinary Studies – CEIS20
(University of Coimbra). He is also a member of the ISKO
(International Society for Knowledge Organization) - Iberian Chapter.

Jorge Manuel Rias Revez, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa – Centro de Estudos Clássicos

Jorge Revez is an Assistant Professor in Information Science Program, School of Arts and Humanities (University of Lisbon) since 2020, teaching previously as an Invited Lecturer since 2007. He holds a PhD in Information Science (University of Coimbra) with a thesis on the relationship of libraries and researchers, a BA in History, a Master in Contemporary History, and a Library and Documentation Special Post-Graduation Course (University of Lisbon). He worked as a Librarian for several years in special and academic libraries, and as a criminal information analyst. He works as a researcher at the Centre for Classical Studies (University of Lisbon), Centre for 20th Century Interdisciplinary Studies – CEIS20 (University of Coimbra), and Centre of Religious History Studies (Portuguese Catholic University).

Referências

Andersen, Jack, and Laura Skouvig. “Knowledge Organization : A Sociohistorical Analysis and Critique Author.” The Library Quaterly: Information, Community, Policy, vol. 76, no. 3, 2006, pp. 300–22.

Aumont, Jacques, et al. A Estética Do Filme. Papirus Editora, 1995.

Balázs, Béla. Theory of the Film. Dennis Dobson LTD, 1952, http://marefateadyan.nashriyat.ir/node/150.

Barthes, Roland. Elementos de Semiologia. 16th ed., Editora Cultrix, 2006.

Bazin, André. O Cinema. 1st ed., Brasiliense, 1991.

Betton, Gerard. Estética Do Cinema. Livraria Martins Fontes editora LTDA, 1987.

Bordwell, David, et al. Film Art: An Introduction. 4th ed., University of Wisconsin, 2017.

Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. “A Arte Do Cinema: Uma Introdução.” São Paulo, Campinas: Edusp, Editora Da Unicamp, EdUSP, 2013, https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?q=a+arte+do+cinema+bordwell&btnG=&hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5#3.

Cook, Terry. “Archival Science and Postmodernism: New Formulations for Old Concepts.” Archival Science, vol. 1, no. 1, 2001, pp. 3–24, doi:10.1007/BF02435636.

---. “The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions.” Archivaria, vol. 35, 1993.

Cordeiro, Rosa Ines de Novais. Informação e Movimento: Uma Ciência Da Arte Fílmica. 2000.

Dahlberg, Ingetraut. “Knowledge Organization: Its Scope and Possibilities.” Knowledge Organization, vol. 20, no. 4, 1993, pp. 211–22, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-1993-4-211.

Dayan, Daniel. “O Código Tutor Do Cinema Clássico.” Teoria Contemporânea Do Cinema - Vol. I, Senac Sâo Paulo, 2005, pp. 321–38.

Barros, Camila Monteiro de, and Lígia Maria Arruda Café. “Estudos Da Semiótica Na Ciência Da Informação: Relatos de Interdisciplinaridades.” Perspectivas Em Ciencia Da Informacao, vol. 17, no. 3, 2012, pp. 18–33, doi:10.1590/S1413-99362012000300003.

Douglas, Jennifer. “Origins: Evolving Ideas about the Principle of Provenence.” Currents of Archival Thinking, edited by Terry Eastwood and Heather MacNeil, Libraries Unlimited, 2010, pp. 23–44.

Eisenstein, Sergei. A Forma Do Filme. Edited by Jorge Zahar, 2002.

Friedman, Alon, and Martin Thellefsen. “Concept Theory and Semiotics in Knowledge Organization.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 67, no. 4, 2011, pp. 644–74, doi:10.1108/00220411111145034.

Gnoli, Claudio. “Ten Long-Term Research Questions in Knowledge Organization.” Knowledge Organization, vol. 35, no. 2–3, 2008, pp. 137–49, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-137.

Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves, and Natália Bolfarini Tognoli. “Provenance as a Domain Analysis Approach in Archival Knowledge Organization.” Knowledge Organization, vol. 42, no. 8, 2015, pp. 562–69, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-562.

Hjelmslev, Louis. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. The University of Wisconsin Press, 1961.

Hjørland, Birger. “Domain Analysis in Information Science: Eleven Approaches - Traditional as Well as Innovative.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 58, no. 4, 2002, pp. 422–62, doi:10.1108/00220410210431136.

---. “Empiricism, Rationalism and Positivism in Library and Information Science.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 61, no. 1 SPEC. ISS., 2005, pp. 130–55, doi:10.1108/00220410510578050.

---. “Fundamentals of Knowledge Organization.” Knowledge Organization, vol. 30, no. 2, 2003, pp. 87–111.

---. “Knowledge Organization (KO).” Knowledge Organization, vol. 43, no. 6, 2016, pp. 475–84, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2016-6-475.

---. “Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization: Integrative Levels.” Knowledge Organization, vol. 44, no. 5, 2017, pp. 349–79, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2017-5-349.

Hjørland, Birger, and Hanne Albrechtsen. “Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain‐analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, no. 6, 1995, pp. 400–25, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y.

Jakobson, Roman. Linguistica. Poética. Cinema. 2a, Perspectiva, 2007.

Lima, Telma Cristiane Sasso de, and Regina Célia Tamaso Mioto. “Procedimentos Metodológicos Na Construção Do Conhecimento Científico: A Pesquisa Bibliográfica.” Revista Katálysis, vol. 10, no. spe, 2007, pp. 37–45, doi:10.1590/s1414-49802007000300004.

Lotman, Yuri. “Introdução.” Estética e Semiótica Do Cinema, Editoral Estampa, 1978.

Mai, Jens Erik. “A Postmodern Theory of Knowledge Organization.” Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, vol. 36, no. January 1999, 1999, pp. 547–56.

Marques, Aída. Ideias Em Movimento. Edited by ROCCO, 1a, 2007.

Martin, Marcel. A Linguagem Cinematográfica. Dinalivro, 2005.

Metz, Christian. A Significação No Cinema. 1972, p. 295.

---. Linguagem e Cinema. Editora Perspectiva, 1980.

Millar, Laura. “The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.” Archivaria, vol. 53, no. 1, 2002, pp. 1–15.

Mitry, Jean. The Aesthetics and Psychology of the Cinema. Translated by Christopher King. Bloomington, IN, USA: Indiana University Press, 1997.

Nesmith, Tom. “Postmodersnism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives.” The American Archivist, vol. 65, no. 1, 2002, pp. 24–41.

---. “Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.” Archivaria, vol. 47, no. 47, 1999, pp. 136–50.

Oliveira, Robespierre de, and Angélica Antonechen Colombo. “Cinema e Linguagem: As Transformações Perceptivas e Cognitivas.” Discursos Fotograficos, vol. 10, no. 16, 2014, pp. 13–34, doi:10.5433/1984-7939.2013v10n16p13.

Raber, Douglas, and John M. Budd. “Information as Sign: Semiotics and Information Science.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 59, no. 5, 2003, pp. 507–22, doi:10.1108/00220410310499564.

Rodrigues, Chris. O Cinema e a Produção. 3a, Lamparina, 2007.

Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. The Philosofical Library, Inc., 1959.

---. “The Object of Study.” Course in General Linguistics, Bloomsbury, 2013, pp. 9–19.

Thellefsen, Martin Muderspach, et al. “Information as Signs: A Semiotic Analysis of the Information Concept, Determining Its Ontological and Epistemological Foundations.” Journal of Documentation, vol. 74, no. 2, 2018, pp. 372–82, doi:10.1108/JD-05-2017-0078.

Tognoli, Natália Bolfarini, and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães. “A Organização Do Conhecimento Arquivístico: Perspectivas de Renovação a Partir Das Abordagens Científicas Canadenses.” Perspectivas Em Ciencia Da Informacao, vol. 16, no. 1, 2011, pp. 21–44, doi:10.1590/S1413-99362011000100003.